Literature DB >> 25363104

Assessment the trend of inequality in the distribution of intensive care beds in Iran: using GINI index.

Mohammad Meskarpour-Amiri, Parisa Mehdizadeh, Mohsen Barouni, Nooredin Dopeykar1, Maryam Ramezanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIM: While most of the published researches have reported the amount of inequity in geographical distribution of important health resources, only a small number of studies have focused on the trend of inequality in the distribution of these resources. The purpose of this study was to determine the trend of inequality in the distribution of intensive care beds in Iran during 2010 to 2012 by using the Gini coefficient.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional research conducted in 2013. The changes over three years (2010 to 2012) were calculated by Gini coefficient to investigate the trend of inequality in geographical distribution of intensive care beds (CCU, ICU and NICU).
RESULTS: The Gini coefficient for CCU beds was calculated as 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The Gini coefficient for ICU beds was calculated as 0.03, 0.05 and 0.05 in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Also, the Gini coefficient for NICU bed was calculated as 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Regarding to Gini coefficient, the trend of inequality was increased in the distribution of intensive care beds in Iran. Particularly, the inequalities in distribution of CCU beds were significantly increased during past years. In fact, if this trend of inequality continues, the distribution of intensive care beds will be extremely unequal in the next five years in Iran.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363104      PMCID: PMC4825512          DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob J Health Sci        ISSN: 1916-9736


1. Background

In general, one of the most important goals of a health system is to provide public accessibility and equality in receiving health and treatment services (Kiadaliri, Najafi, & Haghparast-Bidgoli, 2011; Balarajan, Selvaraj, & Subramanian, 2011). Since accessibility to health is one of the basic rights of individuals in the society; nowadays accessibility of individuals in a society to health services counts as one measure of development (Kottke & Isham, 2010; Mackenbach et al., 2008). Furthermore, limited accessibility to health services and the inequality in availability of the services furnished by health and treatment systems deprives these people of acceptable and effective treatment (Kottke & Isham, 2010; Reddy, 2004; Tofighi, Meskarpour, & Ameryoun, 2011). Inequality in health services in different countries has taken the form of a global challenge (Mackenbach et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2008) affected by various factors, including individual, social and geographical variables (Mackenbach et al., 2003; Marmot, 2001). These factors are stronger in developing countries (Balarajan et al., 2011) so much so that the geographical distribution of health in developing countries has turned into a fundamental issue. Therefore, the measurement of fair distribution of health services on top of previous measures has been emphasized by World Health Organization (World Health Organization, 2000). Identifying the number and types of intensive care beds and their distribution may prove as an indirect measurement of the accessibility to inpatient intensive care services (Horev, Pesis-Katz, & Mukamel, 2004; Pedersen & Lilleeng, 2000). Despite the fact that in many cases the proportion of beds to population may be used as a measure of the distribution of health services, a high proportion does not necessarily imply an equal accessibility of the population to such facilities and services. Therefore, examining the distribution of a service in a given geographical location could be a supplementary criterion to the existing measures of central tendencies (Horev et al., 2004). Iran, like other developing countries, is faced with the lack of intensive care resources (Ameryoun, Meskarpour-Amiri, Lorgard Dezfuli-Nejad, Khoddami-Vishteh, & Tofighi, 2011; Tofighi, Meskarpour Amiri, Ameriuon, & Naseri, 2011). Although the number of intensive care beds has grown substantially in recent years, it does not still seem enough. Previous studies (Ameryoun et al., 2011) showed that the number of per population intensive care beds in Iran is lower than those in many developing countries. Shortage of per population intensive care beds in Iran causes problems such as patient transference between provinces (Ameryoun et al., 2011), long waiting line of receiving intensive care unit services (Abedi, Seiyamiyan, & Rostami, 2012) increase mortality and cost of treatment (Ameryoun et al., 2011; Tofighi et al., 2011), reducing the patient satisfaction (Abdi, Delgoshaei, Ravaghi, Abbasi, & Heyrani, 2013) and quality of care (Falahinia, Zareian, Oshvandi, Farhanchi, & Moghimbigi, 2013) in intensive care units. One solution to these problems is to increase the number of intensive care beds in short term, but according to the limited resources this doesn’t seem rational and feasible. Another solution is to distribute the available intensive care beds more efficiently and equitably. In terms of intensive care beds shortage, the uneven distribution of the bed can greatly threaten the access to care. In other words, inequality in the distribution of intensive care beds could increase the problems caused by the shortage of this beds. Thus, the distribution of intensive care beds in developing countries like Iran seems to be more important. In Iran, establishment of public hospitals by government and especially set up of intensive care units in public hospitals are greatly influenced by two main factors, the number of population and the bargaining power of local politicians. Therefore, the needs of population and regional epidemiology of diseases have received lower attention in health resource allocation. Additionally, the activities of the private sector in health care were always based on the principle of profit; however the government`s incentives were not useful to encourage private sector to develop in less developed areas (Ameryoun et al., 2011; Tofighi et al., 2011). While many studies have focused on measuring the amount of inequality in the distribution of health resources in both developed and developing countries, there still is a question here: whether the distribution of health care resources goes toward equality or inequality? In fact, most of the published researches have emphasized on the inequality in geographical distribution of important medical resource such as hospital beds (Ameryoun et al., 2011; Mackenbach et al., 2008; Nishiura et al., 2004), Medical staffs (Fülöp, Kopetsch, Hofstätter, & Schöpe, 2008; Kreng & Yang, 2011; Theodorakis & Mantzavinis, 2005) and medical equipment (Chun-xia, Lang, Yu-ming, & Zhao-hui, 2007; He Yu, & Chen, 2013), however only a small number of studies have focused on the trend of inequality in the distribution of these resources. Inequality in receiving health services is measured by different scales (Williams & Doessel, 2006), one of which is the Gini coefficient which is based on the Lorenz curve. This coefficient compares the cumulative frequency of the distribution of a given variable with the normal distribution of that variable (which shows equality) (Berndt, Fisher, & Rajendrababu, 2003; Williams & Doessel, 2006). Over the past few years, dramatic growth has been occurred in the number of intensive care beds in Iran. Only from 2010 to 2011, the number of intensive care beds has increased by 12.6%. Due to the increase in intensive care beds in Iran, the attention of policy makers and researchers have been on this question that whether the trend in distribution of intensive care beds is towards equality or inequality? The purpose of this study was to determine the trend of inequality in the distribution of intensive care beds in Iran during 2010 to 2012, using the Gini coefficient.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was a cross-sectional research that performed in 2013. Changes in the Gini coefficient over three years (2010 to 2012) were used to study the trend of inequality in geographical distribution of intensive care beds (CCU, ICU and NICU). The population data of Iranian provinces from 2010 to 2012 were obtained from the Statistics Center of Iran. The number of intensive care beds (ICU, Post ICU and NICU beds) in each province from 2010 to 2012 was based on the latest reported information of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran. According to the prior studies (Ameryoun et al., 2011; He et al., 2013), the Gini coefficient is calculated by the following formula: Where X was the cumulative percentage of the population and Y was the cumulative percentage of each type of intensive care beds. The Gini coefficient ranges between 0 and 1, where theoretically, zero corresponds to a perfect equality and 1 corresponds to a perfect inequality. Based on the previous studies (Ameryoun et al., 2011; He et al., 2013), Gini coefficient which is smaller than 0.2 is considered as low inequality level; between 0.2 and 0.3 is considered as moderate inequality; between 0.3 and 0.4 is considered as high inequality; higher than 0.4 is considered as extreme inequality. The demographic data as well as the number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds were entered into MS Excel spreadsheet. The number of each type of CCU and Post CCU bed per 100.000 people, and the cumulative percentages of each type of bed were calculated. Finally, the Gini coefficients for each type of bed were calculated by using the above formula.

3. Results

In 2010, 2011 and 2012, Iran had a total population of 73.650.566, 74.733.231 and 75.149.669 with total numbers of 3160, 3430 and 3665 CCU beds, the total number of 3384, 3576 and 3698 ICU beds and the total number of 1189, 1295 and 1349 NICU beds, respectively. Tehran, the capital of Iran, had the largest amount of CCU, ICU and NICU beds and population during 2010-2012. The total numbers of CCU, ICU and NICU beds from 2010 to 2012 are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Total number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds from 2010 to 2012 by province

Province201020112012



PopulationCCUICUNICUPopulationCCUICUNICUPopulationCCUICUNICU
East Azerbaijan366796812515783369127014316286372462015917688
West Azerbaijan297960410514652301630111014756308057611014757
Ardebil123877840791812429564281181248488448318
Isfahan474161522422275480445823523276487931223823276
Ilam5610011618856633217199557599181910
Bushehr9289304535179435354637171032949464117
Tehran144481847177902471250570576378025612183391871801273
KarajNENENENE22894126645102412513664810
Chaharmahal&Bakhtyari883856303420892909323420895263343421
South Khorasan666493262314676794272617662534273819
RazaviKhorasan585201014920811959407661532311295994402155237131
North Khorasan831684252520838781252520867727252520
Khuzestan442087415416429447148816516830453172017917938
Zanjan9783102552199833692967201015734346722
Semnan615601375314624482375314631218375314
Sistan&Baluchestan265076710311157273320511912367253432711912367
Fars447908728024155452851428424864459665828725266
Qazvin119477123291012124642632101201565283210
Qom110714540742011277134074241151672407424
Kordestan146018062341414675857047191493645704719
Kerman28729021228752294734612610857293898813811761
Kermanshah189846470116451905793731194519452277011945
Kohkiluyeh & Buyer Ahmad66021615166669140151615658629151615
Golestan166901978651716870869265201777014926924
Gilan2440405826113245346995701324808741097413
Lorestan17471599382291758226113844017542431178443
Mazandaran300757016622169303733617823069307394322223469
Markazi138164566502613924356653261413959665326
Hormozgan15197006634815588786737111578183684014
Hamedan169981549821716995884985211758268549923
Yazd104681612775161065893127781610744281278516
Total736505663160338411897373323134303576129575149669366536981349

NE: Not exist (after the Parliamentary approval, Karaj was introduced as 31st province of Iran from 2011).

Total number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds from 2010 to 2012 by province NE: Not exist (after the Parliamentary approval, Karaj was introduced as 31st province of Iran from 2011). There were 4.29, 4.59 and 4.87 CCU beds for each 100.000 people across the nation in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. There were 4.59, 478 and 4.92ICU beds for each 100.000 people across the nation in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. Also, there were 1.61, 1.73 and 1.79 NICU beds for each 100.000 people in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. Table 2 shows the number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds per 100.000 populations from 2010 to 2012.
Table 2

Number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds per 100.000 population from 2010 to 2012

Province201020112012



CCUICUNICUCCUICUNICUCCUICUNICU
East Azerbaijan3.4084.282.2633.8744.3892.334.2694.7252.363
West Azerbaijan3.5244.91.7453.6474.8741.8573.5714.7721.85
Ardebil3.2296.3771.4533.3796.5171.4483.5246.6481.442
Isfahan4.7244.6821.5824.8914.8291.5824.8784.7551.558
Ilam2.8523.2091.4263.0023.3351.5893.2283.4071.793
Bushehr4.8443.7681.834.8753.9211.8024.4533.9691.646
Tehran4.9635.4681.716.1016.2372.0477.1496.5752.226
KarajNENENE2.8831.9660.4372.7361.990.415
Chaharmahal&Bakhtyari3.3943.8472.2633.5843.8082.243.7983.7982.346
South Khorasan3.9013.4512.1013.9893.8422.5124.0755.7362.868
RazaviKhorasan2.5463.5542.0332.5753.8882.1712.5863.9542.185
North Khorasan3.0063.0062.4052.9812.9812.3842.8812.8812.305
Khuzestan3.4833.710.6563.693.7570.6713.953.950.839
Zanjan2.5555.3151.9422.9496.8132.0433.3476.5962.166
Semnan6.018.6092.2745.9258.4872.2425.8628.3962.218
Sistan&Baluchestan3.8864.1872.154.3544.52.4514.6964.8532.644
Fars6.2515.3811.2286.2715.4761.4136.2445.4821.436
Qazvin1.9252.4270.8372.1442.6390.8252.332.6630.832
Qom3.6136.6841.8063.5476.5622.1283.4736.4252.084
Kordestan4.2462.3280.9594.773.2031.2954.6873.1471.272
Kerman4.2473.0281.814.2753.6641.9344.6953.9812.076
Kermanshah3.6876.112.373.836.2442.3613.5996.1182.313
Kohkiluyeh& Buyer Ahmad2.2722.4230.9092.2422.3912.2422.2772.4292.277
Golestan4.6733.8951.0195.4533.8531.1855.1773.8831.351
Gilan3.362.50.5333.8722.8530.534.3942.9830.524
Lorestan5.3234.6931.666.4274.7782.2756.674.7882.451
Mazandaran5.5197.3482.2945.867.5722.2727.2227.6122.245
Markazi4.7773.6191.8824.743.8061.8674.6683.7481.839
Hormozgan4.3432.2370.5264.2982.3740.7064.3092.5350.887
Hamedan2.8834.82412.8835.0011.2363.0715.6311.308
Yazd12.137.1651.52811.917.3181.50111.827.9111.489
Total4.2914.5951.6144.594.7851.7334.8774.9211.795

NE: Not exist (after the Parliamentary approval, Karaj was introduced as 31st province of Iran from 2011).

Number of CCU, ICU and NICU beds per 100.000 population from 2010 to 2012 NE: Not exist (after the Parliamentary approval, Karaj was introduced as 31st province of Iran from 2011). The Gini coefficient for CCU bed was calculated as 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. The Gini coefficient for ICU bed was calculated as 0.03, 0.05 and 0.05 in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. Also, the Gini coefficient for NICU bed was calculated as 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 in 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. Table 3 shows the Gini coefficient for CCU, ICU and NICU beds from 2010 to 2012. Also, Figure 1 illustrates the trend of inequality in geographical distribution of each intensive bed during 2010-2012.
Table 3

Gini coefficient for CCU, ICU and NICU from 2010 to 2012

Gini coefficient201020112012
CCU0.02270.04680.0676
ICU0.03860.05420.0526
NICU0.02100.03580.0416
Figure 1

Trend of Gini coefficient of CCU, ICU and NICU during 2010-2012

Gini coefficient for CCU, ICU and NICU from 2010 to 2012 Trend of Gini coefficient of CCU, ICU and NICU during 2010-2012

4. Discussion

Generally speaking, it should be noted that the cost-effectiveness of the establishment of intensive care units is much less than the cost-effectiveness of preventive measures such as immunization and primary health care. Therefore, based on the principle of prioritizing resource allocation, especially in the developing countries like Iran, it is necessary to consider the cost-opportunity of investment in the development of intensive care units. The shortage of intensive care beds in Iran has been cited in numerous studies (Abedi et al., 2012; Ameryoun et al., 2011; Tofighi et al., 2011). However, this study was intended to examine the issue of inequality trend in the distribution of existing intensive care beds in Iran regardless of whether or not a shortage exists in number of such beds. As a matter of fact, the unequal distribution of intensive care beds often leads to unequal distribution of valuable health resources such as specialist doctors, medical equipment and trained nurses. The findings show that the mean number of CCU beds per 100.000 population in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are 4.29, 4.59 and 4.87, respectively. In each of the three years, Yazd province with 12.13, 11.91 and 11.82 beds per 100.000 population had the highest CCU beds than any other provinces (two times more than that of other provinces). Also, Qazvin province in 2010 and 2011 with 1.92 and 2.14 respectively and Kohkiluyeh Province in 2012 with 2.27 had the lowest CCU beds per 100.000 population. The obtained Gini coefficient for the distribution of CCU beds in 2010, 2011 and 2012 was 0.022, 0.046 and 0.067 respectively which statically proves the equality in geographical distribution of CCU beds across Iran. But the trend of Gini coefficient during the three years was toward inequality, So that the numerical value of the Gini coefficient was nearly tripled from 2010 to 2012. In a study, Kiadaliri et al. (Kiadaliri, Safari, & Hosseinpour, 2010) showed that Yazd province enjoys the most equal distribution of CCU beds and Ilam province suffers from the least equal distribution of CCU beds. A study on the distribution of active hospital beds in Iran, the Gini coefficient for active beds was reported 0.08 and active beds per 10.000 population in 2006 was reported 9.2, while Yazd province had maximum and Lorestan province had the minimum beds per population (Tofighi, Maleki, Shahabi, Delpasand, & Nafisi, 2010). In another study conducted in 2002 based on Morris Imbalance Coefficient, Yazd province stands at the highest rank in terms of the number of hospital beds and Semnan province ranks the highest in terms of the number of health centers (Eskandari, 2010). A study conducted on the distribution of CCU beds in 24 university hospitals in the Netherlands from 2004 to 2006, Gini coefficients were reported 0.638, 0.569 and 0.569, which reflect the unequal distribution (De Bruin, Bekker, & Van Zanten, 2010). The mean number of ICU beds per 100.000 population in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are 4.59, 4.78 and 4.92, respectively. In each of the three years, Semnan province with 8.60, 8.48 and 8.39 beds per 100.000 population had the highest ICU beds than any other provinces. Also, Hormozgan province in 2010 with 2.23 and Alborz province (Karaj) in 2011 and 2012 with 1.96 and 1.99 respectively had the lowest ICU beds per population. The obtained Gini coefficient for the distribution of ICU beds in 2010, 2011 and 2012 was 0.038, 0.054 and 0.052 respectively; as a result it proves the equality in geographical distribution of CCU beds across Iran. However, the general trend of Gini coefficient during the three years was toward inequality, so that the numerical value of the Gini coefficient has generally been rising from 2010 to 2012. In the same study conducted by Ameryoun et al. (2011) in 2011, the number of ICU beds per 100.000 population in Iran in 2006 was reported 5.3 and the Gini coefficient was reported 0.17. Also, Semnan with 8.6 ICU beds per 100.000 population considered as the second province with the maximum of ICU beds. In comparison with the results of our study, the mean number of ICU beds is much more than the obtained Gini coefficient, since according to Ameryoun et al. (2011) the reported number of ICU beds was belonged to both public and private sectors. In a study on the distribution of ICU beds in Western Europe countries, Wunsch et al. (Wunsch et al., 2008) showed that the proportion of ICU beds per 100.000 people in 2005 was 9.3 in France, 8.4 in the Netherlands, 8.2 in Spain and 5.3 in England. In South Africa, there were 4, 168 ICU beds in 2005, from which 86% were installed in three provinces. The proportion of beds varied greatly in different provinces of Iran, from 1:20.000 to 1:80.000 (Bhagwanjee & Scribante, 2007). A study conducted by Horev et al in the U.S. in 1998 on the distribution of hospital beds, the coefficients in different states of America were 0.0571-0.4303 (Horev et al., 2004). The 1970-1997 trends indicated the progressive equality in the distribution of hospital beds. It has been reported that the northern states enjoy an equal distribution of hospital beds (Horev et al., 2004). Also, the mean number of NICU beds per 100.000 population in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are 1.61, 1.73 and 1.79, respectively. In each of the three years, Northern Khorasan province with 2.40, 2.38 and 2.30 beds per 100.000 population had the highest NICU beds than any other provinces (two times more than that of other provinces). In addition, Hormozgan province in 2010 with 0.52 and Alborz provience (Karaj) in 2011 and 2012 with 0.43 and 0.41 respectively had the lowest per population NICU beds. The obtained Gini coefficient for distribution of NICU beds in 2010, 2011 and 2012 was 0.021, 0.035 and 0.041, respectively which statically proves the equality in geographical distribution of CCU beds across Iran. However, the general trend of Gini coefficient during the three years was toward inequality, so that the numerical value of the Gini coefficient was about double from 2010 to 2012. In the same study which was conducted in Iran, the number of NICU beds per 100,000 population and Gini coefficient were reported 1.6 and 0.23, respectively (Ameryoun et al., 2011). The high prevalence and morbidity associated with cardiovascular diseases is one of the most pressing health problems in Iran. The findings of the studies showed that the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in Iran is higher than the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in Western countries and some Middle East countries (Ebrahimi, Kazemi-Bajestani, Ghayour-Mobarhan, & Ferns, 2011; Talaei et al., 2013). According to this dilemma, therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention on appropriate distribution of intensive care beds in Iran. However there are some limitations in this study including that in this study we examined the distribution of intensive care beds in the public sector only, so with considering the private sector the inequality may be more because the private sector is often developed by the demand and ability to pay not population needs. Also recommended that in future studies the equity in distribution of intensive care beds examined based on the epidemiology of diseases and specific needs of each province.

5. Conclusion

According to our study, although in all years (2010-2012) the numerical value of Gini coefficients proves equality in distribution of Intensive Care Beds across Iran but the trend of Gini coefficients was toward inequality. In other words, increasing rate of inequality observed in Gini coefficient trend for Intensive care beds in Iran. Particularly the inequalities in distribution of CCU beds are significantly increased during past years. If this trend of inequality did persist, in the next five years the distribution of intensive care beds in Iran can be extremely unequal.
  22 in total

1.  Cardiovascular disease in non-Western countries.

Authors:  K Srinath Reddy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US.

Authors:  Tuvia Horev; Irena Pesis-Katz; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Health inequalities in Thailand: geographic distribution of medical supplies in the provinces.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishiura; Sujan Barua; Saranath Lawpoolsri; Chatporn Kittitrakul; Martinus Martin Leman; Masri Sembiring Maha; Sant Muangnoicharoen
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.267

4.  Study of large medical equipment allocation in Xuzhou.

Authors:  Chun-xia Miao; Lang Zhuo; Yu-ming Gu; Zhao-hui Qin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries.

Authors:  Johan P Mackenbach; Vivian Bos; Otto Andersen; Mario Cardano; Giuseppe Costa; Seeromanie Harding; Alison Reid; Orjan Hemström; Tapani Valkonen; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Measuring health care access and quality to improve health in populations.

Authors:  Thomas E Kottke; George J Isham
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Equity in the distribution of CT and MRI in China: a panel analysis.

Authors:  Da He; Hao Yu; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2013-06-06

8.  Inequalities in health.

Authors:  M Marmot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Coronary artery disease and its risk factors status in iran: a review.

Authors:  M Ebrahimi; S M R Kazemi-Bajestani; M Ghayour-Mobarhan; G A A Ferns
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  Tackling the challenges to health equity in China.

Authors:  Shenglan Tang; Qingyue Meng; Lincoln Chen; Henk Bekedam; Tim Evans; Margaret Whitehead
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment inequality in access to public cardiovascular health services in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Meskarpour-Amiri; Nooredin Dopeykar; Ahmad Ameryoun; Ali Mehrabi Tavana
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-10-08

2.  Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Reza Goharani; Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Behrooz Farzanegan; Farshid R Bashar; Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili; Seyedpouzhia Shojaei; Seyed J Madani; Keivan Gohari-Moghaddam; Sevak Hatamian; Seyed M M Mosavinasab; Masoum Khoshfetrat; Mohammad A Khabiri Khatir; Andrew C Miller
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-01-22

3.  Designing and validating a measuring tool for the factors affecting the distribution of hospitals' intensive care beds in Iran.

Authors:  Nahid Farrokhyar; Khalil Alimohammadzadeh; Ali Maher; Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini; Mohammadkarim Bahadori
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Estimate General Practitioners Active Supply in Iran: Capture-Recapture Method for Three Data Sources.

Authors:  Azad Shokri; Ali Akbari-Sari; Mahboubeh Bayat; Mahmoud Khodadost; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Elmira Mirbahaeddin; Fereshteh Farzianpour
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Identification of the Range of Nursing Skills Used to Provide Social Support for Mothers of Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Shadi Eskandari; Seyedeh Nooshaz Mirhaghjou; Maryam Maleki; Abbas Mardani; Mostafa Gholami; Celia Harding
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 6.  Health equity in Iran: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hesam Ghiasvand; Efat Mohamadi; Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Mohammad Mehdi Kiani; Bahram Armoon; Amirhossein Takian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-04-19

7.  Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili; Ali Amirsavadkouhi; Hamidreza Jamaati; Morteza Izadi; Seyed J Madani; Seyed M R Hashemian; Andrew C Miller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Distribution of hospital beds in Tehran Province based on Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve from 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  Iravan Masoudi Asl; Masoud Abolhallaje; Mehdi Raadabadi; Hamed Nazari; Aslan Nazari; Mohammad Salimi; Ali Javani
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-12-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.