| Literature DB >> 25363094 |
Maryam Zarei1, Huang Msl, Mohd Nasir Mohd Taib, Fatemeh Zarei.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim or this study was to determine factors associated with body weight status among Iranian adolescents in the two Secondary Schools run by the Embassy in Kuala Lumpur.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25363094 PMCID: PMC4825504 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
Socio-demographic characteristics (n = 296)
| Characteristics | Respondents | |
|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Mean±S.D | |
| Education Level | ||
| Secondary School | 150 (50.7) | |
| High School | 146 (49.3) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 150 (50.7) | |
| Female | 146 (49.3) | |
| Age Groups (Years) | 14.33±1.8 | |
| 12.0-13.0 | 100 (33) | 13.1±1.49 |
| >13 | 196 (77) | 16.36±1.4 |
| Mothers’ Educational Level | ||
| High school | 19 (6.5) | |
| Diploma | 43 (14.5) | |
| Bachelor | 83 (28) | |
| Master | 113 (38.2) | |
| PHD | 38 (12.8) | |
| Fathers’ Educational Level | ||
| High school | 18 (6.2) | |
| Diploma | 6 (2) | |
| Bachelor | 38 (12.8) | |
| Master | 75 (25.3) | |
| PHD | 159 (53.7) | |
| Mothers’ Occupation | ||
| Housewife | 137 (46.3) | |
| Working | 17 (5.7) | |
| Student | 142 (48.0) | |
| Fathers’ Occupation | ||
| Student | 178 (60.1) | |
| Working | 118 (39.9) | |
| Number of siblings | 1.81±0.53 | |
| 0 | 72 (24.3) | |
| 1 | 209 (70.3) | |
| ≥2 | 15 (5.40) | |
| Living arrangment | ||
| Alone | 8 (2.7) | |
| With Family | 288 (97.3) | |
| Duration of Time in Malaysia (Months) | 19.95± 10.18 | |
| <12 | 96 (32.5) | |
| 13-24 | 120 (40.5) | |
| 25-36 | 64 (21.6) | |
| >37 | 16 (5.4) | |
| Pocket money per week(RM) | 25.77±10 | |
| 10-20 | 132 (44.6) | |
| 21-30 | 30 (10.2) | |
| 31-40 | 96 (32.4) | |
| 41-50 | 38 (12.8) | |
| Total Monthly Household Income (RM) | 2498.85±474.88 | |
| 1001-1500 | 15 (5.1) | |
| 1501-2000 | 31 (10.4) | |
| 2001-2500 | 107 (36.1) | |
| 2501-3000 | 57 (19.3) | |
| >3001 | 86 (29.1) | |
| Academic performance | 15.53±2.3 | |
| 0-5 | 0 (0) | |
| 6-10 | 5 (1.70) | |
| 11-15 | 141 (47.6) | |
| 16-20 | 150 (50.7) | |
Distribution of respondents by consumption of breakfast (n = 296)
| Consumption of breakfast | Male (n=150) | Female (n=146) | Total (n=296) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Breakfast consumption (n=296) | |||
| Had Breakfast | 141 (94) | 81 (55.5) | 222 (75) |
| Did not have breakfast | 9 (6.0) | 65 (44.5) | 74 (25) |
| Number of Time for Breakfast (n = 222) | |||
| Male (n = 141) | Female (n = 91) | Total (n = 222) | |
| Fixed | 75 (57.3) | 58 (63.7) | 133 (59.9) |
| Different | 56 (42.7) | 33 (36.3) | 89 (40.1) |
| Frequency of intake (n=222) | |||
| Alone | 67 (47.5) | 47 (47) | 114 (46.5) |
| With family | 72 (51.1) | 41 (51) | 113 (51) |
| Friends | 2 (1.4) | 12 (8.4) | 17 (4.6) |
Food frequency score
| Food | Score | Food | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Highly consumed foods (Score: 80.0 - 100.0) | |||
| Cooking oil | 92.82 | Tea | 81.69 |
| Cooked Rice | 89.21 | Meat | 81.00 |
| White bread | 88.11 | Sandwich | 80.00 |
| Chips | 87.41 | ||
| B. Moderately consumed foods (Score: 60.0 - 79.9) | |||
| Cookie | 65.77 | Tomato | 61.55 |
| Cake | 65.55 | Lettuce | 61.51 |
| Egg | 64.30 | Apple | 61.50 |
| Cooked potato | 63.42 | Sugar | 61.01 |
| Ice cream | 62.45 | Fast food | 60.14 |
| Cookie | 65.77 | Coffee | 60.10 |
| Cake | 65.55 | Tomato | 61.55 |
| C. Less consumed foods (Score: 0 - 59.9) | |||
| Cooked corn | 57.34 | Carrot | 38.18 |
| Chocolate | 55.51 | Lentil | 38.14 |
| Chocolate milk | 55.51 | Mango | 37.57 |
| Nut | 55.04 | Green Pepper | 37.34 |
| Honey | 53.61 | Lemon | 36.42 |
| Jam | 52.61 | Tangerine | 36.26 |
| Orange | 52.60 | Mangos teen | 36.23 |
| Orange juice | 52.43 | Yogurt | 34.42 |
| Chicken | 52.00 | Full Cream Milk | 33.28 |
| Tomato sauce | 51.87 | Gourd | 32.62 |
| Pizza | 51.18 | Watermelon | 32.02 |
| Cheese | 48.61 | Low fat Milk | 31.44 |
| Iranian bread | 47.50 | Plum | 30.94 |
| Fish | 46.31 | Chick pea | 30.35 |
| Red bean | 45.07 | Pear | 28.88 |
| Banana | 43.51 | Butter | 26.97 |
| Pasta | 40.78 | Dried fruits | 24.07 |
| Rambo tan | 40.42 | Grape | 23.20 |
| Egg plant | 40.37 | Pine apple | 22.31 |
| Spinach | 39.87 | Soya | 18.40 |
| Whole grain bread | 39.22 | Beet | 15.64 |
| Green bean | 38.27 | ||
Correlation between body weight status and dietary intake
| Variable | r | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Protein (g) | 0.10 | 0.04 |
| Vitamin A (µg RE) | 0.16 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 0.22 | 0.000 |
| Vitamin B1(mg) | 0.11 | 0.000 |
| Vitamin B2 (mg) | 0.19 | 0.000 |
| Niacin (mg NE) | 0.11 | 0.047 |
| Calcium (mg) | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Iron (mg) | 0.15 | 0.04 |
Significant (p<0.05),
Significant (p<0.01),
Significant (P<0.001).
Figure 1Series figure of ‘Contour Drawing Rating Scale” (Thompson & Gray, 1994)
Association between perception of body weight and current body weight status (n = 296)
| Perception of body weight status | BMI of age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe thinness n (%) | Thinness n (%) | Normal n (%) | Overweight n (%) | Obese n (%) | |
| Under weight | 10 (22.7) | 12 (27.3) | 13 (29.6) | 6 (13.6) | 3 (6.80) |
| Normal weight | 20 (15.5) | 31 (24.0) | 42 (32.6) | 19 (14.7) | 17 (13.2) |
| Over weight/Obese | 25 (21.4) | 27 (20.5) | 40 (33.3) | 18 (13.7) | 13 (11.1) |