Khalid F Jamous1,2,3, Michael Kalloniatis1,2, Michael P Hennessy4, Ashish Agar4, Andrew Hayen5, Barbara Zangerl1,2. 1. Centre for Eye Health, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4. Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia. 5. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimizing patient management will reduce unnecessary vision loss in glaucoma through early detection. One method is the introduction of collaborative care schemes between optometrists and ophthalmologists. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of the Centre for Eye Health (CFEH) on glaucoma patient outcomes and management in primary optometric care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred to CFEH by optometrists for a glaucoma assessment were eligible for this study if written consent was provided (500 participants were randomly chosen). METHODS: Clinical data were classified according to disease risk and implemented patient care and analysed against the original diagnosis and patient parameters, followed by statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two main parameters were evaluated; suitable referral of patients for glaucoma condition assessment and appropriate implementation of follow-up care. RESULTS: The majority of patients referred for glaucoma assessment (86.2%) were classified as glaucoma suspects or likely to have glaucoma, indicating suitable referral of patients for a CFEH evaluation. Further, the involvement of CFEH resulted in a false positive rate of 7.8% for those patients who proceeded to ophthalmological care. However, long-term optometric patient care was not maintained for up to a third of primarily lower risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated collaborative eye health-care model led to a substantial improvement in appropriate referrals of glaucoma patients to ophthalmologists and could be suitable for optimizing patient care and utilization of resources. Improvement in follow-up of patients by optometrists is required to minimize inappropriately discontinued patient care.
BACKGROUND: Optimizing patient management will reduce unnecessary vision loss in glaucoma through early detection. One method is the introduction of collaborative care schemes between optometrists and ophthalmologists. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of the Centre for Eye Health (CFEH) on glaucomapatient outcomes and management in primary optometric care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred to CFEH by optometrists for a glaucoma assessment were eligible for this study if written consent was provided (500 participants were randomly chosen). METHODS: Clinical data were classified according to disease risk and implemented patient care and analysed against the original diagnosis and patient parameters, followed by statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two main parameters were evaluated; suitable referral of patients for glaucoma condition assessment and appropriate implementation of follow-up care. RESULTS: The majority of patients referred for glaucoma assessment (86.2%) were classified as glaucoma suspects or likely to have glaucoma, indicating suitable referral of patients for a CFEH evaluation. Further, the involvement of CFEH resulted in a false positive rate of 7.8% for those patients who proceeded to ophthalmological care. However, long-term optometric patient care was not maintained for up to a third of primarily lower risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated collaborative eye health-care model led to a substantial improvement in appropriate referrals of glaucomapatients to ophthalmologists and could be suitable for optimizing patient care and utilization of resources. Improvement in follow-up of patients by optometrists is required to minimize inappropriately discontinued patient care.
Authors: Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Clin Exp Optom Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Barbara Zangerl; Andrew Whatham; Juno Kim; Agnes Choi; Nagi N Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Clin Exp Optom Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Jaclyn Chiang; Michael Yapp; Angelica Ly; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Nayuta Yoshioka; Barbara Zangerl; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Sieu K Khuu; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jessie Huang; Paula Katalinic; Michael Kalloniatis; Michael P Hennessy; Barbara Zangerl Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.973