Literature DB >> 25362559

Surgical team composition has a major impact on effectiveness and costs in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot1, Michiel C Warlé, Michel F van der Jagt, Janneke P C Grutters, Sharon B C E van Horne, Heinrich J Kloke, Johannes A van der Vliet, Johan F Langenhuijsen, Frank C d'Ancona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limited evidence exists that optimization of surgical team composition may improve effectiveness of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with 541 consecutive LDNs. From 2003 to 2012, surgical team composition was gradually optimized with regard to the surgeons' experience, proficient assistance and the use of fixed teams.
RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed that a surgical team with an experienced surgeon had a significantly shorter operation time (OT) (-18 min, 95% CI -28 to -9), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (-64 mL, 95% CI -108 to -19) and shorter length of stay (LOS) (-1 day, 95% CI -1.6 to 0). Proficient assistance was also independently associated with a shorter OT (-43 min, 95% CI -53 to -33) and reduced EBL (-58 mL, 95% CI -109 to -6), whereas those procedures performed by fixed teams were related to a shorter operation (-50 min, 95% CI -59 to -43) and warm ischemia time (-1.8, 95% CI -2.1 to -1.5), a reduced mean complication grade (-0.14 per patient, 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02) and a shorter LOS (-1.1 day, 95% CI -1.7 to -05). Health care costs for LDN by one staff surgeon with unproficient assistance were 7.707 Euro, whereas costs for LDN by two staff surgeons in fixed teams were 5.614 Euro.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical team composition has a major impact on variables that reflect the effectiveness of LDN from the donors' perspective. Health care costs are lower for LDNs performed by two experienced surgeons in fixed team composition. We advocate the use of two experienced surgeons in fixed team composition for LDN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25362559     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1428-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tibério M Siqueira; Thomas A Gardner; Ramsay L Kuo; Ryan F Paterson; Larry H Stevens; James E Lingeman; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.

Authors:  Colin H Wilson; Aliu Sanni; David A Rix; Naeem A Soomro
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

Review 3.  Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: analysis of the existing literature.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; M Raschid Hoda; Antonio Alcaraz; Alexander Bachmann; Oliver W Hakenberg; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: is it really better?

Authors:  Eric Lechevallier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Cost-effectiveness of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized study.

Authors:  Karel W J Klop; Niels F M Kok; Leonienke F C Dols; Frank C d'Ancona; Eddy M M Adang; Janneke P C Grutters; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effects of learning curve on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  G L Martin; A I Guise; J E Bernie; V Bargman; W Goggins; C P Sundaram
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Volkan Tugcu; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey; Bircan Mutlu; Ali Ihsan Tasci
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of expertise.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Peter Werthemann; Hannes Cash; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Ahmed Magheli; Stefan Hinz; Johannes Waiser; Lutz Liefeldt; Kurt Miller; Serdar Deger; T Florian Fuller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison of two contemporary techniques.

Authors:  Abbey B Gershbein; Gerhard J Fuchs
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  How to Bring Surgery to the Next Level: Interpretable Skills Assessment in Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Kristen C Brown; Kiran D Bhattacharyya; Sue Kulason; Aneeq Zia; Anthony Jarc
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-10-28

2.  Perioperative Complications During Living Donor Nephrectomy: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Carlos Garcia-Ochoa; Liane S Feldman; Christopher Nguan; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Jennifer Arnold; Neil Boudville; Meaghan Cuerden; Christine Dipchand; Michael Eng; John Gill; William Gourlay; Martin Karpinski; Scott Klarenbach; Greg Knoll; Krista L Lentine; Charmaine E Lok; Patrick Luke; G V Ramesh Prasad; Alp Sener; Jessica M Sontrop; Leroy Storsley; Darin Treleaven; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-07-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.