Kimberly A Toussaint1, Jason C Gallagher2. 1. Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA toussaka@temple.edu. 2. Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence regarding the utility of the currently available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) as well as the emerging body of data for the novel agents in the pipeline. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search (1960-August 2014) was performed using the search terms β-lactamase, β-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam, avibactam, NXL104, MK-7655, and RPX7009. Current studies focusing on new agents were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations and meeting abstracts. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies pertaining to BLICs were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Historical clinical and in vitro data focusing on the characteristics of the conventional BLICs are reviewed. Avibactam, relebactam (formerly MK-7655), and RPX7009 are new β-lactamase inhibitors that are being studied in combination with β-lactams. Clinical and in vitro data that provide support for their use for multidrug-resistant organisms are reviewed. β-Lactam antibiotics are a mainstay for the treatment of many infections. The addition of β-lactamase inhibitors enhances their activity against organisms that produce β-lactamases; however, organisms that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases are proliferating. The BLICs (amoxicillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam) lack activity against some of these enzymes, presenting a critical need for new antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The historical BLICs are useful for many infections; however, evolving resistance limits their use. The new BLICs (combinations with avibactam, relebactam, and RPX7009) may be valuable options for patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms.
OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence regarding the utility of the currently available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) as well as the emerging body of data for the novel agents in the pipeline. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search (1960-August 2014) was performed using the search terms β-lactamase, β-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam, avibactam, NXL104, MK-7655, and RPX7009. Current studies focusing on new agents were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations and meeting abstracts. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies pertaining to BLICs were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Historical clinical and in vitro data focusing on the characteristics of the conventional BLICs are reviewed. Avibactam, relebactam (formerly MK-7655), and RPX7009 are new β-lactamase inhibitors that are being studied in combination with β-lactams. Clinical and in vitro data that provide support for their use for multidrug-resistant organisms are reviewed. β-Lactam antibiotics are a mainstay for the treatment of many infections. The addition of β-lactamase inhibitors enhances their activity against organisms that produce β-lactamases; however, organisms that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases are proliferating. The BLICs (amoxicillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam) lack activity against some of these enzymes, presenting a critical need for new antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The historical BLICs are useful for many infections; however, evolving resistance limits their use. The new BLICs (combinations with avibactam, relebactam, and RPX7009) may be valuable options for patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms.
Authors: Amabel Lapuebla; Marie Abdallah; Olawole Olafisoye; Christopher Cortes; Carl Urban; John Quale; David Landman Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Patrick M Barbour; Wei Wang; Le Chang; Kasey L Pickard; Rana Rais; Barbara S Slusher; Xiang Wang Journal: Adv Synth Catal Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: George G Zhanel; Courtney K Lawrence; Heather Adam; Frank Schweizer; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Michael Zhanel; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Andrew Walkty; Andrew Denisuik; Alyssa Golden; Alfred S Gin; Daryl J Hoban; Joseph P Lynch; James A Karlowsky Journal: Drugs Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Anthony M Nicasio; Brian D VanScoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira; Catharine C Bulik; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Sujata M Bhavnani; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Hanna Hakvoort; Evelyn Bovenkamp; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Jay N Mandrekar; Audrey N Schuetz; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sibylle H Lob; Meredith A Hackel; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Katherine Young; Mary R Motyl; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191