Literature DB >> 25361660

Face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site ™ instrumentation.

Anthony M Jarc1, Myriam Curet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validated training exercises are essential tools for surgeons as they develop technical skills to use robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical systems. The purpose of this study was to show face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci (®) Si surgical system configured with Single-Site (™) instrumentation.
METHODS: New (N = 21) and experienced (N = 6) surgeons participated in the study. New surgeons (11 Gynecology [GYN] and 10 General Surgery [GEN]) had not completed any da Vinci Single-Site cases but may have completed multiport cases using the da Vinci system. They participated in this study prior to attending a certification course focused on da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation. Experienced surgeons (5 GYN and 1 GEN) had completed at least 25 da Vinci Single-Site cases. The surgeons completed four inanimate training exercises and then rated them with a questionnaire. Raw metrics and overall normalized scores were computed using both video recordings and kinematic data collected from the surgical system.
RESULTS: The experienced surgeons significantly outperformed new surgeons for many raw metrics and the overall normalized scores derived from video review (p < 0.05). Only one exercise did not achieve a significant difference between new and experienced surgeons (p = 0.08) when calculating an overall normalized score using both video and advanced metrics derived from kinematic data. Both new and experienced surgeons rated the training exercises as appearing, to train and measure technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery and actually testing the technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the four training exercises showed face, content, and construct validity. Improved overall scores could be developed using additional metrics not included in this study. The results suggest that the training exercises could be used in an overall training curriculum aimed at developing proficiency in technical skills for surgeons new to da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361660     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3947-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform.

Authors:  Matthew Kroh; Kevin El-Hayek; Steven Rosenblatt; Bipan Chand; Pedro Escobar; Jihad Kaouk; Sricharan Chalikonda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Mukul B Patil; Pascal Zehnder; Jie Cai; Casey K Ng; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine M Gilberg-Fisher; Nabeel A Arain; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Georges-Pascal Haber; Michael A White; Riccardo Autorino; Pedro F Escobar; Matthew D Kroh; Sricharan Chalikonda; Rakesh Khanna; Sylvain Forest; Bo Yang; Fatih Altunrende; Robert J Stein; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Validation of surgical simulators.

Authors:  Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Myriam Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Vipul Patel; Richard Satava
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.547

8.  da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.

Authors:  Kyle T Finnegan; Anoop M Meraney; Ilene Staff; Steven J Shichman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator.

Authors:  Douglas C Kelly; Andrew C Margules; Chandan R Kundavaram; Hadley Narins; Leonard G Gomella; Edouard J Trabulsi; Costas D Lallas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Pascal Zehnder; Mukul B Patil; Jie Cai; Casey K Ng; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Swar H Shah; Troy Adebar; Eric Hwang; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.