Anna R Hemnes1, Aaron W Trammell2, Stephen L Archer2, Stuart Rich2, Chang Yu2, Hui Nian2, Niki Penner2, Mitchell Funke2, Lisa Wheeler2, Ivan M Robbins2, Eric D Austin2, John H Newman2, James West2. 1. From the Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine (A.R.H., A.W.T., N.P., M.F., L.W., I.M.R., J.H.N., J.W.) and Department of Biostatistics (C.Y., H.N.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (S.L.A.); Division of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (S.R.); and Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (E.D.A.). anna.r.hemnes@vanderbilt.edu. 2. From the Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine (A.R.H., A.W.T., N.P., M.F., L.W., I.M.R., J.H.N., J.W.) and Department of Biostatistics (C.Y., H.N.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (S.L.A.); Division of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (S.R.); and Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (E.D.A.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in response to treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major challenge to improving outcome in this disease. Although vasodilator-responsive PAH (VR-PAH) accounts for a minority of cases, VR-PAH has a pronounced response to calcium channel blockers and better survival than vasodilator-nonresponsive PAH (VN-PAH). We hypothesized that VR-PAH has a different molecular cause from VN-PAH that can be detected in the peripheral blood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Microarrays of cultured lymphocytes from VR-PAH and VN-PAH patients followed at Vanderbilt University were performed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction performed on peripheral blood for the 25 most different genes. We developed a decision tree to identify VR-PAH patients on the basis of the results with validation in a second VR-PAH cohort from the University of Chicago. We found broad differences in gene expression patterns on microarray analysis including cell-cell adhesion factors and cytoskeletal and rho-GTPase genes. Thirteen of 25 genes tested in whole blood were significantly different: EPDR1, DSG2, SCD5, P2RY5, MGAT5, RHOQ, UCHL1, ZNF652, RALGPS2, TPD52, MKNL1, RAPGEF2, and PIAS1. Seven decision trees were built with the use of expression levels of 2 genes as the primary genes: DSG2, a desmosomal cadherin involved in Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and RHOQ, which encodes a cytoskeletal protein involved in insulin-mediated signaling. These trees correctly identified 5 of 5 VR-PAH patients in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: VR-PAH and VN-PAH can be differentiated with the use of RNA expression patterns in peripheral blood. These differences may reflect different molecular causes of the 2 PAH phenotypes. This biomarker methodology may identify PAH patients who have a favorable treatment response.
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in response to treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major challenge to improving outcome in this disease. Although vasodilator-responsive PAH (VR-PAH) accounts for a minority of cases, VR-PAH has a pronounced response to calcium channel blockers and better survival than vasodilator-nonresponsive PAH (VN-PAH). We hypothesized that VR-PAH has a different molecular cause from VN-PAH that can be detected in the peripheral blood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Microarrays of cultured lymphocytes from VR-PAH and VN-PAHpatients followed at Vanderbilt University were performed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction performed on peripheral blood for the 25 most different genes. We developed a decision tree to identify VR-PAHpatients on the basis of the results with validation in a second VR-PAH cohort from the University of Chicago. We found broad differences in gene expression patterns on microarray analysis including cell-cell adhesion factors and cytoskeletal and rho-GTPase genes. Thirteen of 25 genes tested in whole blood were significantly different: EPDR1, DSG2, SCD5, P2RY5, MGAT5, RHOQ, UCHL1, ZNF652, RALGPS2, TPD52, MKNL1, RAPGEF2, and PIAS1. Seven decision trees were built with the use of expression levels of 2 genes as the primary genes: DSG2, a desmosomal cadherin involved in Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and RHOQ, which encodes a cytoskeletal protein involved in insulin-mediated signaling. These trees correctly identified 5 of 5 VR-PAHpatients in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS:VR-PAH and VN-PAH can be differentiated with the use of RNA expression patterns in peripheral blood. These differences may reflect different molecular causes of the 2 PAH phenotypes. This biomarker methodology may identify PAH patients who have a favorable treatment response.
Authors: Gérald Simonneau; Ivan M Robbins; Maurice Beghetti; Richard N Channick; Marion Delcroix; Christopher P Denton; C Gregory Elliott; Sean P Gaine; Mark T Gladwin; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Michael J Krowka; David Langleben; Norifumi Nakanishi; Rogério Souza Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Evan L Brittain; Meredith E Pugh; Lisa A Wheeler; Ivan M Robbins; James E Loyd; John H Newman; Emma K Larkin; Eric D Austin; Anna R Hemnes Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Mark M Awad; Darshan Dalal; Eunpi Cho; Nuria Amat-Alarcon; Cynthia James; Crystal Tichnell; April Tucker; Stuart D Russell; David A Bluemke; Harry C Dietz; Hugh Calkins; Daniel P Judge Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2006-04-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Eduardo Garcia-Gras; Raffaella Lombardi; Michael J Giocondo; James T Willerson; Michael D Schneider; Dirar S Khoury; Ali J Marian Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Lijiang Ma; Danilo Roman-Campos; Eric D Austin; Mélanie Eyries; Kevin S Sampson; Florent Soubrier; Marine Germain; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Alain Borczuk; Erika Berman Rosenzweig; Barbara Girerd; David Montani; Marc Humbert; James E Loyd; Robert S Kass; Wendy K Chung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Zhigang Hong; Andrew J Smith; Stephen L Archer; Xi-Chen Wu; Daniel P Nelson; Douglas Peterson; Gerhard Johnson; E Kenneth Weir Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David B Badesch; Gary E Raskob; C Greg Elliott; Abby M Krichman; Harrison W Farber; Adaani E Frost; Robyn J Barst; Raymond L Benza; Theodore G Liou; Michelle Turner; Scott Giles; Kathy Feldkircher; Dave P Miller; Michael D McGoon Journal: Chest Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Nicholas W Morrell; Serge Adnot; Stephen L Archer; Jocelyn Dupuis; Peter Lloyd Jones; Margaret R MacLean; Ivan F McMurtry; Kurt R Stenmark; Patricia A Thistlethwaite; Norbert Weissmann; Jason X-J Yuan; E Kenneth Weir Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher J Rhodes; Pablo Otero-Núñez; John Wharton; Emilia M Swietlik; Sokratis Kariotis; Lars Harbaum; Mark J Dunning; Jason M Elinoff; Niamh Errington; A A Roger Thompson; James Iremonger; J Gerry Coghlan; Paul A Corris; Luke S Howard; David G Kiely; Colin Church; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Mark Toshner; Stephen J Wort; Ankit A Desai; Marc Humbert; William C Nichols; Laura Southgate; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Richard C Trembath; Inga Prokopenko; Stefan Gräf; Nicholas W Morrell; Dennis Wang; Allan Lawrie; Martin R Wilkins Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason M Elinoff; Adrien J Mazer; Rongman Cai; Mengyun Lu; Grace Graninger; Bonnie Harper; Gabriela A Ferreyra; Junfeng Sun; Michael A Solomon; Robert L Danner Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Ann Chen Wu; James P Kiley; Patricia J Noel; Shashi Amur; Esteban G Burchard; John P Clancy; Joshua Galanter; Maki Inada; Tiffanie K Jones; Jonathan A Kropski; James E Loyd; Lawrence M Nogee; Benjamin A Raby; Angela J Rogers; David A Schwartz; Don D Sin; Avrum Spira; Scott T Weiss; Lisa R Young; Blanca E Himes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrew J Bryant; Chunhua Fu; Yuanquing Lu; Mark L Brantly; Borna Mehrad; Lyle L Moldawer; Todd M Brusko; Evan L Brittain; James D West; Eric D Austin; Rizwan Hamid Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Anna R Hemnes; Min Zhao; James West; John H Newman; Stuart Rich; Stephen L Archer; Ivan M Robbins; Timothy S Blackwell; Joy Cogan; James E Loyd; Zhongming Zhao; Christa Gaskill; Christopher Jetter; Jonathan A Kropski; Susan M Majka; Eric D Austin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: John H Newman; Stuart Rich; Steven H Abman; John H Alexander; John Barnard; Gerald J Beck; Raymond L Benza; Todd M Bull; Stephen Y Chan; Hyung J Chun; Declan Doogan; Jocelyn Dupuis; Serpil C Erzurum; Robert P Frantz; Mark Geraci; Hunter Gillies; Mark Gladwin; Michael P Gray; Anna R Hemnes; Roy S Herbst; Adrian F Hernandez; Nicholas S Hill; Evelyn M Horn; Kendall Hunter; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Roger Johns; Sanjay Kaul; Steven M Kawut; Tim Lahm; Jane A Leopold; Greg D Lewis; Stephen C Mathai; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Evangelos D Michelakis; Steven D Nathan; William Nichols; Grier Page; Marlene Rabinovitch; Jonathan Rich; Franz Rischard; Sharon Rounds; Sanjiv J Shah; Victor F Tapson; Naomi Lowy; Norman Stockbridge; Gail Weinmann; Lei Xiao Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405