Literature DB >> 25361490

In vivo measurement of the frame-based application accuracy of the Neuromate neurosurgical robot.

Daniel von Langsdorff1, Philippe Paquis, Denys Fontaine.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The application accuracy of the Neuromate neurosurgical robot has been validated in vitro but has not been evaluated in vivo for deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantations. The authors conducted a study to evaluate this application accuracy in routine frame-based DBS procedures, with an independent system of measurement.
METHODS: The Euclidian distance was measured between the point theoretically targeted by the robot and the point actually reached, based on their respective stereotactic coordinates. The coordinates of the theoretical target were given by the robot's dedicated targeting software. The coordinates of the point actually reached were recalculated using the Stereoplan localizer system. This experiment was performed in vitro, with the frame fixed in the robot space without a patient, for 21 points spatially distributed. The in vivo accuracy was then measured in 30 basal ganglia targets in 17 consecutive patients undergoing DBS for movement disorders.
RESULTS: The mean in vitro application accuracy was 0.44 ± 0.23 mm. The maximal localization error was 1.0 mm. The mean (± SD) in vivo application accuracy was 0.86 ± 0.32 mm (Δx = 0.37 ± 0.34 mm, Δy = 0.32 ± 0.24 mm, Δz = 0.58 ± 0.31 mm). The maximal error was 1.55 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo application accuracy of the Neuromate neurosurgical robot, measured with a system independent from the robot, in frame-based DBS procedures was better than 1 mm. This accuracy is at least similar to the accuracy of stereotactic frame arms and is compatible with the accuracy required in DBS procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DBS = deep brain stimulation; Neuromate robot; SEEG = stereoelectroencephalography; accuracy; deep brain stimulation; functional neurosurgery; stereotactic frame

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25361490     DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

1.  Modular robotic platform for precision neurosurgery with a bio-inspired needle: System overview and first in-vivo deployment.

Authors:  Riccardo Secoli; Eloise Matheson; Marlene Pinzi; Stefano Galvan; Abdulhamit Donder; Thomas Watts; Marco Riva; Davide Danilo Zani; Lorenzo Bello; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The Clinical Application of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  De-Feng Liu; Huan-Guang Liu; Kai Zhang; Fan-Gang Meng; An-Chao Yang; Jian-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Stereoelectroencephalography: Indication and Efficacy.

Authors:  Koji Iida; Hiroshi Otsubo
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Frameless stereotaxy in subthalamic deep brain stimulation: 3-year clinical outcome.

Authors:  Carla Piano; Francesco Bove; Delia Mulas; Anna Rita Bentivoglio; Beatrice Cioni; Tommaso Tufo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model.

Authors:  Andrea Spyrantis; Tirza Woebbecke; Daniel Rueß; Anne Constantinescu; Andreas Gierich; Klaus Luyken; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Eva Herrmann; Florian Gessler; Marcus Czabanka; Harald Treuer; Maximilian Ruge; Thomas M Freiman
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.493

6.  Techniques of Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation and Accuracy Compared with the Frame-Based Technique.

Authors:  Shanshan Mei; Kaijia Yu; Zhiwei Ren; Yongsheng Hu; Song Guo; Yongjie Li; Jianyu Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography.

Authors:  Lars E van der Loo; Olaf E M G Schijns; Govert Hoogland; Albert J Colon; G Louis Wagner; Jim T A Dings; Pieter L Kubben
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Early Deformation of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Following Surgical Implantation: Intracranial, Brain, and Electrode Mechanics.

Authors:  Frédéric Chapelle; Lucie Manciet; Bruno Pereira; Anna Sontheimer; Jérôme Coste; Youssef El Ouadih; Ruxandra Cimpeanu; Dimitri Gouot; Yuri Lapusta; Béatrice Claise; Valérie Sautou; Yassine Bouattour; Ana Marques; Adrien Wohrer; Jean-Jacques Lemaire
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 9.  How technology is driving the landscape of epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Christian Dorfer; Bertil Rydenhag; Gordon Baltuch; Vivek Buch; Jeffrey Blount; Robert Bollo; Jason Gerrard; Daniel Nilsson; Karl Roessler; James Rutka; Ashwini Sharan; Dennis Spencer; Arthur Cukiert
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.740

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.