Literature DB >> 25361481

Brief pain inventory--facial minimum clinically important difference.

Sukhmeet K Sandhu1, Casey H Halpern, Venus Vakhshori, Keyvan Mirsaeedi-Farahani, John T Farrar, John Y K Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Neurosurgeons are frequently the primary physicians measuring pain relief in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Unfortunately, the measurement of pain can be complex. The Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-Facial) is a reliable and validated multidimensional tool that consists of 18 questions. It measures 3 domains of pain: 1) pain intensity (worst and average pain intensity), 2) interference with general activities of daily living (ADL), and 3) face-specific pain interference. The objective of this paper is to determine the patient-reported minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using the BPI-Facial.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 234 patients with TN seen in a single neurosurgeon's office. Patients completed baseline and 1-month follow-up BPI-Facial questionnaires. The MCID was calculated using an anchor-based approach in which the defined anchor was the 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC). Two statistical methods were employed: mean change score and optimal cutoff point.
RESULTS: Using the mean change score method, the investigators calculated the MCID for the 3 domains of the BPIFacial: 44% and 30% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and average, respectively, 54% improvement in interference with general ADL, and 63% improvement in interference with facial ADL. Using the optimal cutoff point method, they also calculated the MCID for the 3 domains of the BPI-Facial: 57% and 28% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and average, respectively, 75% improvement in interference with general ADL, and 62% improvement in interference with facial ADL.
CONCLUSIONS: The BPI-Facial is a multidimensional pain scale that measures 3 domains of pain. Although 2 statistical methods were used to calculate the MCID, the optimal cutoff point method was the superior one because it used data from the majority of subjects included in this study. A 57% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and a 28% improvement in pain intensity at its average were the MCIDs for patients with facial pain. A greater improvement was needed to achieve the MCID for interference with general and facial ADL. A 75% improvement in interference with general ADL and a 62% improvement in interference with facial ADL were needed to achieve an MCID. While pain intensity is easier to measure, pain's interference with ADL may be more important for patient outcomes when designing or evaluating interventions in the field of TN. The BPI-Facial is a useful instrument to measure changes in multidimensional aspects of pain in patients with TN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADL = activities of daily living; AUC = area under the ROC curve; BPI = Brief Pain Inventory; Brief Pain Inventory; Brief Pain Inventory–Facial; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; PGIC = patient global impression of change; PRO = patient-reported outcome; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; TN = trigeminal neuralgia; facial pain; functional neurosurgery; minimum clinically important difference; trigeminal neuralgia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25361481     DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS132547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  A retrospective study of neurocombing for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression.

Authors:  X Liang; X Dong; S Zhao; X Ying; Y Du; W Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Design of Phase 3 Studies Evaluating Vixotrigine for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Mona Kotecha; William P Cheshire; Helen Finnigan; Kathryn Giblin; Himanshu Naik; Joanne Palmer; Simon Tate; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Impact of pain and postoperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures 5 years after microvascular decompression or partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Daniyal J Jafree; Amanda C Williams; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Clinically significant changes in pain along the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hidenori Suzuki; Shuichi Aono; Shinsuke Inoue; Yasuaki Imajo; Norihiro Nishida; Masahiro Funaba; Hidenori Harada; Aki Mori; Mishiya Matsumoto; Fumihiro Higuchi; Shin Nakagawa; Shu Tahara; Satoshi Ikeda; Hironori Izumi; Toshihiko Taguchi; Takahiro Ushida; Takashi Sakai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Burden of illness of trigeminal neuralgia among patients managed in a specialist center in England.

Authors:  Lasair O'Callaghan; Lysbeth Floden; Lisa Vinikoor-Imler; Tara Symonds; Kathryn Giblin; Chris Hartford; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  MRI Texture Analysis Reveals Brain Abnormalities in Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Hayden Danyluk; Abdullah Ishaque; Daniel Ta; Yee Hong Yang; B Matthew Wheatley; Sanjay Kalra; Tejas Sankar
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised.

Authors:  Tara Symonds; Jason A Randall; Deborah L Hoffman; Joanna M Zakrzewska; William Gehringer; John Yk Lee
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.