| Literature DB >> 25360262 |
Simone I Lang1, Rien Aerts2, Richard S P van Logtestijn2, Wenka Schweikert3, Thorsten Klahn3, Helen M Quested4, Jurgen R van Hal2, Johannes H C Cornelissen2.
Abstract
Nutrient resorption from senescing photosynthetic organs is a powerful mechanism for conserving class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) andEntities:
Keywords: Bryophyte; conducting tissue; evolutionary specialization; internal nutrient cycling; lichen; phylogeny; pteridophyte; senescence; translocation; vascular plant
Year: 2014 PMID: 25360262 PMCID: PMC4201435 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Vegetation on Andøya island, Norway, showing examples of subarctic species tested here for nutrient resorption efficiency in the Subarctic, as representatives of contrasting clades: mosses (Racomitrium lanuginosum), lichens (Cladonia stygia) and several vascular plant species (including Empetrum nigrum, Vaccinium uliginosum, Rubus chamaemorus, Andromeda polifolia). Photo by Marc Roβkopf.
Figure 2Nitrogen resorption efficiency (REN) expressed as REN% and RENsr at clade, class and order level across autotrophic sections of the Tree of Life (lichenized fungi and plants). Different letters indicate significance at P < 0.05 (Tukey, n = 2–20), with a, b, c and s, t, u used for REN% and RENsr, respectively.
Statistical analysis of differences in nitrogen resorption efficiency (REN) and phosphorus resorption efficiency (REP) at clade, class and order level across the autotrophic sections of the Tree of Life (lichenized fungi and plants; n = 2–20). Significant P-values are marked with bold letters. Note that the underlying species sets are more robust for REN than for REP since REP of vascular plant clades encompassed solely eudicots (or angiosperms)
| Clade | Taxonomic level | Source | d.f. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Clade | REN% | 7 | 15.03 | |
| RENsr | 7 | 19.94 | |||
| REP% | 2 | 2.80 | 0.073 | ||
| REPsr | 2 | 2.88 | 0.068 | ||
| Moss | Class | REN% | 2 | 3.98 | |
| RENsr | 2 | 2.79 | 0.089 | ||
| REP% | 2 | 0.78 | 0.47 | ||
| REPsr | 2 | 1.11 | 0.36 | ||
| Lichen | Order | REN% | 1 | 0.10 | 0.76 |
| RENsr | 1 | 0.45 | 0.51 | ||
| REP% | 1 | 5.48 | |||
| REPsr | 1 | 3.37 | 0.089 |
Ranked.
Eudicots.
Angiosperms (eudicots and monocots).
Figure 3Nsenesced (%) versus Ngreen (%), and Nsenesced/cellulose versus Ngreen/cellulose, across the basal clades of the Tree of Life (±SE; n = 8). Isoclines for REN% and RENsr are outlined in gray.