| Literature DB >> 25360188 |
Adam Kevin1, Marion Mutugi1, Peter Wanzala2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several high profile events of the last decade have served as catalysts for the now widely available prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV services. However, Kenya continues to face challenges in assuring that all women in need of PMTCT services receive the full package.Entities:
Keywords: Coast Provincial General Hospital; Human Immunodeficiency Virus; Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission; antenatal Care; antiretroviral
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25360188 PMCID: PMC4212433 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.4.3839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
| Variable | Category | n(%; 95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Single | 22 (15 [9 - 21]) | |
| Married | 99 (66 [58 - 74]) | |
| Separated/divorced | 11 ( 7 [4 - 13]) | |
| Widow | 5 ( 3 [1 - 8]) | |
| Cohabiting | 13 ( 9 [5 - 14]) | |
|
| ||
| Business | 50 (33 [26 - 41]) | |
| Casual | 15 (10 [6 - 16]) | |
| Salaried | 14 ( 9 [5 - 15]) | |
| Unemployed | 67 (45 [37 - 53]) | |
| Others | 4 ( 3 [1 - 7]) | |
|
| ||
| <3000 | 6 ( 4 [1 - 9]) | |
| 3001_6000 | 18 (12 [7 - 18]) | |
| 6001_9000 | 32 (21 [15 - 29]) | |
| >9000 | 27 (18 [12 - 25]) | |
| Missing | 67 (45 [37 - 53]) | |
|
| ||
| None | 25 (13 [8 - 18]) | |
| Primary | 85 (43 [36 - 50]) | |
| Secondary | 76 (38 [31 - 45]) | |
| College/University | 13 ( 7 [4 - 11]) | |
|
| ||
| Mean (SD) | 30[5] | |
|
| ||
| Mean (SD) | 4[2] |
Association between ANC factors and first PMTCT visit experience
| 1st PMTCT visit | 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n(%) | No n(%) | OR | Lower CI | Upper CI | P value | |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 26(17.6) | 28(57.1) | (base) | |||
| No | 122(82.4) | 21(42.9) | 6.26 | 3.09 | 12.68 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 13(8.8) | 12(24.5) | (base) | |||
| No | 135(91.2) | 37(75.5) | 3.37 | 1.42 | 8.00 | 0.006 |
|
| ||||||
| walking | 21(14.0) | 3(6.1) | (base) | |||
| car | 128(85.3) | 46(93.9) | 0.40 | 0.11 | 1.40 | 0.150 |
| others | 1(0.7) | 0(0.0) | (empty) | |||
|
| ||||||
| <30 min | 20(13.3) | 7(14.3) | (base) | |||
| 30 min | 27(18.0) | 14(28.6) | 0.68 | 0.23 | 1.98 | 0.474 |
| 30 min - 1 hr | 96(64.0) | 25(51.0) | 1.34 | 0.51 | 3.53 | 0.549 |
| 1 -2 hrs | 5(3.3) | 3(6.1) | 0.58 | 0.11 | 3.10 | 0.527 |
| 2- 3 hrs | 2(1.3) | 0(0.0) | (empty) | |||
|
| ||||||
| 10_50 | 38(29.00 | 23[50.0] | (base) | |||
| 50_100 | 80(61.1) | 21(45.7) | 2.31 | 1.14 | 4.67 | 0.020 |
| 100_200 | 12(9.2) | 2(4.3) | 3.63 | 0.75 | 17.70 | 0.111 |
| >200 | 1(0.8) | 0[0.0] | (empty) | |||
|
| ||||||
| <1hr | 71(47.7) | 16[32.7] | (base) | |||
| 1_2hrs | 68(45.6) | 25[51.0] | 0.61 | 0.30 | 1.25 | 0.177 |
| 2_3hrs | 8(5.4) | 7[14.3] | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.81 | 0.021 |
| >3hrs | 2(1.3) | 1[2.0] | 0.45 | 0.04 | 5.28 | 0.526 |
Association between utilization of Family planning services and first PMTCT visit experience
| 1st PMTCT visit | 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | Lower CI | Upper CI | P value | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Yes | 145(96.7) | 49(100.0) | ||||
| No | empty | |||||
| FP method | 5(3.3) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| Condom | 33(22.8) | 10(20.4) | (base) | |||
| Injection | 56(38.6) | 14(28.6) | 1.21 | 0.48 | 3.04 | 0.681 |
| Implant | 19(13.1) | 10(20.4) | 0.58 | 0.20 | 1.63 | 0.299 |
| Pills | 34(23.4) | 13(26.5) | 0.79 | 0.31 | 2.06 | 0.633 |
| permanent method | 1(0.7) | 1(2.0) | 0.30 | 0.02 | 5.29 | 0.413 |
| Others | 0.61 | 0.05 | 7.40 | 0.695 | ||
| Source of information on FP | 2(1.4) | 1(2.0) | ||||
| CPGH ANC | 44(30.3) | 22(44.9) | (base) | |||
| other hosp ANC | 14(9.70 | 14(28.60 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 1.23 | 0.131 |
| Church | 16(11.0) | 2(4.1) | 4.00 | 0.84 | 18.97 | 0.081 |
| Media | 24(16.6) | 3(6.10 | 4.00 | 1.08 | 14.75 | 0.037 |
| friends n Family | 36924.8) | 8(16.)] | 2.25 | 0.90 | 5.65 | 0.085 |
| school/college | 10(6.9) | 0(0.0) | (empty) | |||
| Others | (empty) | |||||
|
| 1(0.7) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| Yes | 91(60.7) | 44(89.8) | (base) | |||
| no | 59(39.3) | 5(10.2) | 5.71 | 2.14 | 15.22 | 0.001 |
Association between HIV testing information and first PMTCT visit experience
| 1st PMTCT visit | 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n (%) | No n (%) | OR | Lower CI | Upper CI | P value | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 146(97.3) | 46(97.9) | (base) | |||
| No | 4(2.7) | 1[2.1] | 1.26 | 0.14 | 11.56 | 0.838 |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 111(74.0) | 45(95.7) | (base) | |||
| No | 39(26.0) | 2(4.3) | 7.91 | 1.83 | 34.13 | 0.006 |
|
| ||||||
| First trimester | 67(61.5) | 21(48.8) | (base) | |||
| second trimester | 30(27.5) | 16(37.2) | 0.59 | 0.27 | 1.28 | 0.182 |
| third trimester | 12(11.0) | 6(14.0) | 0.63 | 0.21 | 1.88 | 0.404 |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 149(100.0) | 45(95.7) | ||||
| No | 0(0.0) | 2(4.3) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 143(96.0) | 46(97.9) | (base) | |||
| No | 6(4.0) | 1(2.1) | 1.93 | 0.23 | 16.45 | 0.548 |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 148(99.3) | 44(93.6) | (base) | |||
| No | 1(0.7) | 3(6.4) | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.048 |
|
| ||||||
| once | 102(68.5) | 22(46.8) | (base) | |||
| twice | 47(31.5) | 25(53.2) | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.79 | 0.008 |
Multivariate model for the independent predictors of undertaking the first PMTCT visit
| OR | Lower CI | Upper CI | P value | LRT P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.01 | 0.074 | 0.003 |
|
| |||||
| Yes | (base) | ||||
| No | 5.78 | 2.70 | 12.38 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| Yes | (base) | ||||
| No | 4.33 | 1.52 | 12.35 | 0.006 |