Literature DB >> 25359466

Transcriptional regulation of the waaAE-coaD operon by PhoP and RcsAB in Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus.

Lei Liu1, Nan Fang, Yicheng Sun, Huiying Yang, Yiquan Zhang, Yanping Han, Dongsheng Zhou, Ruifu Yang.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25359466      PMCID: PMC4259886          DOI: 10.1007/s13238-014-0110-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Cell        ISSN: 1674-800X            Impact factor:   14.870


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, is transmitted among mammals (including humans) primarily via the bite of infected fleas. Flea-borne transmission distinguishes Y. pestis from its progenitor Y. pseudotuberculosis, which is a mild food-borne pathogen (Zhou and Yang, 2011). In Y. pestis, transmission by fleas involves the synthesis of biofilms that physically block the flea’s proventriculus; Y. pseudotuberculosis does not produce biofilms in fleas (Zhou and Yang, 2011). Thus, biofilm formation may play a key role in virulence differences between the species. Regulator PhoP and sensor PhoQ constitute a two-component regulatory system (Groisman, 2001). Upon environmental stimuli (such as low magnesium concentration), PhoQ transfers a phosphate group to PhoP, allowing phosphorylated PhoP (PhoP-P) to act as a transcriptional regulator. Biofilm formation is regulated by the phosphorelay system, Rcs, which is composed of three proteins: RcsB, RcsC, and RcsD. RcsC acts as the sensor kinase that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group to RcsD and then RcsB. Phosphorylated RcsB (RcsB-P) acts as a transcriptional regulator either independently or upon binding with an auxiliary protein RcsA, which is present in Y. pseudotuberculosis but not Y. pestis. RcsAB tightly represses biofilm formation, while the lack of RcsA in the latter results in robust biofilm formation (Sun et al., 2008). Differences in the composition of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) coating of the two species may also play a role in differing virulence. Due to multiple mutations in the O-antigen gene cluster, Y. pestis fails to produce O-antigen, a structural component of lipopolysaccharide of Gram-negative bacteria (Prior et al., 2001). An important step of LPS biosynthesis is the 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid (Kdo) glycosylation of lipid A, which is catalyzed by the Kdo transferase WaaA (Tan and Darby, 2005). Deletion of waaA in Y. pestis leads to the reduced bacterial growth rates, a lack of Kdo in LPS, and a biofilm defect (Tan and Darby, 2005, 2006). Further study of WaaA may elucidate additional differences between the two species and their virulence. In the present work, the RT-PCR assay indicated that the three consecutive genes waaA, waaE, and coaD were transcribed as a single primary RNA (Fig. S1), and thereby these three genes constituted a three-gene operon in Y. pestis. The relative mRNA levels of waaA were measured using primer extension in the wild-type Y. pestisMicrotus strain 201(WT) grown at 26°C or 37°C (Fig. S2A). This assay detected a single transcriptional start site (nucleotide T) located 26 bp upstream of waaA, and thus a single promoter was identified for waaA under the growth conditions tested. Cells grown at 26°C had dramatically higher levels of waaA mRNA than cells grown at 37°C. These results were recapitulated using a waaA::lacZ fusion vector, containing the promoter for waaA fused to the coding region of lacZ. This upregulation between 37°C and 26°C could correlate with an upregulation in response to movement from the warm-blooded host (37°C) to the flea gut (26°C). Thus WaaA may be important in the transition between the two vectors. For all the following experiments, Y. pestis was cultivated at 26°C. Based on computational analysis, PhoP and RcsAB are predicted to bind the promoter proximal region of waaAE-coaD, suggesting that they may be transcriptional regulators of the operon. Primer extension experiments (Fig. 1A) indicate that a ΔphoP mutant has significantly lower waaA mRNA levels compared to WT at 26°C. A waaA::lacZ fusion strain (Fig. 1B) showed that waaA promoter activity was significantly reduced in ΔphoP relative to WT. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) (Fig. 1C) denoted that the purified His-PhoP protein was able to bind to the waaA promoter-proximal DNA in a dose-dependent manner; in contrast, His-PhoP did not bind the 16S rRNA gene at any concentration. Subsequent DNase I footprinting experiments (Fig. 1D) disclosed that His-PhoP protected a single region, located from 176 bp to 130 bp upstream of waaA in a dose-dependent manner. This region contained a predicted PhoP box-like sequence. Thus, PhoP positively controls waaA transcription through binding to the waaA promoter-proximal region.
Figure 1

Positive regulation ofby PhoP. The positive and minus numbers in the brackets indicated the nucleotide positions upstream and downstream of waaA, respectively. (A) Primer extension. Lanes C, T, A, and G represented Sanger sequencing reactions. The primer extension products and the sequence ladders were analyzed with an 8 mol/L urea-6% acrylamide sequencing gel. The transcriptional start site of waaA was indicated by arrows with nucleotides. (B) LacZ fusion. The waaA:lacZ transcriptional fusion vector was transformed into indicated Y. pestis strains, and then the waaA promoter activities (the miller units of β-galactosidase activity) were determined in the cellular extracts. (C) EMSA. The radioactively labeled DNA fragments were incubated with increasing amounts of purified His-PhoP protein and then subjected to a native 4% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. (D) DNase I footprinting. Labeled coding or non-coding DNA probes were incubated with increasing amounts of purified His-PhoP and then subjected to DNase I footprinting assay. The footprint regions were indicated with vertical bars. Lanes G, A, T, and C represented Sanger sequencing reactions

Positive regulation ofby PhoP. The positive and minus numbers in the brackets indicated the nucleotide positions upstream and downstream of waaA, respectively. (A) Primer extension. Lanes C, T, A, and G represented Sanger sequencing reactions. The primer extension products and the sequence ladders were analyzed with an 8 mol/L urea-6% acrylamide sequencing gel. The transcriptional start site of waaA was indicated by arrows with nucleotides. (B) LacZ fusion. The waaA:lacZ transcriptional fusion vector was transformed into indicated Y. pestis strains, and then the waaA promoter activities (the miller units of β-galactosidase activity) were determined in the cellular extracts. (C) EMSA. The radioactively labeled DNA fragments were incubated with increasing amounts of purified His-PhoP protein and then subjected to a native 4% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. (D) DNase I footprinting. Labeled coding or non-coding DNA probes were incubated with increasing amounts of purified His-PhoP and then subjected to DNase I footprinting assay. The footprint regions were indicated with vertical bars. Lanes G, A, T, and C represented Sanger sequencing reactions We created three strains to analyze the effect of RscA on binding of RscB to the waaA promoter: 1) rcsA-c containing endogenous RcsB and plasmid-borne RscA, 2) ΔrcsB lacking both RcsA and RscB, and 3) rcsA-c/ΔrcsB containing only plasmid-borne RscA. Compared to WT, rcsA-c had considerably lower levels of waaA mRNA, while ΔrcsB and rcsA-c/ΔrcsB had considerably higher levels of waaA mRNA (Fig. 2A). The waaA::lacZ fusion vector was introduced into the above strains, and the measurement of waaA promoter activity further confirmed the above primer extension results (Fig. 2B). To determine whether RcsA affects binding affinity of RcsB to the waaA promoter-proximal region, EMSAs were performed (Fig. 2C). His-RcsB-P alone or mixed with excess MBP-RcsA could bind to the waaA promoter-proximal region in a dose-dependent manner. Full DNA retardation occurred at 15 pmol with His-RcsB-P alone, whereas it was observed at 6 pmol with His-RcsB-P in presence of MBP-RcsA. These confirmed that the presence of RcsA could improve the DNA-binding activity of RcsB-P. In order to determine the location of the RcsAB binding site, DNase I footprinting experiments were performed with both coding and non-coding strands of the waaA promoter-proximal DNA fragment (Fig. 2D). The results showed that His-RcsB-P in the presence of MBP-RcsA protected a single region located from 41 to 18 bp upstream of waaA. This region contained a predicted RcsAB box-like sequence. Thus, RcsB represses waaA transcription by binding the promoter-proximal of waaA in conjunction with RcsA.
Figure 2

Negative regulation ofby RcsAB. See Fig. 1 for the annotations of primer extension (A), LacZ fusion (B), EMSA (C), and DNase I footprinting (D) experiments. The DNA binding of His-RcsB-P in presence of MBP-RcsA (involved in EMSA and DNase I footprinting) or that of His-RcsB-P alone (EMSA) to indicated target DNA probes was tested

Negative regulation ofby RcsAB. See Fig. 1 for the annotations of primer extension (A), LacZ fusion (B), EMSA (C), and DNase I footprinting (D) experiments. The DNA binding of His-RcsB-P in presence of MBP-RcsA (involved in EMSA and DNase I footprinting) or that of His-RcsB-P alone (EMSA) to indicated target DNA probes was tested The structural organization of the PhoP- and RcsAB-dependent promoter of waaA was reconstructed based on the collected data of translation/transcription starts, predicted core promoter −10 and −35 elements, predicted Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences for ribosomal binding, PhoP and RcsAB sites, and PhoP and RcsAB box-like sequences (Fig. S3). The in vitro biofilm masses produced by WT could be steadily stained with crystal violet (CV) staining. Compared to WT and the complement strain C-waaA (that showed similar levels of CV staining), ΔwaaA stained considerably. As expected, almost no CV staining was detected for the biofilm-negative reference strain ΔhmsS (Fig. S4A). Strains were incubated with nematode eggs. In the WT strain, there was abundant attachment of Y. pestis biofilms on nematode heads, allowing only a small portion (about 25%) of larvae to develop into L4/adult nematodes. In contrast, the bacterial lawns of ΔwaaA and ΔhmsS allowed growth of 90% and 100% of nematodes, respectively (Fig. S4B). These confirmed that deletion of waaA led to a huge biofilm defect in Y. pestis biovar Microtus, which was consistent with the previous findings observed in biovar Medievalis (Tan and Darby, 2006). When grown on LB agar, WT and C-waaA presented a wrinkled colony morphology due to abundant biofilm exopolysaccharide. Both ΔwaaA and ΔhmsS produced very smooth colonies (Fig. S4C). This distinction indicated that deletion of waaA resulted in a major decrease in exopolysaccharide production. This would account for the biofilm-defective phenotype of ΔwaaA. The arabinose 5-phosphate (A5P) isomerase YrbH, which catalyzes the conversion of ribulose 5-phosphate into A5P, the first committed step in the Kdo biosynthesis, is required for Y. pestis biofilm formation (Tan and Darby, 2006). Although both of the waaA and yrbH single-gene mutants produce a truncated LPS lacking Kdo, the biofilm defects of these two strains are not identical: no trace of biofilm can be detected for the yrbH mutant, but small biofilms are consistently observed for the waaA mutant (Tan and Darby, 2006). The phosphoheptose isomerase GmhA, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of the conserved heptose component of LPS oligosaccharide core, is also required for Y. pestis biofilm formation and flea blockage (Darby et al., 2005). The exopolysaccharide synthesized in Y. pestis cells must be exported through the outer membrane, of which the predominant component is LPS. It is hypothesized that the alteration to produce a truncated LPS lacking Kdo or heptose would be most likely a cause of the dysfunction of biofilm exopolysaccharide transportation pathway in Y. pestis. In addition to regulation of waaA, RcsAB is also known to bind to the hmsT promoter-proximal region to repress the transcription of hmsT, a gene encoding the diguanylate cyclase that is responsible for the biosynthesis of 3′,5′-cyclic diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP, a second messenger promoting the production of biofilm matrix exopolysaccharide) (Sun et al., 2012). Thus, RcsAB acts as a master repressor of Yersinia biofilm production through inhibiting the expression of multiple biofilm determinants including at least HmsT and WaaA. Expression of PhoP/PhoQ is induced in flea gut, where it promotes the formation of flea-borne infectious Y. pestis biofilms (Rebeil et al., 2013). Nevertheless, PhoP/PhoQ has no regulatory effect on the expression of hmsHFRS, an operon responsible for synthesis and translocation of biofilm matrix exopolysaccharides through the cell envelope (Bobrov et al., 2008). Additionally, there is no regulatory effect on hmsHFRS-depedent pigmentation. Moreover, PhoPQ-dependent lipid A modification, which is known to promote antimicrobial peptide resistance, plays no role in contribution of PhoP/PhoQ to Y. pestis biofilm formation in fleas (Rebeil et al., 2013). Data presented here indicates that waaA is a major determinant of Y. pestis biofilm production, and that waaAE-coaD is positively regulated by PhoP in a direct manner. Thus, PhoP is an important determinant of biofilm production in Yersinia and may play a role in the difference between the species Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 454 kb)
  10 in total

Review 1.  The pleiotropic two-component regulatory system PhoP-PhoQ.

Authors:  E A Groisman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The Yersinia pestis Rcs phosphorelay inhibits biofilm formation by repressing transcription of the diguanylate cyclase gene hmsT.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Sun; Xiao-Peng Guo; B Joseph Hinnebusch; Creg Darby
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Yersinia pestis is viable with endotoxin composed of only lipid A.

Authors:  Li Tan; Creg Darby
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Yersinia pestis YrbH is a multifunctional protein required for both 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid biosynthesis and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Li Tan; Creg Darby
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Induction of the Yersinia pestis PhoP-PhoQ regulatory system in the flea and its role in producing a transmissible infection.

Authors:  Roberto Rebeil; Clayton O Jarrett; James D Driver; Robert K Ernst; Petra C F Oyston; B Joseph Hinnebusch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The failure of different strains of Yersinia pestis to produce lipopolysaccharide O-antigen under different growth conditions is due to mutations in the O-antigen gene cluster.

Authors:  J L Prior; J Parkhill; P G Hitchen; K L Mungall; K Stevens; H R Morris; A J Reason; P C Oyston; A Dell; B W Wren; R W Titball
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 7.  Formation and regulation of Yersinia biofilms.

Authors:  Dongsheng Zhou; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 14.870

8.  Identification of gmhA, a Yersinia pestis gene required for flea blockage, by using a Caenorhabditis elegans biofilm system.

Authors:  Creg Darby; Sandya L Ananth; Li Tan; B Joseph Hinnebusch
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Insights into Yersinia pestis biofilm development: topology and co-interaction of Hms inner membrane proteins involved in exopolysaccharide production.

Authors:  Alexander G Bobrov; Olga Kirillina; Stanislav Forman; Dietrich Mack; Robert D Perry
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Experimental evidence for negative selection in the evolution of a Yersinia pestis pseudogene.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Sun; B Joseph Hinnebusch; Creg Darby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Transcriptional Regulation Between the Two Global Regulators RovA and CRP in Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Haihong Fang; Yinjuan Ding; Yaqiong Zheng; Liping Cai; Shangen Zheng; Yiquan Zhang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Reciprocal regulation of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation and virulence by RovM and RovA.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Haihong Fang; Huiying Yang; Yiquan Zhang; Yanping Han; Dongsheng Zhou; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.411

3.  CRP Is an Activator of Yersinia pestis Biofilm Formation that Operates via a Mechanism Involving gmhA and waaAE-coaD.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Haihong Fang; Huiying Yang; Yiquan Zhang; Yanping Han; Dongsheng Zhou; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  RcsAB and Fur Coregulate the Iron-Acquisition System via entC in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 in Response to Iron Availability.

Authors:  Lingyue Yuan; Xuan Li; Ling Du; Kewen Su; Jiaxue Zhang; Pin Liu; Qiang He; Zhongshuang Zhang; Dan Peng; Lifei Shen; Jingfu Qiu; Yingli Li
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  BfvR, an AraC-Family Regulator, Controls Biofilm Formation and pH6 Antigen Production in Opposite Ways in Yersinia pestis Biovar Microtus.

Authors:  Haihong Fang; Lei Liu; Yiquan Zhang; Huiying Yang; Yanfeng Yan; Xiaojuan Ding; Yanping Han; Dongsheng Zhou; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.