| Literature DB >> 25359417 |
Clémence Desjardin, Julie Riviere, Anne Vaiman, Caroline Morgenthaler, Mathieu Diribarne, Michel Zivy, Céline Robert, Laurence Le Moyec, Laurence Wimel, Olivier Lepage, Claire Jacques, Edmond Cribiu, Laurent Schibler1.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <span class="Disease">Osteochondrosis (OC(D)) is a juvenile osteo-articular disorder affecting several mammalian species. In horses, OC(D) is considered as a multifactorial disease and has been described as a focal disruption of endochondral ossification leading to the development of osteoarticular lesions. Nevertheless, OC(D) physiopathology is poorly understood. Affected horses may present joint swelling, stiffness and lameness. Thus, OC(D) is a major concern for the equine industry. Our study was designed as an integrative approach using omics technologies for the identification of constitutive defects in epiphyseal cartilage and/or subchondral bone associated with the development of primary lesions to further understand OC(D) pathology. This study compared samples from non-affected joints (hence lesion-free) from OC(D)-affected foals (n = 5, considered predisposed samples) with samples from OC-free foals (n = 5) considered as control samples. Consequently, results are not confounded by changes associated with the evolution of the lesion, but focus on altered constitutive molecular mechanisms. Comparative proteomics and micro computed tomography analyses were performed on predisposed and OC-free bone and cartilage samples. Metabolomics was also performed on synovial fluid from OC-free, OC(D)-affected and predisposed joints.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25359417 PMCID: PMC4233069 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Study design. Ten foals were allocated to two groups based on clinical and radiographic assessment: OC-free (n = 5) and OC-affected (n = 5). OC foals presented at least one talocrural lesion whereas femoropatellar joints were normal. Lesions were sampled and classified histologically. Explants comprising both cartilage and 5 mm of subchondral bone were harvested on femoropatellar joints and considered as healthy samples if retrieved from OC-free foals and as predisposed samples if retrieved from OC-affected foals. Samples were used for comparative proteomics and micro computed tomography (μCT). Tibiotarsal joint synovial fluids were also collected from OC-free and OC(D)-affected foals (affected limb and contralateral non-affected limb for foals non-bilaterally affected) and used for comparative metabolomics. Blue arrows correspond to OC-free samples, purple arrows to predisposed samples and red arrows to OC(D)-affected samples.
Figure 2Identification and characterization of OC(D) lesion subtypes. Upper Panels - Macroscopic views of the talus trochlea of one OC-free and five OC-affected foals. Two major types of osteochondrosis lesions could be distinguished: cartilage fragments corresponding to OCD lesions (horses OC1, OC2, and OC4; open arrows) and osteochondral defect corresponding to OC lesions with varying degrees of cartilage loss (horses OC3, OC5, and OC4; black arrow). Lower Panels - Histological views of osteochondrosis lesions (light green/safranin-O stain). Irregularities and reduced thickness were observed at the cartilage surface. The absence of staining both in and close to the lesion indicates reduction in proteoglycan content. Abnormal cartilage cores were also seen in the subchondral bone (black arrows).
Figure 3Investigation of type-VI collagen localization and chondrocyte organization. Upper Panel - Type-VI collagen localization by immunostaining. Both lesion types (OCD [f] and osteochondral defects (OC) [s]) were characterized by positively stained areas (arrows) indicative of cartilage dedifferentiation leading to the formation of local scar tissue (fibrocartilage). Lower Panel - Magnification views (x20) of animals OC1-OC4 showing chondrocyte clusters located surrounding or close to the lesions , which may reflect a healing process is underway.
Figure 4Statistical distinction between OC-free (n = 5) and OC(D)-predisposed (n = 5) bone and cartilage samples. (A) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Proteomic Data. The PCA reveals a great heterogeneity between predisposed samples in both cartilage and bone. Furthermore, OCD samples (horses OC1, OC2 and OC4) cluster near healthy samples in bone, in contrast to OC (osteochondral defects) (horses OC3 and OC5). This suggests that OCD may result mainly from a cartilage defect, whereas OC may result from a combined cartilage and bone defect. (B) Hierarchical Clustering (HCL) of Proteomic Data. Differentially expressed spots (97 in cartilage, 126 in bone) between healthy OC-free (n = 5) and predisposed (n = 5) samples collected from OC-affected and OC-free foals were used to perform HCL. A distinction could be made between OC-affected and OC-free foals, as well as OCD and OC (osteochondral defects) in both cartilage and bone. In addition, OCD-affected foals have similar profile to OC-free foals based on their bone proteome, suggesting that this lesion subtype shows only a minor defect in bone.
Figure 5Comparison of subchondral bone structure using micro computed tomography (μCT). μCT analyses were performed to compare the subchondral bone structure between healthy (n = 5) and predisposed samples (n = 5). Five parameters were measured: the bone mineral density (BMD), the ratio between bone volume and total volume (BV/TV), the trabecular thickness (Tb,th), the trabecular number (Tb.nb) and the trabecular spacing (Tb,sp). Between-class correspondence analysis highlighted BMD, Tb,nb and Tb.sp as discriminating parameters between OC-affected and OC-free samples. Hierarchical clustering (A) based on these parameters showed that OCD-predisposed samples (horses OC1, OC2 and OC4) were clustered with healthy samples, whereas OC-predisposed samples (OC3 and OC5) were clustered separately. These observations suggested that OC-predisposed samples presented modified bone structure. The measures of the ratios between means of healthy and each predisposed group (B) seemed to confirm this assumption. The data suggested that the BMD and the Tb,nb were reduced in subchondral bone predisposed samples from osteochondral defect-affected foals, whereas Tb.sp was increased. Interestingly, the μCt analysis did not reveal any variation in bone-predisposed samples from OCD-affected foals.
Figure 6Metabolomic study of synovial fluid. Synovial fluids were collected from tibiotarsal joints from OC-free and OC-affected foals. When possible, synovial fluid from OC foals was also collected from the contralateral healthy joint. Synovial fluids were analyzed by NMR metabolomics and a PCA based on obtained spectra was performed (A) The score Plot of the PCA Model shows discrimination between healthy, OCD-affected and OC-affected joints, but not between healthy joints from OC-affected (OC1_L and OC2_L) and OC-free foals. L = left joint; R = right joint; OF = OC-free foal; OC = affected foal; Blue: healthy joint; Green: OC lesion (osteochondral defects); Red: OCD lesion (fragments). (B) Proton NMR spectrum of synovial fluid (upper graph) and loading plot (lower graph) of the first principal components obtained with the PCA model. The importance of the buckets (y-axis) is plotted as a function of their chemical shift (x-axis). The corresponding metabolites are increasing along the component when positive and decreasing along the component when negative. Metabolite attributions: 1: branched-chain amino acids including valine, leucine, and isoleucine; 2: lactic acid; 3: alanine; 4: acetic acid; 5: acetone; 6: pyruvic acid; 7: trimethylamine; 8: creatine; 9: glucose; 10: aromatic amino acids including tyrosine and phenylalanine.