| Literature DB >> 25359354 |
Martha Torres1, Lourdes García-García2, Pablo Cruz-Hervert3, Heinner Guio4, Claudia Carranza1, Leticia Ferreyra-Reyes1, Sergio Canizales3, Susana Molina3, Elizabeth Ferreira-Guerrero3, Norma Téllez3, Rogelio Montero-Campos3, Guadalupe Delgado-Sánchez3, Norma Mongua-Rodriguez3, Jose Sifuentes-Osornio5, Alfredo Ponce-de Leon5, Eduardo Sada1, Douglas B Young6, Robert J Wilkinson7.
Abstract
Treatment of persons with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection at greatest risk of reactivation is an important component of TB control and elimination strategies. Biomarkers evaluating the effectiveness of treatment of latent TB infection have not yet been identified. This information would enhance control efforts and assist the evaluation of new treatment regimes. We designed a two-group, two-arm, randomised clinical study of tuberculin skin test-positive participants: 26 with documented contact with TB patients and 34 with non-documented contact. Participants in each group were randomly assigned to the immediate- or deferred-isoniazid treatment arms. Assays of in vitro interferon (IFN)-γ secretion in response to recombinant Rv1737 and overlapping synthetic peptide pools from various groups of immunodominant proteins were performed. During isoniazid therapy, a significant increase from baseline in the proportion of IFN-γ responders to the 10-kDa culture filtrate protein, Rv2031, Rv0849, Rv1986, Rv2659c, Rv2693c and the recombinant Rv1737 protein was observed (p⩽0.05). The peptide pool of Rv0849 and Rv1737 recombinant proteins induced the highest percentage of IFN-γ responders after isoniazid therapy. The in vitro IFN-γ responses to these proteins might represent useful markers to evaluate changes associated with treatment of latent TB infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25359354 PMCID: PMC4318657 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00123314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 16.671
Peptide sequences
| MTEQQWNFAG IEAAASAIQG NVTSIHSLLD EGKQSLTKLA AAWGGSGSEA YQGVQQ | 15 | 5 | ||
| SGSEA YQGVQQ KWDATATELNNALQ NLARTISEAG QAMASTEGNV TGMFA | 15 | 5 | ||
| MAEMKTDAAT LAQEAGNFER ISGDLKTQID QVESTAGSLQ GQWRGAAGTA AQAAV | 15 | 5 | ||
| AAGTA AQAAV VRFQEAANKQKQELD EISTNIRQAG VQYSRADEEQ QQALSSQMGF | 15 | 5 | ||
| Rv0081 | MESEPLYKLK AEFFKTLAHP ARIRILELLV ERDRSVGELL SSDVGLESSN LSQQLGVLRR AGVVAARRDG NAMIYSIAAP DIAELLAVAR KVLARVLSDR VAVLEDLRAG GSAT | 20 | 10 | |
| Rv0569 | MKAKVGDWLV IKGATIDQPD HRGLIIEVRS SDGSPPYVVR WLETDHVATV IPGPDAVVVT AEEQNAADER AQHRFGAVQS AILHARGT | 20 | 10 | |
| MATTLPVQRH PRSLFPEFSE LFAAFPSFAG LRPTFDTRLM RLEDEMKEGR YEVRAELPGV DPDKDVDIMV RDGQLTIKAE RTEQKDFDGR SEFAYGSFVR TVSLPVGADE DDIKATYDKG ILTVSVAVSE GKPTEKHIQI RSTN | 20 | 10 | ||
| MSQIMYNYPA MLGHAGDMAG YAGTLQSLGA EIAVEQAALQ SAWQGDTGIT YQAWQAQWNQ AMEDLVRAYH AMSSTHEANT MAMMARDTAE AAKWGG | 20 | 10 | ||
| MSQIMYNYPA MMAHAGDMAG YAGTLQSLGA DIASEQAVLS SAWQGDTGIT YQGWQTQWNQ ALEDLVRAYQ SMSGTHESNT MAMLARDGAE AAKWGG | 20 | 10 | ||
| Rv0826 | TELPKPPFAQ RVPDWLWAAP RKLLARFFVW LTVGLYDPPV RELMGYRWLR RDEWLHRRFG DIVRLVFALVPFRFRKHPRA RAGWDRATGR IPADAPLVQT PARNLPPPDE RDNPTHYCPK V | 20 | 10 | |
| Rv0849 | LPSVLIAAAA TGFAGALFNPAVRGYLAAEA GERKIEAFAM FNVFYQSGIL LGPLVGLVLL ALDFRITVLA AAGVFGLLTVAQLVALPQHR ADSEREKTSI | 20 | 10 | |
| MNSPLVVGFL ACFTLIAAIG AQNAFVLRQG IQREHVLPVV ALCTVSDIVL IAAGIAGFGA LIGAHPRALN VVKFGGAAFL IGYGLLAARR AWRPVALIPS | 20 | 10 | ||
| GATPVRLAEV LVTCAAFTFL NPHVYLDTVV LLGALANEHS DQRWLFGLGA VTASAVWFAT LGFGAGRLRG FTNPGSWRILDGLIAVMMV ALGISLTVT | 20 | 10 | ||
| Rv2659c | AAVRRWYATT AVGTPTMRAH SYSLLRAIMQ TALADDLIDS NPCRISGAST ARRVHKIRPATLDELETITK AMPDPYQAFV LMAAWLAMRY GELTELRRKD IDLHGEVARV RRAVVRVGEG | 20 | 10 | |
| Rv2659c | MNANRTSAQR LLAQAGGVSG LVYSSLPVVT FVVASSAAGL LPAIGFALSM AGLILLWRLL RRESARPVVA GFCGVAVCAL IAYLVGQSKG YFLLGIWMSL LWAVVFTLSI LIRRPIVGYL | 20 | 10 | |
ESAT-6: 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target; CFP-10: 10-kDa culture filtrate protein.
FIGURE 1Flow diagram of study population. a) Documented contacts. b) Non-documented contacts.
Demographic characteristics of the study population
| 34/60 (56.67) | 9/18 (50) | 2/8 (13.33) | 0.234 | 20/26 (76.92) | 3/8 (37.50) | 0.037 | 0.028 | |
| 36 (23.5–48) | 25 (16–37) | 20.5 (16–30.5) | 0.358 | 45.5 (32–50) | 46 (29.5–50.5) | 0.823 | <0.001 | |
| 49/60 (81.7) | 15/18 (83.3) | 7/8 (87.5) | 0.786 | 21/26 (80.8) | 6/8 (75) | 0.724 | 0.926 | |
| 12 (11–14) | 11 (10–14) | 11.5 (10.5–12) | 0.932 | 13 (12–14) | 15 (12–16) | 0.161 | 0.014 | |
| 13/60 (21.7) | 3/18 (16.7) | 2/8 (25) | 0.619 | 7/26 (26.9) | 1/8 (12.5) | 0.4 | 0.768 | |
| 20/60 (33.3) | 4/18 (22.2) | 2/8 (25) | 0.877 | 9/26 (34.6) | 5/8 (62.5) | 0.161 | 0.228 | |
| 25/60 (41.7) | 7/18 (38.9) | 2/8 (25) | 0.492 | 11/26 (42.3) | 5/8 (62.5) | 0.317 | 0.493 | |
| 17/60 (28.3) | 6/18 (33.3) | 3/8 (37.5) | 0.837 | 4/26 (15.4) | 4/8 (50) | 0.044 | 0.208 |
Data are presented as n/N (%) or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. p-values were calculated using the Chi-squared test unless otherwise stated. BCG: bacille Calmette–Guérin; TST: tuberculin skin test. #:documented contact, immediate treatment; ¶:documented contact, deferred treatment; +:non-documented contact, immediate treatment; §:non-documented contact, deferred treatment; ƒ:p-values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney test.
FIGURE 2a) Interferon (IFN)-γ response to the pooled peptides assessed, comparing subjects with and without household contact with a patient with active tuberculosis (TB). b) Percentage of IFN-γ responders (>100 pg·mL−1) comparing subjects with and without household contact with a patient with active TB. c) IFN-γ response to tested antigens among contacts who were assigned to deferred treatment, comparing the response 3 months before initiating treatment with that on treatment initiation. d) Percentage of IFN-γ responders to the assessed antigens among subjects who were assigned to deferred treatment, comparing the response 3 months before initiating treatment with that on treatment initiation. No significant differences in the amount of IFN-γ production or the proportion of individuals responding to peptide pools was observed between documented and non-documented contacts. Among individuals whose isoniazid treatment was deferred, with the exception of CFP-10-2, there was no difference in IFN-γ secretion or the proportion of participants responding to peptide pools at the two different time-points. Tx: treatment; ESAT-6: 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target; CFP-10: 10-kDa culture filtrate protein; PPD: purified protein derivative.
Proportion of responders to each peptide pool and Rv1737 protein, and multivariate analysis of changes throughout treatment among antigens showing significant variation compared with baseline
| 17 | 34 | 22 | 22 | 18 | 21 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 3.82 (1.45–10.03) | 0.006 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.30 (0.58–2.91) | 0.514 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 1.38 (0.48–3.98) | 0.547 | ||||||
| 28 | 49 | 31 | 32 | 27 | 48 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 4.04 (1.62–10.07) | 0.003 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.07 (0.52–2.22) | 0.836 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 3.82 (1.46–9.98) | 0.006 | ||||||
| 45 | 58 | 48 | 52 | 67 | 69 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 2.23 (1.01–4.94) | 0.046 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.74 (0.93–3.26) | 0.081 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 3.04 (1.28–7.22) | 0.012 | ||||||
| 31 | 49 | 32 | 33 | 43 | 50 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 3.26 (1.42–7.46) | 0.005 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.41 (0.72–2.75) | 0.303 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 2.64 (1.11–6.28) | 0.028 | ||||||
| 45 | 58 | 39 | 40 | 52 | 54 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 2.31 (1.06–5.03) | 0.034 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.01 (0.55–1.87) | 0.958 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 1.45 (0.64–3.77) | 0.372 | ||||||
| 5 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 15 | 10 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 6.81 (1.88–24.60) | 0.003 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 2.87 (0.89–9.17) | 0.075 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 1.87 (0.43–8.03) | 0.399 | ||||||
| 24 | 41 | 31 | 28 | 43 | 48 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 2.72 (1.19–6.19) | 0.017 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 1.79 (0.91–3.49) | 0.086 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 3.48 (1.47–8.23) | 0.004 | ||||||
| 56 | 66 | 61 | 68 | 78 | 88 | |||
| Baseline | Ref. | |||||||
| 1 week | 2.56 (0.91–7.16) | 0.073 | ||||||
| 4–26 weeks | 2.81 (1.23–6.41) | 0.014 | ||||||
| 40 weeks | 11.85 (3.20–43.83) | <0.001 | ||||||
These multivariable, random-effects logistic regression models were controlled for age, sex, documented or non-documented contacts, immediate or deferred treatment, degree of smear positivity of the index case, and phytohaemagglutinin as a measure of cell viability. aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CFP-10: 10-kDa culture filtrate protein; RD: region of difference; EHR: enduring hypoxic response. #: >100 pg·mL−1 interferon-γ.
FIGURE 3Percentage of interferon-γ responders during and after isoniazid treatment. a) Percentage of responders to ESAT-6-1, ESAT-6-2, ESAT-6-1 or ESAT-6-2 (labelled as ESAT-6), CFP-10-1, CFP-10-2, CFP10-1 or CFP10-2 (labelled as CFP-10), and combined ESAT-6 or CFP-10 remained similar during and after treatment. b) Responses to Rv0081, Rv0569 and Rv2031 were lower than responses to antigens shown in panel a. The percentage of responders remained stable or slightly increased during or after treatment. c) Responses to Rv0288c and Rv3019c decreased during or after treatment. d) Responses to antigens Rv0826, Rv0849, Rv1986-1, Rv1986-2, Rv2659c and Rv2693c tended to increase during and after treatment. e) Response to Rv1737, purified protein derivative (PPD) and phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). ESAT-6: 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target; CFP-10: 10-kDa culture filtrate protein.