Christian C Joyal1, Amélie Cossette, Vanessa Lapierre. 1. Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Philippe-Pinel Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although several theories and treatment plans use unusual sexual fantasies (SF) as a way to identify deviancy, they seldom describe how the fantasies referred to were determined to be unusual. AIM: The main goal of this study was to determine which SF are rare, unusual, common, or typical from a statistical point of view among a relatively large sample of adults recruited from the general population. A secondary goal was to provide a statistical comparison of the nature and intensity of sexual fantasies for men and women. This study also aims at demonstrating with both quantitative and qualitative analyses that certain fantasies often considered to be unusual are common. METHODS: An Internet survey was conducted with 1,516 adults (799 ♀; 717 ♂) who ranked 55 different SF and wrote their own favorite SF. Each SF was rated as statistically rare (2.3% or less), unusual (15.9% or less), common (more than 50%), or typical (more than 84.1% of the sample). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An extended version of the Wilson's Sex Fantasy Questionnaire with an open question. RESULTS: Only two sexual fantasies were found to be rare for women or men, while nine others were unusual. Thirty sexual fantasies were common for one or both genders, and only five were typical. These results were confirmed with qualitative analyses. Submission and domination themes were not only common for both men and women, but they were also significantly related to each other. Moreover, the presence of a single submissive fantasy was a significant predictor of overall scores for all SF in both genders. CONCLUSION: Care should be taken before labeling an SF as unusual, let alone deviant. It suggested that the focus should be on the effect of a sexual fantasy rather than its content.
INTRODUCTION: Although several theories and treatment plans use unusual sexual fantasies (SF) as a way to identify deviancy, they seldom describe how the fantasies referred to were determined to be unusual. AIM: The main goal of this study was to determine which SF are rare, unusual, common, or typical from a statistical point of view among a relatively large sample of adults recruited from the general population. A secondary goal was to provide a statistical comparison of the nature and intensity of sexual fantasies for men and women. This study also aims at demonstrating with both quantitative and qualitative analyses that certain fantasies often considered to be unusual are common. METHODS: An Internet survey was conducted with 1,516 adults (799 ♀; 717 ♂) who ranked 55 different SF and wrote their own favorite SF. Each SF was rated as statistically rare (2.3% or less), unusual (15.9% or less), common (more than 50%), or typical (more than 84.1% of the sample). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An extended version of the Wilson's Sex Fantasy Questionnaire with an open question. RESULTS: Only two sexual fantasies were found to be rare for women or men, while nine others were unusual. Thirty sexual fantasies were common for one or both genders, and only five were typical. These results were confirmed with qualitative analyses. Submission and domination themes were not only common for both men and women, but they were also significantly related to each other. Moreover, the presence of a single submissive fantasy was a significant predictor of overall scores for all SF in both genders. CONCLUSION: Care should be taken before labeling an SF as unusual, let alone deviant. It suggested that the focus should be on the effect of a sexual fantasy rather than its content.
Authors: Jannis Engel; Andrea Kessler; Maria Veit; Christopher Sinke; Ivo Heitland; Jonas Kneer; Uwe Hartmann; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: J Behav Addict Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 6.756
Authors: Pablo Vallejo-Medina; Laurent Marchal-Bertrand; Mayra Gómez-Lugo; José Pedro Espada; Juan Carlos Sierra; Franklin Soler; Alexandra Morales Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240