Literature DB >> 25358531

Decoding of motor intentions from epidural ECoG recordings in severely paralyzed chronic stroke patients.

M Spüler1, A Walter, A Ramos-Murguialday, G Naros, N Birbaumer, A Gharabaghi, W Rosenstiel, M Bogdan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, there have been several approaches to utilize a brain-computer interface (BCI) for rehabilitation with stroke patients or as an assistive device for the paralyzed. In this study we investigated whether up to seven different hand movement intentions can be decoded from epidural electrocorticography (ECoG) in chronic stroke patients. APPROACH: In a screening session we recorded epidural ECoG data over the ipsilesional motor cortex from four chronic stroke patients who had no residual hand movement. Data was analyzed offline using a support vector machine (SVM) to decode different movement intentions. MAIN
RESULTS: We showed that up to seven hand movement intentions can be decoded with an average accuracy of 61% (chance level 15.6%). When reducing the number of classes, average accuracies up to 88% can be achieved for decoding three different movement intentions. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings suggest that ipsilesional epidural ECoG can be used as a viable control signal for BCI-driven neuroprosthesis. Although patients showed no sign of residual hand movement, brain activity at the ipsilesional motor cortex still shows enough intention-related activity to decode different movement intentions with sufficient accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25358531     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/066008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  12 in total

1.  A testbed for optimizing electrodes embedded in the skull or in artificial skull replacement pieces used after injury.

Authors:  JingLe Jiang; Amar R Marathe; Jennifer C Keene; Dawn M Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

4.  Classifying multiple types of hand motions using electrocorticography during intraoperative awake craniotomy and seizure monitoring processes-case studies.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Dingguo Zhang; Zehan Wu; Liang Chen; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Hybrid Neuroprosthesis for the Upper Limb: Combining Brain-Controlled Neuromuscular Stimulation with a Multi-Joint Arm Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Florian Grimm; Armin Walter; Martin Spüler; Georgios Naros; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  What Turns Assistive into Restorative Brain-Machine Interfaces?

Authors:  Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Prediction of movement intention using connectivity within motor-related network: An electrocorticography study.

Authors:  Byeong Keun Kang; June Sic Kim; Seokyun Ryun; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Brain state-dependent robotic reaching movement with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton: combining brain-machine interfacing and robotic rehabilitation.

Authors:  Daniel Brauchle; Mathias Vukelić; Robert Bauer; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Multi-contact functional electrical stimulation for hand opening: electrophysiologically driven identification of the optimal stimulation site.

Authors:  Cristiano De Marchis; Thiago Santos Monteiro; Cristina Simon-Martinez; Silvia Conforto; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Brain-Machine Neurofeedback: Robotics or Electrical Stimulation?

Authors:  Robert Guggenberger; Monika Heringhaus; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.