Stéphane Renaud1, Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz2, Anne Olland1, Mickaël Schaeffer3, Jérémie Reeb1, Nicola Santelmo1, Gilbert Massard1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France pierre-emmanuel.falcoz@wanadoo.fr. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Data on thoracic lymph node involvement (LNI) in lung metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 6 to 40%. We aimed to evaluate whether there are subgroups of patients according to the lymph node ratio (LNR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 106 patients who underwent a thoracic procedure for CRC lung metastasis with pathologically proven thoracic LNI. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the median OS was significantly poorer for a pN2 location of LNI (26 vs 16 months, P = 0.04), LNR ≥50% (30 vs 17 months, P = 0.005), high preoperative CEA (32 vs 16 months, P = 0.02), hepatic metastases (27 vs 11 months, P <0.0001) and disease-free survival < 24 months (32 vs 17 months, P = 0.05). When pN1 and pN2 patients were staged according to the LNR, the median OS was significantly better for an LNR <50% (27 vs 17 months for pN1, 32 vs 12 months for pN2, P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, a high preoperative CEA [hazard ratio (HR): 2.256 (1.051-4.841), P = 0.04], pN1 status [HR: 0.337 (0.162-0.7), P = 0.004] and the absence of hepatic metastases [HR: 0.395 (0.180-0.687), P = 0.02] remained significant prognostic factors. There was an upward trend for patients with LNR <50% [HR: 0.565 (0.296-1.082), P = 0.08]. Otherwise, low LNR was significantly associated with a decreased risk of loco-regional recurrence (HR: 0.36, 95% confidence intervals: 0.14-0.96, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The LNR seems to be a more reliable prognostic factor than LNI for CRC lung metastasis. Prospective studies are necessary.
OBJECTIVES: Data on thoracic lymph node involvement (LNI) in lung metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 6 to 40%. We aimed to evaluate whether there are subgroups of patients according to the lymph node ratio (LNR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 106 patients who underwent a thoracic procedure for CRC lung metastasis with pathologically proven thoracic LNI. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the median OS was significantly poorer for a pN2 location of LNI (26 vs 16 months, P = 0.04), LNR ≥50% (30 vs 17 months, P = 0.005), high preoperative CEA (32 vs 16 months, P = 0.02), hepatic metastases (27 vs 11 months, P <0.0001) and disease-free survival < 24 months (32 vs 17 months, P = 0.05). When pN1 and pN2patients were staged according to the LNR, the median OS was significantly better for an LNR <50% (27 vs 17 months for pN1, 32 vs 12 months for pN2, P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, a high preoperative CEA [hazard ratio (HR): 2.256 (1.051-4.841), P = 0.04], pN1 status [HR: 0.337 (0.162-0.7), P = 0.004] and the absence of hepatic metastases [HR: 0.395 (0.180-0.687), P = 0.02] remained significant prognostic factors. There was an upward trend for patients with LNR <50% [HR: 0.565 (0.296-1.082), P = 0.08]. Otherwise, low LNR was significantly associated with a decreased risk of loco-regional recurrence (HR: 0.36, 95% confidence intervals: 0.14-0.96, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The LNR seems to be a more reliable prognostic factor than LNI for CRC lung metastasis. Prospective studies are necessary.