| Literature DB >> 25358420 |
Jun Koarashi1, Mariko Atarashi-Andoh1, Erina Takeuchi1, Syusaku Nishimura1.
Abstract
The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant caused serious radiocesium ((137)Cs) contamination of forest ecosystems located in mountainous and hilly regions with steep terrain. To understand topographic effects on the redistribution and accumulation of (137)Cs on forest floor, we investigated the distribution of Fukushima-derived (137)Cs in forest-floor litter layers on a steep hillslope in a Japanese deciduous forest in August 2013 (29 months after the accident). Both leaf-litter materials and litter-associated (137)Cs were accumulated in large amounts at the bottom of the hillslope. At the bottom, a significant fraction (65%) of the (137)Cs inventory was observed to be associated with newly shed and less degraded leaf-litter materials, with estimated mean ages of 0.5-1.5 years, added via litterfall after the accident. Newly emerged leaves were contaminated with Fukushima-derived (137)Cs in May 2011 (two months after the accident) and (137)Cs concentration in them decreased with time. However, the concentrations were still two orders of magnitude higher than the pre-accident level in 2013 and 2014. These observations are the first to show that (137)Cs redistribution on a forested hillslope is strongly controlled by biologically mediated processes and continues to supply (137)Cs to the bottom via litterfall at a reduced rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25358420 PMCID: PMC4215300 DOI: 10.1038/srep06853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Location of the Ogawa Forest Reserve (a) and a photograph of the forested hillslope (b) investigated in this study.
The 137Cs inventory map (a) was generated using the website “Extension Site of Distribution Map of Radiation Dose, etc.” prepared by MEXT, Japan40. Photograph by E. Takeuchi.
Figure 2Examples of litter materials in four litter fractions.
(a) Leaves showing no visible signs of degradation (F1); (b) chipped or degraded leaves >3 cm × 3 cm in size (F2) and (c) <3 cm × 3 cm in size (F3); and (d) fine leaf fragments <1 cm × 1 cm in size, including macroscopically unrecognizable materials (F4).
Figure 3Inventories of leaf-litter materials (a) and 137Cs (b) in litter fractions (F1 to F4) at three slope positions.
Concentrations of 137Cs, carbon (C), and nitrogen (N), and estimated mean ages of litter fractions at three slope positions
| Slope position | Litter fraction | 137Cs concentration (Bq kg−1 dw) | C content (%) | N content (%) | C/N ratio | Mean age of litter materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 m | F1 | 3203 ± 667 | 44.1 ± 0.3 | 1.51 ± 0.19 | 29.6 ± 4.1 | 0.5–1.2 |
| F2 | 3416 ± 765 | 41.9 ± 3.1 | 1.58 ± 0.10 | 26.5 ± 0.4 | 1.0–1.1 | |
| F3 | 5973 ± 1994 | 37.3 ± 4.9 | 1.58 ± 0.17 | 23.5 ± 0.8 | 1.3–1.6 | |
| F4 | 6085 ± 2217 | 27.2 ± 8.6 | 1.23 ± 0.34 | 22.0 ± 1.4 | 1.5–2.4 | |
| 8 m | F1 | 2454 ± 920 | 35.9 ± 2.4 | 1.45 ± 0.10 | 24.8 ± 1.3 | 1.1–1.5 |
| F2 | 2543 ± 710 | 34.3 ± 2.3 | 1.50 ± 0.08 | 23.0 ± 1.7 | 1.3–2.1 | |
| F3 | 3309 ± 1069 | 30.3 ± 0.7 | 1.46 ± 0.03 | 20.8 ± 0.3 | 2.2–2.5 | |
| F4 | 4163 ± 969 | 17.7 ± 1.6 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 17.7 ± 0.9 | >3.0 | |
| Bottom | F1 | 1606 ± 442 | 46.0 ± 0.3 | 1.40 ± 0.04 | 32.8 ± 0.9 | 0.5–0.6 |
| F2 | 2178 ± 856 | 44.9 ± 1.6 | 1.57 ± 0.10 | 28.7 ± 2.6 | 0.6–1.1 | |
| F3 | 3232 ± 550 | 40.0 ± 3.0 | 1.59 ± 0.01 | 25.2 ± 1.9 | 1.0–1.5 | |
| F4 | 3819 ± 1347 | 35.4 ± 7.8 | 1.49 ± 0.26 | 23.6 ± 1.9 | 1.2–1.9 |
aEstimated based on the C/N ratios of litter fractions. See “Methods” for details.
bMean and standard deviation for three replicate samples (n = 3).
Radiocesium concentrations of an archived litter sample and fresh beech leaf samples
| Sampling date | Sample type | Height (m) | 137Cs concentration (Bq kg−1 dw) | 134Cs concentration (Bq kg−1 dw) | 134Cs/137Cs | Detailed conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 23, 2007 | Litter | NA | 5.0 ± 1.2 | ND | ND | |
| May 17, 2011 | Leaves | 1.5 | 3310 ± 100 | 3160 ± 175 | 0.95 | |
| Leaves | <0.5 | 1790 ± 27 | 1760 ± 49 | 0.98 | ||
| October 1, 2013 | Leaves | 1–3 | 557 ± 9 | 260 ± 8 | 0.47 | |
| May 2, 2014 | Leaves | 3–5 | 792 ± 39 | 333 ± 31 | 0.42 | At 12 m above the bottom |
| Leaves | 3–5 | 875 ± 47 | 309 ± 33 | 0.35 | At 12 m above the bottom, washed with water | |
| Leaves | 3 | 286 ± 24 | 113 ± 20 | 0.40 | At 8 m above the bottom | |
| Leaves | 3 | 316 ± 27 | 131 ± 22 | 0.42 | At 8 m above the bottom, washed with water | |
| Leaves | 2–3 | 362 ± 33 | 128 ± 27 | 0.35 | At the bottom | |
| Leaves | 2–3 | 433 ± 37 | 152 ± 28 | 0.35 | At the bottom, washed with water |
aSamples were collected on the hillslope in May 2014, around the hillslope (not on the hillslope) in October 2013, and ~180 m away from the hillslope in January 2007 and May 2011.
bNot available because this is a litter sample collected from a forest floor.
cErrors represent counting errors in the radiation measurement.
dNot determined: 134Cs concentration was less than the lowest detectable concentration, and therefore 134C/137Cs ratio was not determined.
Figure 4Relationship between mean age and 137Cs inventory for litter fractions (F1 to F4) at three slope positions.