| Literature DB >> 25358328 |
C L F Katiyatiya1, V Muchenje1, A Mushunje1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the perceptions and knowledge of farmers of heat stress and tick resistance in cattle. A cross-sectional survey was conducted and 110 farmers in four villages in the sour and sweet velds of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa were interviewed. The associations among area (municipality), gender, age, level of education, employment and religion were computed using Chi-square tests. The majority of the respondents had on average 4 bulls, 4 cows, 4 heifers, 4 calves, and 4 oxen. Milk was considered as the major (28.3%) reason for keeping cattle. Most farmers owned non-descript (72.6%), and Nguni (45.3%) cattle because of their heat tolerance (54.7%), tick resistance (54.7%), and milking ability (28.2%) traits. Excessive panting (56.6%) and disease transmission (76%) were regarded as the major effects of heat stress and tick infestation in cattle, respectively. About 50% of the respondents agreed that hair length influences tick resistance and 47.17% considered coat colour when acquiring cattle. In the sampled areas, ticks were prevalent in the summer season (93%), and 77.36% of the respondents use acaricides every fortnight. Gall sickness was reported to be a major problem in the cattle herds by 36.79% of the respondents. Our results showed that farmers in the two municipalities had knowledge of cattle adaptation to heat stress and tick resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Herd Composition; Nguni; Non-descript Genotype; Season; Socio-demography
Year: 2014 PMID: 25358328 PMCID: PMC4213713 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Demography of cattle farmers in the Nkonkobe and Mnquma municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province
| Items | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 64.15 |
| Female | 35.85 |
| Total | 100 |
| Age | |
| 20–29 | 6.60 |
| 30–50 | 26.42 |
| 51–60 | 30.19 |
| >60 | 36.79 |
| Total | 100 |
| Level of education | |
| Tertiary | 16.04 |
| Secondary | 43.40 |
| Primary | 35.85 |
| No formal education | 4.72 |
| Total | 100 |
| Employment | |
| Farming | 27.36 |
| Employed | 13.21 |
| Self employed | 25.47 |
| Grant/pension receiver | 33.96 |
| Total | 100 |
| Religion | |
| Christianity | 74.53 |
| Traditionalism | 24.53 |
| Other | 0.94 |
| Total | 100 |
Figure 1Farmers’ herd compositions and sizes (percentages).
Proportion (%) of various uses of cattle in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
| Socio-economic purpose | Frequency | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Skin | 2 | 1.89 |
| Manure | 4 | 3.77 |
| Draught | 8 | 7.55 |
| Meat | 10 | 9.43 |
| Milk | 30 | 28.3 |
| Status quo | 7 | 6.6 |
| Dowry (lobola) | 5 | 4.72 |
| Ceremonies | 12 | 11.32 |
| Sales | 28 | 26.42 |
Cattle breeds kept by farmers and reasons for keeping the specific breeds
| Breed | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Brahman | 22 | 18.8 |
| Bonsmara | 5 | 4.7 |
| Angus | 1 | 0.9 |
| Nguni | 48 | 45.3 |
| Shorthorn | 5 | 4.7 |
| Non-descript | 77 | 72.6 |
| Reason for keeping specific breed(s) | ||
| Heat tolerance | 58 | 54.7 |
| Milking ability | 33 | 28.2 |
| Tick resistance | 58 | 54.7 |
| Meat quality | 25 | 23.6 |
| Temperament | 23 | 21.7 |
| Fertility | 28 | 26.4 |
| Traditionalism (ugqirha) | 1 | 0.9 |
Means some of the farmers kept more than one cattle breed.
Figure 2Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge on heat stress and its implications on cattle.
Figure 3Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge on ticks and their implications on cattle.
Figure 4Farmers’ perceptions on coat characteristics and their relation to heat stress and ticks.
Figure 5Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge of seasonal tick prevalence.
Figure 6Methods used by farmers to control tick infestation in cattle.
Figure 7Farmers’ response to how often they practice tick control on their cattle.
Figure 8Farmer’s response on tick-borne disease prevalence.
Association between demographic information and reasons for keeping specific cattle breeds
| Demographic factor | Heat tolerance | Milking ability | Tick tolerance | Meat quality | Temperament | Fertility | Traditionalism | Knowledge on adaptation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | ** | NS | ** | NS | NS | * | NS | NS |
| Gender | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Level of education | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * |
| Employment | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | NS |
Significant at * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, but NS not significant at p≥0.05.
Association between demographic information and effects of heats stress in cattle
| Demographic actor | Excessive panting | Loss of weight | Reduced milk production | Reduced breeding efficiency | Reduced feed intake | Death | Coat colour | Hair length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | NS |
| Gender | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS |
| Age | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | NS | NS |
| Level of education | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | * |
Significant at * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, but NS not significant at p≥0.05.
Association of demographic information and effects of ticks on cattle
| Demographic factor | Tick worry | Reduced feed intake | Disease transmission | Undesired meat quality | Death | Coat colour | Hair length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | NS | * | *** | NS | NS | * | NS |
| Gender | * | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Level of education | NS | NS | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Employment | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS |
Significant at * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, but NS not significant at p≥0.05.