Literature DB >> 25358070

Improved management of acute asthma among pregnant women presenting to the ED.

Kohei Hasegawa1, Rita K Cydulka2, Ashley F Sullivan3, Mark I Langdorf4, Stephanie A Nonas5, Richard M Nowak6, Nancy E Wang7, Carlos A Camargo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A multicenter study in the late 1990s demonstrated suboptimal emergency asthma care for pregnant women in US EDs. After a decade, follow-up data are lacking. We aimed to examine changes in emergency asthma care of pregnant women since the 1990s.
METHODS: We combined data from four multicenter observational studies of ED patients with acute asthma performed in 1996 to 2001 (three studies) and 2011 to 2012 (one study). We restricted the data so that comparisons were based on the same 48 EDs in both time periods. We identified all pregnant patients aged 18 to 44 years with acute asthma. Primary outcomes were treatment with systemic corticosteroids in the ED and, among those sent home, at ED discharge.
RESULTS: Of 4,895 ED patients with acute asthma, the analytic cohort comprised 125 pregnant women. Between the two time periods, there were no significant changes in patient demographics, chronic asthma severity, or initial peak expiratory flow. In contrast, ED systemic corticosteroid treatment increased significantly from 51% to 78% across the time periods (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.27-7.60; P = .01); systemic corticosteroids at discharge increased from 42% to 63% (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.97-6.37; P = .054). In the adjusted analyses, pregnant women in recent years were more likely to receive systemic corticosteroids, both in the ED (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.63-13.9; P = .004) and at discharge (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.05-9.61; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Between the two time periods, emergency asthma care in pregnant women significantly improved. However, with one in three pregnant women being discharged home without systemic corticosteroids, further improvement is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25358070     DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

Review 1.  Medical problems in pregnancy.

Authors:  Bhaskar Narayan; Catherine Nelson-Piercy
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Impact of Insurance Instability and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalizations for Patients with Asthma.

Authors:  Sucharita Kher; Amy M LeClair; Lori Lyn Price; Norma Terrin; Nancy Kressin; Amresh Hanchate; Jillian Suzukida; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-05

Review 3.  Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies.

Authors:  Philippe Le Conte; Nicolas Terzi; Guillaume Mortamet; Fekri Abroug; Guillaume Carteaux; Céline Charasse; Anthony Chauvin; Xavier Combes; Stéphane Dauger; Alexandre Demoule; Thibaut Desmettre; Stephan Ehrmann; Bénédicte Gaillard-Le Roux; Valérie Hamel; Boris Jung; Sabrina Kepka; Erwan L'Her; Mikaël Martinez; Christophe Milési; Élise Morawiec; Mathieu Oberlin; Patrick Plaisance; Robin Pouyau; Chantal Raherison; Patrick Ray; Mathieu Schmidt; Arnaud W Thille; Jennifer Truchot; Guillaume Valdenaire; Julien Vaux; Damien Viglino; Guillaume Voiriot; Bénédicte Vrignaud; Sandrine Jean; Eric Mariotte; Pierre-Géraud Claret
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  Managing asthma in pregnancy.

Authors:  Vanessa E Murphy
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Association of Insurance Status with Severity and Management in ED Patients with Asthma Exacerbation.

Authors:  Kohei Hasegawa; Samantha J Stoll; Jason Ahn; Rashid F Kysia; Ashley F Sullivan; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.