Alexander Chen1, Nicholas Pastis2, Brian Furukawa2, Gerard A Silvestri2. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: achen@dom.wustl.edu. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic navigation has improved the diagnostic yield of peripheral bronchoscopy for pulmonary nodules. For these procedures, a thin-slice chest CT scan is performed prior to bronchoscopy at full inspiration and is used to create virtual airway reconstructions that are used as a map during bronchoscopy. Movement of the lung occurs with respiratory variation during bronchoscopy, and the location of pulmonary nodules during procedures may differ significantly from their location on the initial planning full-inspiratory chest CT scan. This study was performed to quantify pulmonary nodule movement from full inspiration to end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing in patients undergoing electromagnetic navigation procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of electromagnetic navigation procedures was performed for which two preprocedure CT scans were performed prior to bronchoscopy. One CT scan was performed at full inspiration, and a second CT scan was performed at end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing. Pulmonary lesions were identified on both CT scans, and distances between positions were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-five pulmonary lesions were identified in 46 patients. Average motion of all pulmonary lesions was 17.6 mm. Pulmonary lesions located in the lower lobes moved significantly more than upper lobe nodules. Size and distance from the pleura did not significantly impact movement. CONCLUSIONS: Significant movement of pulmonary lesions occurs between full inspiration and end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing. This movement from full inspiration on planning chest CT scan to tidal volume breathing during bronchoscopy may significantly affect the diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy procedures.
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic navigation has improved the diagnostic yield of peripheral bronchoscopy for pulmonary nodules. For these procedures, a thin-slice chest CT scan is performed prior to bronchoscopy at full inspiration and is used to create virtual airway reconstructions that are used as a map during bronchoscopy. Movement of the lung occurs with respiratory variation during bronchoscopy, and the location of pulmonary nodules during procedures may differ significantly from their location on the initial planning full-inspiratory chest CT scan. This study was performed to quantify pulmonary nodule movement from full inspiration to end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing in patients undergoing electromagnetic navigation procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of electromagnetic navigation procedures was performed for which two preprocedure CT scans were performed prior to bronchoscopy. One CT scan was performed at full inspiration, and a second CT scan was performed at end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing. Pulmonary lesions were identified on both CT scans, and distances between positions were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-five pulmonary lesions were identified in 46 patients. Average motion of all pulmonary lesions was 17.6 mm. Pulmonary lesions located in the lower lobes moved significantly more than upper lobe nodules. Size and distance from the pleura did not significantly impact movement. CONCLUSIONS: Significant movement of pulmonary lesions occurs between full inspiration and end-exhalation during tidal volume breathing. This movement from full inspiration on planning chest CT scan to tidal volume breathing during bronchoscopy may significantly affect the diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy procedures.
Authors: Lonny B Yarmus; Christopher Mallow; Nicholas Pastis; Jeffrey Thiboutot; Hans Lee; David Feller-Kopman; Andrew D Lerner; Nicole Tanner; Gerard Silvestri; Alexander Chen Journal: Respiration Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: Roy W Semaan; Hans J Lee; David Feller-Kopman; Andrew D Lerner; Christopher M Mallow; Jeffrey Thiboutot; Sixto A Arias; Lonny B Yarmus Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-12
Authors: Pietro Nardelli; Alexander Jaeger; Conor O'Shea; Kashif A Khan; Marcus P Kennedy; Pádraig Cantillon-Murphy Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Mohammed Al-Jaghbeer; Mathew Marcus; Martin Durkin; Franklin R McGuire; Imran H Iftikhar Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 4.031
Authors: Brian S Furukawa; Nicholas J Pastis; Nichole T Tanner; Alexander Chen; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Ala-Eddin S Sagar; Bruce F Sabath; George A Eapen; Juhee Song; Mathieu Marcoux; Mona Sarkiss; Muhammad H Arain; Horiana B Grosu; David E Ost; Carlos A Jimenez; Roberto F Casal Journal: Chest Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Lonny Yarmus; Jason Akulian; Momen Wahidi; Alex Chen; Jennifer P Steltz; Sam L Solomon; Diana Yu; Fabien Maldonado; Jose Cardenas-Garcia; Daniela Molena; Hans Lee; Anil Vachani Journal: Chest Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 9.410