Lisa Gfrerer1, Valeriy Shubinets, Tatiana Hoyos, Yawei Kong, Christina Nguyen, Peter Pietschmann, Cynthia C Morton, Richard L Maas, Eric C Liao. 1. Boston and Cambridge, Mass.; and Vienna, Austria From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; the Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna; the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, and Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and the Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oblique facial clefts, also known as Tessier clefts, are severe orofacial clefts, the genetic basis of which is poorly understood. Human genetics studies revealed that disruption in SPECC1L resulted in oblique facial clefts, demonstrating that oblique facial cleft malformation has a genetic basis. An important step toward innovation in treatment of oblique facial clefts would be improved understanding of its genetic pathogenesis. The authors exploit the zebrafish model to elucidate the function of SPECC1L by studying its homolog, specc1lb. METHODS: Gene and protein expression analysis was carried out by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry staining. Morpholino knockdown, mRNA rescue, lineage tracing and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling assays were performed for functional analysis. RESULTS: Expression of specc1lb was detected in epithelia juxtaposed to chondrocytes. Knockdown of specc1lb resulted in bilateral clefts between median and lateral elements of the ethmoid plate, structures analogous to the frontonasal process and the paired maxillary processes. Lineage tracing analysis revealed that cranial neural crest cells contributing to the frontonasal prominence failed to integrate with the maxillary prominence populations. Cells contributing to lower jaw structures were able to migrate to their destined pharyngeal segment but failed to converge to form mandibular elements. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that specc1lb is required for integration of frontonasal and maxillary elements and convergence of mandibular prominences. The authors confirm the role of SPECC1L in orofacial cleft pathogenesis in the first animal model of Tessier cleft, providing morphogenetic insight into the mechanisms of normal craniofacial development and oblique facial cleft pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND:Oblique facial clefts, also known as Tessier clefts, are severe orofacial clefts, the genetic basis of which is poorly understood. Human genetics studies revealed that disruption in SPECC1L resulted in oblique facial clefts, demonstrating that oblique facial cleft malformation has a genetic basis. An important step toward innovation in treatment of oblique facial clefts would be improved understanding of its genetic pathogenesis. The authors exploit the zebrafish model to elucidate the function of SPECC1L by studying its homolog, specc1lb. METHODS: Gene and protein expression analysis was carried out by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry staining. Morpholino knockdown, mRNA rescue, lineage tracing and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling assays were performed for functional analysis. RESULTS: Expression of specc1lb was detected in epithelia juxtaposed to chondrocytes. Knockdown of specc1lb resulted in bilateral clefts between median and lateral elements of the ethmoid plate, structures analogous to the frontonasal process and the paired maxillary processes. Lineage tracing analysis revealed that cranial neural crest cells contributing to the frontonasal prominence failed to integrate with the maxillary prominence populations. Cells contributing to lower jaw structures were able to migrate to their destined pharyngeal segment but failed to converge to form mandibular elements. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that specc1lb is required for integration of frontonasal and maxillary elements and convergence of mandibular prominences. The authors confirm the role of SPECC1L in orofacial cleft pathogenesis in the first animal model of Tessier cleft, providing morphogenetic insight into the mechanisms of normal craniofacial development and oblique facial cleft pathogenesis.
Authors: Sarah L Versnel; Marijke E P van den Elzen; Eppo B Wolvius; Charlotte S Biesmeijer; J Michiel Vaandrager; Jacques C van der Meulen; Irene M J Mathijssen Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Elisabetta Ferretti; Bingsi Li; Rediet Zewdu; Victoria Wells; Jean M Hebert; Courtney Karner; Matthew J Anderson; Trevor Williams; Jill Dixon; Michael J Dixon; Michael J Depew; Licia Selleri Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Naoyuki Wada; Yashar Javidan; Sarah Nelson; Thomas J Carney; Robert N Kelsh; Thomas F Schilling Journal: Development Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Shinji Kondo; Brian C Schutte; Rebecca J Richardson; Bryan C Bjork; Alexandra S Knight; Yoriko Watanabe; Emma Howard; Renata L L Ferreira de Lima; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Achim Sander; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Elaine H Zackai; Edward J Lammer; Arthur S Aylsworth; Holly H Ardinger; Andrew C Lidral; Barbara R Pober; Lina Moreno; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Consuelo Valencia; Claude Houdayer; Michel Bahuau; Danilo Moretti-Ferreira; Antonio Richieri-Costa; Michael J Dixon; Jeffrey C Murray Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2002-09-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Elizabeth J Leslie; Jennifer L Mancuso; Brian C Schutte; Margaret E Cooper; Kate M Durda; Jamie L'Heureux; Theresa M Zucchero; Mary L Marazita; Jeffrey C Murray Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Brendan C Dickson; David Swanson; George S Charames; Christopher Dm Fletcher; Jason L Hornick Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Paul Kruszka; Dong Li; Margaret H Harr; Nathan R Wilson; Daniel Swarr; Elizabeth M McCormick; Rosetta M Chiavacci; Mindy Li; Ariel F Martinez; Rachel A Hart; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Matthew A Deardorff; Marni J Falk; Judith E Allanson; Cindy Hudson; John P Johnson; Irfan Saadi; Hakon Hakonarson; Maximilian Muenke; Elaine H Zackai Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Hye-Jung E Chun; Emilia L Lim; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Saeed Saberi; Karen L Mungall; Mikhail Bilenky; Annaick Carles; Kane Tse; Inna Shlafman; Kelsey Zhu; Jenny Q Qian; Diana L Palmquist; An He; William Long; Rodrigo Goya; Michelle Ng; Veronique G LeBlanc; Erin Pleasance; Nina Thiessen; Tina Wong; Eric Chuah; Yong-Jun Zhao; Jacquie E Schein; Daniela S Gerhard; Michael D Taylor; Andrew J Mungall; Richard A Moore; Yussanne Ma; Steven J M Jones; Elizabeth J Perlman; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Nathan R Wilson; Adam J Olm-Shipman; Diana S Acevedo; Kanagaraj Palaniyandi; Everett G Hall; Edina Kosa; Kelly M Stumpff; Guerin J Smith; Lenore Pitstick; Eric C Liao; Bryan C Bjork; Andras Czirok; Irfan Saadi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: James F Brinkley; Shannon Fisher; Matthew P Harris; Greg Holmes; Joan E Hooper; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Kenneth L Jones; Carl Kesselman; Ophir D Klein; Richard L Maas; Mary L Marazita; Licia Selleri; Richard A Spritz; Harm van Bakel; Axel Visel; Trevor J Williams; Joanna Wysocka; Yang Chai Journal: Development Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 6.868