| Literature DB >> 25356548 |
Juan-Juan Xin1, Qing-Li Shang2, Nicolas Desneux3, Xi-Wu Gao1.
Abstract
Sitobion avenae is a major agricultural pest of wheat in China. Using microsatellite markers, we studied the potential gene flow, genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of seven S. avenae populations from different regions of China (Beijing, Hebei, Henan, Hubei, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Shanxi provinces). The populations from Henan, Shandong, and Jiangsu showed high levels of genic and genotypic diversity. By contrast, the genic diversity in the Beijing and Hebei populations was much lower. Despite this low genic diversity, the genotypic diversity of the Beijing population was higher than that of all of the other populations, except those from Jiangsu and Shandong. Overall, the genetic divergence among the seven S. avenae populations tested was high, though there was almost no differentiation between the Shandong and Henan populations. We observed significant negative correlation between the strength of gene flow and the geographic distances among populations. Based on genetic analysis, the seven S. avenae populations studied can be divided into four distinct clusters; (i) Hubei, (ii) Shanxi, (iii) Beijing and Hebei, and (iv) Shandong, Henan, and Jiangsu. The present results provide a basis for potentially optimizing integrated pest management (IPM) programs in China, through adapting control methods that target biological traits shared by various populations of the same genotype.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25356548 PMCID: PMC4214629 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1S. avenae sampling sites in China.
Outcomes of null allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium test, and HWE test.
| Populations | Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong | Shanxi |
| Null allele frequency ( | |||||||
| Sm10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sm11 | — | — | — | 0.06 | — | 0.07 | — |
| Sm12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sm17 | 0.08 | — | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | — | — |
| Sa∑4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Linkage disequilibrium test ( | |||||||
| Sm10-Sm11 | 0.51 | 0.01* | 0.03* | 0.75 | 0.34 | 0.64 | 0.04* |
| Sm10-Sm12 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00* | 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.12 |
| Sm11-Sm12 | 1.00 | 0.00* | 0.01* | 0.19 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Sm11-Sm17 | NA | 0.01* | 0.25 | 0.00* | 0.94 | 0.00* | 1.00 |
| Sm12-Sa∑4 | 0.46 | 0.06 | NA | NA | 0.03* | NA | 1.00 |
| Sm10-Sm17 | 0.28 | 0.02* | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.77 | 0.06 |
| Sm10-Sa∑4 | 0.24 | 0.76 | NA | NA | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| Sm11-Sa∑4 | 1.00 | 0.26 | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.46 | 1.00 |
| Sm12-Sm17 | 0.21 | 0.02* | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
| Sm17-Sa∑4 | NA | 0.39 | NA | NA | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.17 |
| HWE test ( | |||||||
| heterozygote deficit | 0.58 | 0.00a | 0.01a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 1.00 |
| heterozygote excess | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00a |
“—”: There were no null alleles detected.
“*”: p<0.05, significant linkage; “NA”: no contingency table.
: P<0.05, significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Indices of genetic diversity for the seven S. avenae populations of China sampled in 2012.
| Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong | Shanxi | |
|
| 40 | 35 | 36 | 32 | 36 | 31 | 36 |
|
| 0.390 | 0.530 | 0.487 | 0.741 | 0.637 | 0.728 | 0.546 |
|
| 6.0 | 7.6 | 6.8 | 15.2 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 7.2 |
|
| 3.65 | 4.35 | 3.69 | 8.36 | 6.11 | 7.15 | 4.10 |
|
| −0.075 | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.079 | 0.003 | 0.122 | −0.413 |
|
| 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.77 |
|
| 0.39 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
| MLG | 37 | 31 | 25 | 29 | 36 | 31 | 26 |
|
| 0.925 | 0.886 | 0.694 | 0.906 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.722 |
| within | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| among | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
H, observed heterozygosity; H, expected heterozygosity; H, gene diversity; N, mean numbers of alleles; Ar, allelic richness based on eight samples per population; MLGs, number of multilocus genotypes; #within, number of MLGs shared within a population; #among, number of MLGs shared among populations; K, index of global genotypic diversity (MLGs /N); F, the inbreeding index. The seven populations were named by their sampling locations, Beijing, Hubei, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Shanxi, respectively.
Pairwise F value among the seven S. avenae populations of China.
| Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong | |
| Hubei | 0.4186 | |||||
| Hebei | 0.1055 | 0.3626 | ||||
| Henan | 0.2604 | 0.2137 | 0.2015 | |||
| Jiangsu | 0.3547 | 0.3182 | 0.2852 | 0.1611 | ||
| Shandong | 0.2589 | 0.2253 | 0.1911 | 0.0383 | 0.1012 | |
| Shanxi | 0.3836 | 0.3320 | 0.2648 | 0.1654 | 0.2724 | 0.1858 |
F≤0.05, indicates little differentiation among populations; 0.05
The composition of variation (average over 5 loci).
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance components (Vi) | Percentage variation | Fixation Indices |
| Among population | 176.279 | 0.49323Va | 25.47 |
|
| Among individuals within populations | 272.715 | −0.09396Vb | −4.85 |
|
| Within individuals | 319.500 | 1.53724Vc | 79.38 |
|
| Total | 768.494 | 1.93651 |
Va, the variance among populations; Vb, the variance whin population; Vc: the variance within individuals. F, the average of genetic differentiation among populations; F, the average of inbreeding coefficient among individuals within populations; F, the average of total inbreeding coefficient.
Summary of the F-statistics at five microsatellite loci.
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sm10 | 0.012 | −0.086 | 0.090 | 2.528 |
| Sm11 | 0.502 | 0.082 | 0.457 | 0.297 |
| Sm12 | 0.033 | −0.183 | 0.182 | 1.124 |
| Sm17 | 0.282 | 0.021 | 0.267 | 0.686 |
| Sa∑4 | 0.126 | 0.038 | 0.092 | 2.467 |
| Mean | 0.191 | −0.026 | 0.218 | 0.899 |
F: the average of total inbreeding coefficient; F: the average of inbreeding coefficient among populations; F: the average of genetic differentiation; N: gene flow, .
The number of individuals that migrated among differential regions.
| Nm | Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong |
| Hubei | 0.3472 | |||||
| Hebei | 2.1197 | 0.4395 | ||||
| Henan | 0.7101 | 0.9199 | 0.9907 | |||
| Jiangsu | 0.4548 | 0.5357 | 0.6266 | 1.3018 | ||
| Shandong | 0.7156 | 0.8596 | 1.0582 | 6.2774 | 2.2204 | |
| Shanxi | 0.4017 | 0.5030 | 0.6941 | 1.2615 | 0.6678 | 1.0955 |
N, gene flow, .
Figure 2UPMGA Phylogenetic tree of seven different S. avenae geographic populations in China.
Figure 3Three-dimensional factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) of S. avenae sampled in 2012.
The circles indicate populations that cluster according to geography.
The standard genetic distance (D) and Nei's unbiased genetic distance (D) of pairwise comparisons among the seven populations.
| Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong | Shanxi | |
| Beijing | — | 1.0144 | 0.0890 | 0.5421 | 0.9047 | 0.5294 | 0.8219 |
| Hubei | 0.7344 | — | 0.8859 | 0.5784 | 1.0331 | 0.6196 | 0.8590 |
| Hebei | 0.1914 | 0.6757 | — | 0.4638 | 0.7195 | 0.4123 | 0.4870 |
| Henan | 0.5674 | 0.7286 | 0.5835 | — | 0.5557 | 0.1233 | 0.3740 |
| Jiangsu | 0.5864 | 0.7111 | 0.5447 | 0.5470 | — | 0.2811 | 0.7536 |
| Shandong | 0.5050 | 0.7147 | 0.4976 | 0.3532 | 0.3294 | — | 0.4354 |
| Shanxi | 0.5382 | 0.6810 | 0.3746 | 0.5354 | 0.5196 | 0.5318 | — |
“upper triangle”, Nei's standard genetic distance (D); “lower triangle”: Nei's genetic distance (D). The seven populations were named by their sampled locations, Beijing, Hubei, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Shanxi, respectively.
Analysis of molecular variances (AMOVA) of microsatellites in the seven populations.
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage variation | Fixation Indices |
| Among groups | 142.425 | 0.36698 | 18.33888 |
|
| Among populations within groups | 33.855 | 0.19082 | 9.53602 |
|
| Among individuals within population | 272.715 | −0.09396 | −4.69544 |
|
| Within individuals | 319.5 | 1.53724 | 76.82053 |
|
| Total | 768.494 | 2.00108 |
Va, variance components among groups; Vb, variance components among populations but within groups; Vc, variance components among individuals within population; Vd, variance components within individuals; F, F SC, F, and F are inbreeding coefficients.