Literature DB >> 25356392

Mutant BRAF in low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors and focal cortical dysplasia.

Gianluca Marucci1, Dario de Biase2, Michela Visani3, Marco Giulioni4, Matteo Martinoni4, Llilia Volpi5, Patrizia Riguzzi5, Guido Rubboli6, Roberto Michelucci5, Giovanni Tallini2.   

Abstract

BRAF alterations, namely BRAF fusion and BRAF V600E mutation, have been recently reported in low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors. Twenty low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors were retrieved to evaluate the BRAF mutational status. BRAF mutations were present in 10 tumors and concomitantly in associated dysplastic tissue of three patients. We here show for the first time that BRAF mutations are present not only in low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors but, in some cases, also in the associated focal cortical dysplasia.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25356392      PMCID: PMC4212486          DOI: 10.1002/acn3.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol        ISSN: 2328-9503            Impact factor:   4.511


Introduction

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEAT) represent a common pathologic substrate in the setting of medically intractable chronic epilepsy.1 These tumors most commonly arise in the temporal lobe, mainly in the temporo-anterior-basal-mesial site.2 A significant part of these neoplasms, particularly ganglioglioma (GG) and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), is associated with malformations of cortical development, in particular focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) (30–80% of cases).3–5 Moreover, a case of GG associated with FCD type IIa has been recently reported, where findings suggest the dynamic-evolutive-oncogenic potential of cells comprising FCD type IIa.6 A possible common origin of GG and FCD, from a precursor that undergoes abnormal glioneuronal development has been proposed.7 LEAT share the expression of CD348: CD34-immunoreactive cells could represent dysplastic or undifferentiated neural precursors.7 Furthermore, BRAF alterations, namely BRAF fusion9 and BRAF V600E mutation,8,10 have been recorded in LEAT. Interestingly, it has been recently observed that mutant BRAF protein in GG is predominantly expressed by neuronal tumor cells.11 As a member of the RAF family of serine/threonine kinases, BRAF is a key mediator of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway (also known as the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway). BRAF is involved in a wide variety of cellular functions, including cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, terminal differentiation, and apoptosis.12 The BRAF gene is activated by oncogenic mutations. Most BRAF mutations are missense mutations at amino acid position 600, resulting in an exchange of valine for glutamate (referred to as BRAFV600E). A small-molecule inhibitor with antineoplastic activity (vemurafenib) that targets BRAF V600E mutant has been recently developed.13 We here show for the first time that BRAF mutations are present not only in LEAT but, in a significant proportion of cases, also in the FCD tissue associated with LEAT.

Methods

Twenty LEATs referred to the Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy, were retrieved (Male/Female ratio 8/12) to evaluate the BRAF mutational status. Epilepsy onset mean age was 12 years (range 1 months to 51 years), mean age at surgery was 22.5 years (range 3–51 years), and mean duration of epilepsy was 5 years (range 6 months to 38 years). Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range 1–11 years). All patients were submitted to a pre-surgical neurophysiological assessment by means of noninvasive long-term video-EEG monitoring aimed to define the epileptogenic area. Seizure semiology, obtained by clinical history and ictal video-EEG monitoring were consistent with focal temporal lobe seizures in all patients. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging was performed. All the patients were submitted to a tailored surgery, consisting in removing the tumor, the temporal pole, the anterior neocortical lateral cortex, the uncus–entorhinal area, and the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus. LEATs were histologically classified according to the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system.14 Namely the study included eight GG (40%), two gangliocytomas (GC) (10%), four DNT (20%), four pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXA) (20%), one papillary glioneuronal tumor (5%), and one grade II diffuse astrocytoma (5%). Furthermore, all the specimens were also histologically classified according to the published criteria for mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) diagnosis15 and the most updated classification of FCD,16 which has been shown to considerably improve the reproducibility of FCD diagnoses.17 In 10 cases (50%), the tumors were associated with FCD (associated cases), while in 10 cases (50%) FCD was not present (isolated tumoral cases). The areas identified as dysplastic were carefully evaluated with CD34, MAP2, p53, Ki67, and IDH1 antisera, in order to rule out the possibility of tumor infiltration misdiagnosed as dysplastic tissue. Specifically, the group of cases with FCD showed an architectural cortical dysplasia, without dysmorphic neurons or ballon cells (FCD type IIIb), in 4/10 cases (40%). The remaining 6/10 (60%) patients had FCD type IIa. No patient presented concomitant MTS. BRAF mutational status was separately analyzed in all 20 LEATS, in the 10 tumor-associated FCD specimens and in the 10 histologically normal cortical tissue samples adjacent to the LEATS that were not associated with FCD. For comparison 10 samples of “isolated FCD” (five of FCD type I, four of FCD type IIa and one of FCD type IIb) have also been tested for BRAF mutational status. In order to assess the BRAF molecular status DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material scraped under microscope guidance from five 10-μm thick sections, using the MasterPure DNA FFPE extraction kit (Roche Diagnostic, Manheim, Germany). About 10 ng of DNA were used for amplification with primers specific for BRAF exon 15 (Fw 5′ – TGCTTGCTCTGATAGGAAAATGA – 3′; Rv 5′ – TGGATCCAGACAACTGTTCAAA – 3′) modified with universal tail sequences and multiple identifier (MID) nucleotides. Sequencing was performed using the 454 GS-Junior next generation sequencer (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany) according to established protocols (http://www.454.com/). Results were analyzed using Amplicon Variant Analyzer (AVA) software (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany). Next generation sequencing of target DNA sequences (reads) not only allows to identify a mutation but also gives the percentage of mutated amplicons in the sample analyzed.

Results

Histopathological and molecular results of LEATs and of associated FCD are summarized in Table1. Findings observed in isolated LEATs (without FCD) and in adjacent histologically normal cortex are summarized in Table2. At least 519 consensual reads (analyzed sequences) were obtained with parallel sequencing (median number 922 reads, range 519–1352 reads). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in eight neoplastic specimens. One GG sample had the BRAF V600K mutation. One DNT sample had a mutation resulting in the insertion of a threonine residue between codons 599 and 600 (BRAF T599_V600 InsT). Altogether BRAF mutations were found in three out of four PXA (75%), in four out of eight GG (50%) (including the case with the BRAF V600K mutation), in two out of four DNT (50%) (including the BRAF T599_V600insT mutation), and in the single case of grade II diffuse astrocytoma. The remaining 10 LEATs were not mutated for BRAF. Three dysplastic specimens, constituted by FCD type IIa, had the BRAF V600E mutation: all these three cases were associated with a BRAF V600E mutated tumor (one GG and two PXA) (see Fig.1A and B). On the other hand, seven dysplastic cases (four FCD type IIIb and three FCD type IIa), the 10 tumor-associated brain samples without cortical dysplasia and the 10 cases of “isolated FCD” were not mutated for BRAF.
Table 1

Histological and molecular results of LEATs with associated FCD.

CaseHistological diagnosisBRAF status% of mutated readsTotal number of reads
1GGV600E2.5571
FCD type IIIbWT
2GGV600E121091
FCD type IIaV600E5559
3DNTT599_V600InsT21047
FCD type IIIbWT
4GGV600E3.81109
FCD type IIaWT
5GGWT
FCD type IIaWT
6DNTWT
FCD type IIIbWT
7GGWT
FCD type IIaWT
8PXAWT
FCD type IIIbWT
9PXAV600E33940
FCD type IIaV600E5903
10PXAV600E25967
FCD type IIaV600E3.5820

DNT, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; GG, ganglioglioma; PXA, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma; WT, wild type.

Table 2

Histological and molecular results of isolated LEATs (without FCD) and of adjacent histologically normal cortex.

CaseHistological diagnosisBRAF status% of mutated readsTotal number of reads
11DNTV600E16.6883
NO FCDWT
12DNTWT
NO FCDWT
13PGNTWT
NO FCDWT
14GangliocytomaWT
NO FCDWT
15PXAV600E17.5519
NO FCDWT
16Grade II diffuse astrocytomaV600E311352
NO FCDWT
17GGWT
NO FCDWT
18GGV600K26630
NO FCDWT
19GangliocytomaWT
NO FCDWT
20GGWT
NO FCDWT

DNT, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; GG, ganglioglioma; PGNT, papillary glioneuronal tumor; PXA, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma; WT, wild type.

Figure 1

Case no. 9. (A) Representative BRAFV600E mutated LEAT: the tumor is a grade II pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma composed of giant neoplastic cells showing nuclear pleomorphism and xanthomatous changes; nuclear inclusions and numerous eosinophilic granular bodies are present; in spite of marked cytological pleomorphism the tumor lacks microvascular proliferation and necrosis; mitotic figures are not common (H&E, 200× magnification); (B) corresponding BRAFV600E mutated associated FCD: dysmorphic neurons in focal cortical displasia type IIa (H&E, 200× magnification).

Histological and molecular results of LEATs with associated FCD. DNT, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; GG, ganglioglioma; PXA, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma; WT, wild type. Histological and molecular results of isolated LEATs (without FCD) and of adjacent histologically normal cortex. DNT, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; GG, ganglioglioma; PGNT, papillary glioneuronal tumor; PXA, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma; WT, wild type. Case no. 9. (A) Representative BRAFV600E mutated LEAT: the tumor is a grade II pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma composed of giant neoplastic cells showing nuclear pleomorphism and xanthomatous changes; nuclear inclusions and numerous eosinophilic granular bodies are present; in spite of marked cytological pleomorphism the tumor lacks microvascular proliferation and necrosis; mitotic figures are not common (H&E, 200× magnification); (B) corresponding BRAFV600E mutated associated FCD: dysmorphic neurons in focal cortical displasia type IIa (H&E, 200× magnification).

Discussion

We here show for the first time that BRAF mutations are present not only in LEATs, as recently shown8,10 but also in the FCD that accompanies LEAT. These data are very intriguing, as a possible common origin of LEATs and FCD from a precursor that undergoes abnormal glioneuronal development, has been postulated7 but not yet proven. Lesional cells may represent a low proportion of FCD tissue requiring a highly sensitive method to identify genetic alterations. Next generation sequencing targeted to BRAF exon 15 was utilized for mutation detection. In the FCD type IIa cases where we identified BRAF mutations, the diagnostic clue was represented by the presence of dysmorphic neurons. This observation is in line with the recent finding that the mutant BRAFV600E protein in GG is predominantly expressed by neuronal tumor cells.11 We considered the possibility that identification of BRAFV600E mutated alleles in FCD samples simply reflected the presence of rare neoplastic cells interspersed with the dysplastic elements. However, this possibility has been excluded by the careful histologic and immunohistochemical screening (with CD34, MAP2, p53, Ki67 and IDH1 antisera) of all FCD cases prior to molecular analysis. Importantly, the percentage of mutated target sequences (reads) in the BRAFV600E mutated FCD samples was 5% in two cases and 3.5% in the remaining case. Assuming that the BRAFV600E is heterozygous the amount of mutated cells in the sample analyzed was 7–10%, a proportion of possible neoplastic cells well above the threshold for histopathological diagnosis. We did not find BRAF mutations in the cases of “isolated FCD,” unlike “associated FCD.” This difference could reflect a not common biological pathway. It is well known for example that isolated FCD type I represents a different disease, with different outcome, in comparison to FCD type I associated with another lesion (i.e., hippocampal sclerosis, tumor, vascular malformation), so that today it is diagnosed as FCD type III. Finally, the recent finding that expression of BRAF V600E is associated with a worse postoperative seizure outcome in glioneuronal tumors18 could be explained by the presence, in some cases, of a not removed FCD in the adjacent cortex. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that – in a significant proportion of cases – FCD and LEATs can show an evolutive oncogenic progression, similar to what has already been shown for other tumors.19 Interestingly, we found the BRAF V600E mutation also in a grade II diffuse astrocytoma, a tumor included in LEATs, but not having a glioneuronal nature. This finding, only rarely documented in large systematic studies,10,20 is consistent with a recent report21 in which the BRAF V600E mutation was identified in five (15%) out of 33 consecutive grade 2 diffuse gliomas. The authors observed that four out of these five BRAF-mutant grade 2 diffuse gliomas presented with long-standing, frequent, sometimes refractory seizures and all four tumors were located within the temporal lobe. They also reported two cases of glioblastoma with BRAF V600E, both in patients presenting with focal seizures. All these data indicate that BRAF mutations occur in a setting specifically linked to epileptogenesis. To the best of our knowledge this is the first demonstration that BRAF mutations are present in the FCD associated with LEAT, suggesting a pathogenetic role. Our findings prompt further investigation into the potential role of BRAF mutations in cyto-architectural dysplasia and in the tumorigenesis of LEATs.

Author Contributions

G. M. designed the study, discussed and interpreted results, wrote the manuscript. D. d. B. performed molecular experiments, analyzed, and interpreted results. M. V. performed molecular experiments. M. G. performed tailored surgery, discussed results. M. M. performed tailored surgery. L. V. performed pre-surgical neurological assessment. P. R. contributed to pre-surgical neurological assessment. G. R. performed pre-surgical neurological assessment. R. M. discussed and interpreted results, supervised the work. G. T. discussed and interpreted results, coordinated, and supervised the work.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.
  20 in total

1.  Expression of CD34 as a novel marker for glioneuronal lesions associated with chronic intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  P Deb; M C Sharma; M Tripathi; P Sarat Chandra; A Gupta; C Sarkar
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.090

2.  BRAF V600E mutation identifies a subset of low-grade diffusely infiltrating gliomas in adults.

Authors:  Andrew S Chi; Tracy T Batchelor; Daniel Yang; Dora Dias-Santagata; Darrell R Borger; Leif W Ellisen; A John Iafrate; David N Louis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Frequent association of cortical dysplasia in dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor treated by epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Akio Takahashi; Seung-Chyul Hong; Dae Won Seo; Seung Bong Hong; Munhyang Lee; Yeon-Lim Suh
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-11

4.  BRAF alterations in primary glial and glioneuronal neoplasms of the central nervous system with identification of 2 novel KIAA1549:BRAF fusion variants.

Authors:  Alex Lin; Fausto J Rodriguez; Matthias A Karajannis; Susan C Williams; Genevieve Legault; David Zagzag; Peter C Burger; Jeffrey C Allen; Charles G Eberhart; Eli E Bar
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.685

5.  The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: a consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission.

Authors:  Ingmar Blümcke; Maria Thom; Eleonora Aronica; Dawna D Armstrong; Harry V Vinters; Andre Palmini; Thomas S Jacques; Giuliano Avanzini; A James Barkovich; Giorgio Battaglia; Albert Becker; Carlos Cepeda; Fernando Cendes; Nadia Colombo; Peter Crino; J Helen Cross; Olivier Delalande; François Dubeau; John Duncan; Renzo Guerrini; Philippe Kahane; Gary Mathern; Imad Najm; Ciğdem Ozkara; Charles Raybaud; Alfonso Represa; Steven N Roper; Noriko Salamon; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Laura Tassi; Annamaria Vezzani; Roberto Spreafico
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  Cortical architectural abnormalities and MIB1 immunoreactivity in gangliogliomas: a study of 60 patients with intracranial tumors.

Authors:  R A Prayson; K Khajavi; Y G Comair
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.685

7.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors share with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and gangliogliomas BRAF(V600E) mutation and expression.

Authors:  Céline Chappé; Laetitia Padovani; Didier Scavarda; Fabien Forest; Isabelle Nanni-Metellus; Anderson Loundou; Sandy Mercurio; Frédéric Fina; Gabriel Lena; Carole Colin; Dominique Figarella-Branger
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.508

8.  Seizure outcome of epilepsy surgery in focal epilepsies associated with temporomesial glioneuronal tumors: lesionectomy compared with tailored resection.

Authors:  Marco Giulioni; Guido Rubboli; Gianluca Marucci; Matteo Martinoni; Lilia Volpi; Roberto Michelucci; Anna Federica Marliani; Francesca Bisulli; Paolo Tinuper; Laura Castana; Ivana Sartori; Fabio Calbucci
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Ganglioglioma arising from dysplastic cortex.

Authors:  Xilma R Ortiz-González; Sriram Venneti; Jaclyn A Biegel; Lucy B Rorke-Adams; Brenda E Porter
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 6.740

10.  A new clinico-pathological classification system for mesial temporal sclerosis.

Authors:  Ingmar Blümcke; Elisabeth Pauli; Hans Clusmann; Johannes Schramm; Albert Becker; Christian Elger; Martin Merschhemke; Heinz-Joachim Meencke; Thomas Lehmann; Andreas von Deimling; Christian Scheiwe; Josef Zentner; Benedikt Volk; Johann Romstöck; Hermann Stefan; Michelle Hildebrandt
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  10 in total

1.  Targeted BRAF and CTNNB1 next-generation sequencing allows proper classification of nonadenomatous lesions of the sellar region in samples with limiting amounts of lesional cells.

Authors:  Gianluca Marucci; Dario de Biase; Matteo Zoli; Marco Faustini-Fustini; Antonella Bacci; Ernesto Pasquini; Michela Visani; Diego Mazzatenta; Giorgio Frank; Giovanni Tallini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Observations on epilepsy associated with low-grade tumors and focal cortical dysplasias.

Authors:  Marco Giulioni; Matteo Martinoni; Gianluca Marucci
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Germline and somatic FGFR1 abnormalities in dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors.

Authors:  Barbara Rivera; Tenzin Gayden; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Javad Nadaf; Talia Boshari; Damien Faury; Michele Zeinieh; Romeo Blanc; David L Burk; Somayyeh Fahiminiya; Eric Bareke; Ulrich Schüller; Camelia M Monoranu; Ronald Sträter; Kornelius Kerl; Thomas Niederstadt; Gerhard Kurlemann; Benjamin Ellezam; Zuzanna Michalak; Maria Thom; Paul J Lockhart; Richard J Leventer; Milou Ohm; Duncan MacGregor; David Jones; Jason Karamchandani; Celia M T Greenwood; Albert M Berghuis; Susanne Bens; Reiner Siebert; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Pawel P Liberski; Krzysztof Zakrzewski; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Werner Paulus; Steffen Albrecht; Martin Hasselblatt; Nada Jabado; William D Foulkes; Jacek Majewski
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 17.088

4.  Challenges in epilepsy-associated tumors.

Authors:  Marco Giulioni; Matteo Martinoni; Gianluca Marucci
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  BRAFV600E expression in neural progenitors results in a hyperexcitable phenotype in neocortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Roman U Goz; Gülcan Akgül; Joseph J LoTurco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  What is New in the Management of Epilepsy in Gliomas?

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Linking brain tumors and epileptic seizures.

Authors:  Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Martin McMahon
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  The Frequency of Focal Cortical Dysplasia-Like Histologic Features Near Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas.

Authors:  Mireille Bitar; Yevgen Chornenkyy; Margaret E Flanagan; Alicia Steffens; Kathleen McCortney; Craig Horbinski
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  The use of technical replication for detection of low-level somatic mutations in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Junho Kim; Dachan Kim; Jae Seok Lim; Ju Heon Maeng; Hyeonju Son; Hoon-Chul Kang; Hojung Nam; Jeong Ho Lee; Sangwoo Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Epilepsy and BRAF Mutations: Phenotypes, Natural History and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.

Authors:  Domenica I Battaglia; Maria Luigia Gambardella; Stefania Veltri; Ilaria Contaldo; Giovanni Chillemi; Chiara Veredice; Michela Quintiliani; Chiara Leoni; Roberta Onesimo; Tommaso Verdolotti; Francesca Clementina Radio; Diego Martinelli; Marina Trivisano; Nicola Specchio; Charlotte Dravet; Marco Tartaglia; Giuseppe Zampino
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.