Literature DB >> 25356320

Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in human and non-toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae in cat.

L Detemmerman1, D Rousseaux2, A Efstratiou3, C Schirvel4, K Emmerechts1, I Wybo1, O Soetens1, D Piérard1.   

Abstract

Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans are rarely isolated from clinical samples in Belgium. A case of toxigenic C. ulcerans in a woman is described, which confirms that this pathogen is still present. During investigation of the patient's cats, only a non-toxigenic toxin-bearing C. diphtheriae strain was detected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cat; Corynebacterium diphtheriae; Corynebacterium ulcerans; diphtheria; human

Year:  2013        PMID: 25356320      PMCID: PMC4184488          DOI: 10.1002/2052-2975.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Case Report

In May 2012, a 72-year-old woman presented with a chronic leg ulceration from which Corynebacterium ulcerans was isolated in mixed culture with Enterobacter aerogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. No systemic symptoms were recorded. A booster with Tedivax pro adulto® was documented in 2007. She had no history of recent travel but was living in a trailer in poor hygienic conditions, with several cats. The condition of the patient improved quickly with oral amoxicillin. The identification was confirmed as C. ulcerans by the National Reference Centre for Corynebacterium diphtheriae. The toxin gene was detected by conventional PCR [1]. A 900-base-pair (bp) PCR fragment of the toxin gene of C. ulcerans showed 100% identity with AB610405 and FJ858272 toxin gene sequences of C. ulcerans strains and 97% or less similarity with sequences from C. diphtheriae strains. As PCR is not an indicator of toxin expression, the strain was sent to the WHO Global Collaborating Centre for Diphtheria (Public Health England, London) for confirmation of toxigenicity by the Elek immunoprecipitation test. All cultures from close contacts were negative. As C. ulcerans, a zoonotic pathogen [2-4], could be transmitted from animals, an attempt was made to screen the patient's four cats but only two could be captured. Corynebacterium diphtheriae biovar mitis was cultured from one. The toxin gene was detected but Elek testing was negative. Sequencing the complete toxin gene showed 99% sequence similarity to other C. diphtheriae toxin gene sequences but a 1-bp deletion at position 55 resulted in a prematurely terminated peptide at amino acid 38. Multi-locus sequence typing [5] of this strain resulted in ST40 (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the isolates

StrainSourceIdentificationToxin PCR resultElek resultToxin gene sequence GenBank ref.Multilocus sequence typing result
DIFT019Human skin lesionCorynebacterium ulcerans++889 base pairsNot available
KF013949
DIFT020Nose swab from catCorynebacterium diphtheriae biovar mitis+1682 base pairsST40
KF013950
Characteristics of the isolates Since the outbreak in eastern Europe in the 1990s, only rare cases of C. diphtheriae have been observed in Europe [6]. The genus Corynebacterium comprises three species with toxigenic potential: C. diphtheriae, C. ulcerans and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Corynebacterium ulcerans has a broad host range and humans and other mammals can be infected [2,4]. Our patient was probably protected by her recent vaccine booster, as she did not present systemic symptoms. Although zoonotic transmission could not be proven here, this remains the most probable source of infection [2,3]. Curiously, a non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strain was isolated from a cat, suggesting that humans might not be the sole reservoir. Such non-toxigenic feline isolates have already been reported [7], all presenting a 1-bp deletion at nucleotide 55 in the toxin gene, in spite of only 95% sequence similarity. This suggests that closely related toxin genes are present in the feline isolates and questions the role of cats as reservoirs for human infections. This case report shows that immunization against diphtheria toxin remains important not only because of the threat of cases imported from other parts of the world but also because of the zoonotic potential of toxigenic C. ulcerans strains in Europe.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Diphtheria in Europe: current problems and new challenges.

Authors:  Katherina Zakikhany; Androulla Efstratiou
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Polymerase chain reaction assay for diagnosis of potentially toxinogenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains: correlation with ADP-ribosylation activity assay.

Authors:  D Hauser; M R Popoff; M Kiredjian; P Boquet; F Bimet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multilocus sequence typing identifies evidence for recombination and two distinct lineages of Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

Authors:  Frances Bolt; Pamela Cassiday; Maria Lucia Tondella; Aruni Dezoysa; Androulla Efstratiou; Andreas Sing; Aleksandra Zasada; Kathryn Bernard; Nicole Guiso; Edgar Badell; Marie-Laure Rosso; Adam Baldwin; Christopher Dowson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rare human skin infection with Corynebacterium ulcerans: transmission by a domestic cat.

Authors:  M A M Corti; G V Bloemberg; S Borelli; H Kutzner; G Eich; L Hoelzle; S Lautenschlager
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 7.455

5.  Novel Corynebacterium diphtheriae in domestic cats.

Authors:  Aron J Hall; Pamela K Cassiday; Kathryn A Bernard; Frances Bolt; Arnold G Steigerwalt; Danae Bixler; Lucia C Pawloski; Anne M Whitney; Masaaki Iwaki; Adam Baldwin; Christopher G Dowson; Takako Komiya; Motohide Takahashi; Hans P Hinrikson; Maria L Tondella
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in woman and cat.

Authors:  Anja Berger; Ingrid Huber; Sophie-Susann Merbecks; Ingrid Ehrhard; Regina Konrad; Stefan Hörmansdorfer; Michael Hogardt; Andreas Sing
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Pigs as source for toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans.

Authors:  Regina Schuhegger; Christoph Schoerner; Julia Dlugaiczyk; Ina Lichtenfeld; Alexander Trouillier; Veronique Zeller-Peronnet; Ulrich Busch; Anja Berger; Rudolf Kugler; Stefan Hörmansdorfer; Andreas Sing
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Corynebacterium diphtheriae in a free-roaming red fox: case report and historical review on diphtheria in animals.

Authors:  Andreas Sing; Regina Konrad; Dominik M Meinel; Norman Mauder; Ingo Schwabe; Reinhard Sting
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Respiratory Illness Caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, and Use of Diphtheria Antitoxin in the United States, 1996-2018.

Authors:  John O Otshudiema; Anna M Acosta; Pamela K Cassiday; Stephen C Hadler; Susan Hariri; Tejpratap S P Tiwari
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  A Belgian Serosurveillance/Seroprevalence Study of Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis Using a Luminex xMAP Technology-Based Pentaplex.

Authors:  Raissa Nadège Caboré; Denis Piérard; Kris Huygen
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-10

4.  Toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae Infection in Cat, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Ronald Tyler; Layda Rincon; Michael R Weigand; Lingzi Xiaoli; Anna M Acosta; Daniel Kurien; Hong Ju; Sonia Lingsweiler; Emilie Yvonne Prot
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 16.126

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.