Qixia Jiang1, Xiaohua Li1, Aiqin Zhang1, Yanxia Guo2, Yahong Liu1, Haiying Liu3, Xiaolong Qu2, Yajun Zhu4, Xiujun Guo5, Li Liu6, Liyan Zhang7, Suping Bo8, Jing Jia9, Yuejuan Chen10, Rui Zhang11, Jiandong Wang12. 1. Wound Care Center of Department of Outpatient, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 2. Nursing School of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 3. Wuxi Second People's Hospital Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. 4. Jingjiang People's Hospital Jingjiang, Jiangsu, China. 5. Nanjing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 6. Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 7. General Hospital of Beijing Armed Police Force Beijing, China. 8. Jiangsu University Affiliated Hospital Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China. 9. Zhenjiang First People's Hospital Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China. 10. Changshu No. 2 People's Hospital Changshu, Jiangsu, China. 11. Guangzhou Armed Police Force Hospital Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 12. Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Present study is designed to evaluate the effects of preventing pressure ulcer in surgical patients with two types of pressure-relieving mattresses. METHODS: 1074 surgical patients from 12 hospitals in China were divided into A group (static air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours, n = 562) and B group (power pressure air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours, n = 512). The patient was subjected to a pressure-relieving mattress and observed from 0-5 days after surgery. Indications include the Braden scores, hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) incidence and stage. RESULTS: The Braden scores between two groups in five days after surgery were no significant (P > 0.05). The incidence of HAPU between two groups in same days also was no significant (1.07% vs. 0.98%, P > 0.05). The incidence of Stage I and stage II pressure ulcers in group A and B were 1.07% (6/562) and 0.98% (5/512), respectively (χ(2) = 0.148, P = 0.882). CONCLUSION: The effects of preventing pressure ulcer in surgical patients with two types of pressure-relieving mattresses are similar, but the protocol by static air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours is benefit when no power.
OBJECTIVE: Present study is designed to evaluate the effects of preventing pressure ulcer in surgical patients with two types of pressure-relieving mattresses. METHODS: 1074 surgical patients from 12 hospitals in China were divided into A group (static air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours, n = 562) and B group (power pressure air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours, n = 512). The patient was subjected to a pressure-relieving mattress and observed from 0-5 days after surgery. Indications include the Braden scores, hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) incidence and stage. RESULTS: The Braden scores between two groups in five days after surgery were no significant (P > 0.05). The incidence of HAPU between two groups in same days also was no significant (1.07% vs. 0.98%, P > 0.05). The incidence of Stage I and stage II pressure ulcers in group A and B were 1.07% (6/562) and 0.98% (5/512), respectively (χ(2) = 0.148, P = 0.882). CONCLUSION: The effects of preventing pressure ulcer in surgical patients with two types of pressure-relieving mattresses are similar, but the protocol by static air mattress with repositioning every 2 hours is benefit when no power.
Entities:
Keywords:
Support surface; hospital-acquired pressure ulcers; prevention; surgical patients
Authors: Erik H de Laat; Peter Pickkers; Lisette Schoonhoven; André L Verbeek; Ton Feuth; Theo van Achterberg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Brecht Serraes; Ann Van Hecke; Hanne Van Tiggelen; Charlotte Anrys; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Charlotte Anrys; Hanne Van Tiggelen; Sofie Verhaeghe; Ann Van Hecke; Dimitri Beeckman Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Brecht Serraes; Martin van Leen; Jos Schols; Ann Van Hecke; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Victoria Ramsden; Elizabeth McInnes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-10