Literature DB >> 25356069

Sparse Clustering with Resampling for Subject Classification in PET Amyloid Imaging Studies.

Wenzhu Bi1, George C Tseng2, Lisa A Weissfeld2, Julie C Price3.   

Abstract

Sparse k-means clustering (Sparse_kM) can exclude uninformative variables and yield reliable parsimonious clustering results, especially for p≫n. In this work, Sparse_kM and data resampling were combined to identify variables of greatest interest and define confidence levels for the clustering. The method was evaluated by statistical simulation and applied to PiB PET amyloid imaging data to identify normal control (NC) subjects with (+) or without (-) evidence of amyloid, i.e., PiB(+/-). SIMULATIONS: A dataset of n=60 observations (3 groups of 20) and p=500 variables was generated for each simulation run; only 50 variables were truly different across groups. The dataset was resampled 20 times, Sparse_kM was applied to each sample and average variable weights were calculated. Probabilities of cluster membership, also called confidence levels, were computed (n=60). Simulations were performed 250 times. The 50 truly different variables were identified by variable weights that were 13-32 times greater than those for the 450 uninformative variables. HUMAN DATA: For the PiB PET dataset, images (ECAT HR+, 10-15 mCi, 90 min) were acquired for 64 cognitively normal subjects (74.1±5.4 yrs). Parametric PiB distribution volume ratio images were generated (Logan method, cerebellum reference) and normalized to the MNI template (SPM8) to produce a dataset of n=64 subjects and p=343,099 voxels/image. The dataset was resampled 10 times and Sparse_kM was applied. An average voxel weight image was computed that indicated cortical areas of greatest interest that included precuneus and frontal cortex; these are key areas linked to early amyloid deposition. Seven of 64 subjects were identified as PiB(+) and 47 as PiB(-) with confidence ≥ 90%, where another subject was PiB(+) at lower confidence (80%) and the other 9 subjects were PiB(-) at confidence in the range of 50-70%. In conclusion, Sparse_kM with resampling can help to establish confidence levels for clustering when p≫n and may be a promising method for revealing informative voxels/spatial patterns that distinguish levels of amyloid load, including that at the transitional amyloid +/- boundary.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 25356069      PMCID: PMC4209405          DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6152564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)        ISSN: 1095-7863


  7 in total

1.  Tight clustering: a resampling-based approach for identifying stable and tight patterns in data.

Authors:  George C Tseng; Wing H Wong
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Simplified parametric methods for [11C]PIB studies.

Authors:  Maqsood Yaqub; Nelleke Tolboom; Ronald Boellaard; Bart N M van Berckel; Erica W van Tilburg; Gert Luurtsema; Philip Scheltens; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Not quite PIB-positive, not quite PIB-negative: slight PIB elevations in elderly normal control subjects are biologically relevant.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Mormino; Michael G Brandel; Cindee M Madison; Gil D Rabinovici; Shawn Marks; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A framework for feature selection in clustering.

Authors:  Daniela M Witten; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 5.  Imaging the pathology of Alzheimer's disease: amyloid-imaging with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  William E Klunk; Henry Engler; Agneta Nordberg; Brian J Bacskai; Yanming Wang; Julie C Price; Mats Bergström; Bradley T Hyman; Bengt Långström; Chester A Mathis
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Synthesis and evaluation of 11C-labeled 6-substituted 2-arylbenzothiazoles as amyloid imaging agents.

Authors:  Chester A Mathis; Yanming Wang; Daniel P Holt; Guo-Feng Huang; Manik L Debnath; William E Klunk
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly.

Authors:  Howard Jay Aizenstein; Robert D Nebes; Judith A Saxton; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; Nicholas D Tsopelas; Scott K Ziolko; Jeffrey A James; Beth E Snitz; Patricia R Houck; Wenzhu Bi; Ann D Cohen; Brian J Lopresti; Steven T DeKosky; Edythe M Halligan; William E Klunk
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-11
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  AV-1451 PET imaging of tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer disease: Defining a summary measure.

Authors:  Shruti Mishra; Brian A Gordon; Yi Su; Jon Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Kelley Jackson; Russ Hornbeck; David A Balota; Nigel J Cairns; John C Morris; Beau M Ances; Tammie L S Benzinger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Ann D Cohen; Wenzhu Mowrey; Lisa A Weissfeld; Howard J Aizenstein; Eric McDade; James M Mountz; Robert D Nebes; Judith A Saxton; Beth Snitz; Steven Dekosky; Jeff Williamson; Oscar L Lopez; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.