Wayne T A Enanoria1, Adam W Crawley2, Jennifer C Hunter2, Jeannie Balido2, Tomas J Aragon3. 1. University of California at Berkeley, School of Public Health, Cal PREPARE Research Center and Division of Epidemiology, Berkeley, CA ; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA. 2. University of California at Berkeley, School of Public Health, Cal PREPARE Research Center and Division of Epidemiology, Berkeley, CA. 3. University of California at Berkeley, School of Public Health, Cal PREPARE Research Center and Division of Epidemiology, Berkeley, CA ; San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Public health surveillance and epidemiologic investigations are critical public health functions for identifying threats to the health of a community. We conducted a survey of local health departments (LHDs) in California to describe the workforce that supports public health surveillance and epidemiologic functions during routine and emergency infectious disease situations. METHODS: The target population consisted of the 61 LHDs in California. The online survey instrument was designed to collect information about the workforce involved in key epidemiologic functions. We also examined how the public health workforce increases its epidemiologic capacity during infectious disease emergencies. RESULTS: Of 61 LHDs in California, 31 (51%) completed the survey. A wide range of job classifications contribute to epidemiologic functions routinely, and LHDs rely on both internal and external sources of epidemiologic surge capacity during infectious disease emergencies. This study found that while 17 (55%) LHDs reported having a mutual aid agreement with at least one other organization for emergency response, only nine (29%) LHDs have a mutual aid agreement specifically for epidemiology and surveillance functions. CONCLUSIONS: LHDs rely on a diverse workforce to conduct epidemiology and public health surveillance functions, emphasizing the need to identify and describe the types of staff positions that could benefit from public health surveillance and epidemiology training. While some organizations collaborate with external partners to support these functions during an emergency, many LHDs do not rely on mutual aid agreements for epidemiology and surveillance activities.
OBJECTIVE: Public health surveillance and epidemiologic investigations are critical public health functions for identifying threats to the health of a community. We conducted a survey of local health departments (LHDs) in California to describe the workforce that supports public health surveillance and epidemiologic functions during routine and emergency infectious disease situations. METHODS: The target population consisted of the 61 LHDs in California. The online survey instrument was designed to collect information about the workforce involved in key epidemiologic functions. We also examined how the public health workforce increases its epidemiologic capacity during infectious disease emergencies. RESULTS: Of 61 LHDs in California, 31 (51%) completed the survey. A wide range of job classifications contribute to epidemiologic functions routinely, and LHDs rely on both internal and external sources of epidemiologic surge capacity during infectious disease emergencies. This study found that while 17 (55%) LHDs reported having a mutual aid agreement with at least one other organization for emergency response, only nine (29%) LHDs have a mutual aid agreement specifically for epidemiology and surveillance functions. CONCLUSIONS: LHDs rely on a diverse workforce to conduct epidemiology and public health surveillance functions, emphasizing the need to identify and describe the types of staff positions that could benefit from public health surveillance and epidemiology training. While some organizations collaborate with external partners to support these functions during an emergency, many LHDs do not rely on mutual aid agreements for epidemiology and surveillance activities.
Authors: Matthew L Boulton; James Hadler; Angela J Beck; Lisa Ferland; Maureen Lichtveld Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Wayne T A Enanoria; Adam W Crawley; Winston Tseng; Jasmine Furnish; Jeannie Balido; Tomás J Aragón Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emily Belita; Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Alanna Miller; Laura N Anderson; Emma Apatu; Olivier Bellefleur; Lydia Kapiriri; Kristin Read; Diana Sherifali; Jean-Éric Tarride; Maureen Dobbins Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Colton Margus; Natasha Brown; Attila J Hertelendy; Michelle R Safferman; Alexander Hart; Gregory R Ciottone Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Brandon Grimm; Athena K Ramos; Shannon Maloney; Chad Abresch; Melissa Tibbits; Kiara Lyons; David Palm Journal: J Community Health Date: 2021-08-13