Mary V Davis1, Christine A Bevc2, Anna P Schenck2. 1. University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, North Carolina Institute for Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC ; Current affiliation: Project Y Evaluation Services, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, North Carolina Institute for Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In response to public health systems and services research priorities, we examined the extent to which participation in accreditation and performance improvement programs can be expected to enhance preparedness capacities. METHODS: Using data collected by the Local Health Department Preparedness Capacities Assessment Survey, we applied a series of weighted least-squares models to examine the effect of program participation on each of the eight preparedness domain scores. Participation was differentiated across four groups: North Carolina (NC) accredited local health departments (LHDs), NC non-accredited LHDs, national comparison LHDs that participated in performance or preparedness programs, and national comparison LHDs that did not participate in any program. RESULTS: Domain scores varied among the four groups. Statistically significant positive participation effects were observed on six of eight preparedness domains for NC accreditation programs, on seven domains for national comparison group LHDs that participated in performance programs, and on four domains for NC non-accredited LHDs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, accreditation and other performance improvement programs have a significant and positive effect on preparedness capacities. While we found no differences among accredited and non-accredited NC LHDs, this lack of significant difference in preparedness scores among NC LHDs is attributed to NC's robust statewide preparedness program, as well as a likely exposure effect among non-accredited NC LHDs to the accreditation program.
OBJECTIVE: In response to public health systems and services research priorities, we examined the extent to which participation in accreditation and performance improvement programs can be expected to enhance preparedness capacities. METHODS: Using data collected by the Local Health Department Preparedness Capacities Assessment Survey, we applied a series of weighted least-squares models to examine the effect of program participation on each of the eight preparedness domain scores. Participation was differentiated across four groups: North Carolina (NC) accredited local health departments (LHDs), NC non-accredited LHDs, national comparison LHDs that participated in performance or preparedness programs, and national comparison LHDs that did not participate in any program. RESULTS: Domain scores varied among the four groups. Statistically significant positive participation effects were observed on six of eight preparedness domains for NC accreditation programs, on seven domains for national comparison group LHDs that participated in performance programs, and on four domains for NC non-accredited LHDs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, accreditation and other performance improvement programs have a significant and positive effect on preparedness capacities. While we found no differences among accredited and non-accredited NC LHDs, this lack of significant difference in preparedness scores among NC LHDs is attributed to NC's robust statewide preparedness program, as well as a likely exposure effect among non-accredited NC LHDs to the accreditation program.
Authors: F Douglas Scutchfield; Evelyn A Knight; Ann V Kelly; Michelyn W Bhandari; Ilie Puiu Vasilescu Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2004 May-Jun
Authors: Mary V Davis; Glen P Mays; James Bellamy; Christine A Bevc; Cammie Marti Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Christa-Marie Singleton; Liza Corso; Deborah Koester; Valeria Carlson; Christine A Bevc; Mary V Davis Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2014 Jan-Feb
Authors: Mary V Davis; Elizabeth Mahanna; Brenda Joly; Michael Zelek; William Riley; Pooja Verma; Jessica Solomon Fisher Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 9.308