Literature DB >> 25355220

Difference in the gain in the phototransduction cascade between rods and cones in carp.

Naoto Kawakami1, Satoru Kawamura2.   

Abstract

In the vertebrate retina, there are two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones. Rods are highly light-sensitive and cones are less light-sensitive. One of the possible mechanisms accounting for the lower light-sensitivity in cones would be lower signal amplification, i.e., lower gain in the phototransduction cascade in cones. In this study, we compared the difference in the gain between rods and cones electrophysiologically in carp. The initial rising phases of the light responses were analyzed to determine an index of the gain, G, a parameter that can be used to compare the gain among cells of varying outer segment volumes. G (in fL · sec(-2)) was 91.2 ± 14.8 (n = 5) in carp rods and 25.3 ± 3.2 (n = 4) in carp red cones, so that the gain in carp red cones is ∼1/4 of that in carp rods. G was also determined in bullfrog rods and was 81.0 ± 17.2 (n = 3) which was very similar to that in carp rods. The difference in the gain between rods and cones in carp determined in this study (∼1/4 in cones compared with rods) is consistent with that we recently determined biochemically (∼1/5 in cones compared with rods). Together with the result obtained in bullfrog rods in this study and the results obtained by others, we concluded that the gain in the cascade is several-fold lower in cones than in rods in carp and probably in other animal species also.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3414682-05$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355220      PMCID: PMC6608423          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3389-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  2 in total

1.  Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Luba Astakhova; Michael Firsov; Victor Govardovskii
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.367

2.  Origins of the phototransduction delay as inferred from stochastic and deterministic simulation of the amplification cascade.

Authors:  Alexander Yu Rotov; Luba A Astakhova; Michael L Firsov; Victor I Govardovskii
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.367

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.