Qian Lu1, Jin You2, Jenny Man3, Alice Loh4, Lucy Young4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston in Texas. 2. Department of Psychology, Wuhan University in China. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Houston. 4. Herald Cancer Association, San Gabriel, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a social support intervention that was culturally tailored for Chinese Americans who face many challenges because of cultural and linguistic barriers. DESIGN: Intervention with a one-group pre- or post-test design, mixed methods, and a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. SETTING: Southern California. SAMPLE: 14 Chinese American breast cancer survivors post-treatment and eight breast cancer peer mentors. METHODS: The intervention was a 10-week program to provide emotional and informational support through peer mentoring and education. Health outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention. Eight weekly process evaluations and two focus group interviews also were conducted. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Depressive and anxiety symptoms. FINDINGS: The program was associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms. Participants valued the program highly. Inductive analysis suggested possible mechanisms for effectiveness, such as reducing stigma, empowerment, and increased sense of belonging. CONCLUSIONS: The peer-mentoring and education program has the potential to serve as a model intervention for ethnic minorities. Mixed methods and CBPR are valuable in evaluating pilot interventions with minorities. Focusing on relationships may be fruitful for designing novel interventions for cancer survivors from collectivistic cultures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Peer-mentoring and education programs can be integrated into communities and clinics to improve care for underserved minority cancer survivors and to reduce health disparities.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a social support intervention that was culturally tailored for Chinese Americans who face many challenges because of cultural and linguistic barriers. DESIGN: Intervention with a one-group pre- or post-test design, mixed methods, and a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. SETTING: Southern California. SAMPLE: 14 Chinese American breast cancer survivors post-treatment and eight breast cancer peer mentors. METHODS: The intervention was a 10-week program to provide emotional and informational support through peer mentoring and education. Health outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention. Eight weekly process evaluations and two focus group interviews also were conducted. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Depressive and anxiety symptoms. FINDINGS: The program was associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms. Participants valued the program highly. Inductive analysis suggested possible mechanisms for effectiveness, such as reducing stigma, empowerment, and increased sense of belonging. CONCLUSIONS: The peer-mentoring and education program has the potential to serve as a model intervention for ethnic minorities. Mixed methods and CBPR are valuable in evaluating pilot interventions with minorities. Focusing on relationships may be fruitful for designing novel interventions for cancer survivors from collectivistic cultures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Peer-mentoring and education programs can be integrated into communities and clinics to improve care for underserved minority cancer survivors and to reduce health disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chinese American; breast cancer survivors; culturally tailored; peer mentorship; psychosocial intervention; social support
Authors: Annette L Stanton; Patricia A Ganz; Lorna Kwan; Beth E Meyerowitz; Julienne E Bower; Janice L Krupnick; Julia H Rowland; Beth Leedham; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katharine Hodgkinson; Phyllis Butow; Glenn E Hunt; Susan Pendlebury; Kim M Hobbs; Gerard Wain Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Barbara L Andersen; Hae-Chung Yang; William B Farrar; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Charles F Emery; Lisa M Thornton; Donn C Young; William E Carson Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Qian Lu; Nelson Yeung; Jenny Man; Matthew W Gallagher; Qiao Chu; Sidra H Deen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Krystal Warmoth; Nelson C Y Yeung; Jing Xie; Hannah Feng; Alice Loh; Lucy Young; Qian Lu Journal: Behav Med Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 3.104
Authors: Susan E Collins; Seema L Clifasefi; Joey Stanton; Kee J E Straits; Eleanor Gil-Kashiwabara; Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa; Andel V Nicasio; Michele P Andrasik; Starlyn M Hawes; Kimberly A Miller; Lonnie A Nelson; Victoria E Orfaly; Bonnie M Duran; Nina Wallerstein Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2018-01-22