| Literature DB >> 25354896 |
ZhiJian Zhang1, JianGuo Shen2, Hang Wang3, Meng Liu3, LongHua Wu4, Fan Ping3, Qiang He5, HongYi Li3, ChangFeng Zheng6, XinHua Xu3.
Abstract
Animal waste from concentrated class="Species">swine farms is widely considered to be a source ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25354896 PMCID: PMC5381375 DOI: 10.1038/srep06844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Cumulative and daily antibiotic reduction in vermicompost after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6) during swine manure larvae vermicomposting.
Nine common antibiotics were detected: tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC), chlortetracycline (CTC), doxycycline (DOC), sulfadiazine (SDZ), norfloxacin (NFC), ofloxacin (OFC), ciprofloxacin (CFC), and enrofloxacin (EFC).
Cumulative and daily reduction rates of antibiotics after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6) during swine manure vermicomposting using the housefly larvae
| TC | OTC | CTC | DOC | SDZ | NFC | OFC | CFC | EFC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-1 | 0.186 ± 0.005c | 5.23 ± 0.34 c | 3.67 ± 0.03d | 0.204 ± 0.014d | 0.945 ± 0.30d | 0.476 ± 0.031b | 0.119 ± 0.004d | 10.7 ± 0.5d | 3.20 ± 040d |
| T-3 | 0.452 ± 0.027b | 14.5 ± 1.0b | 6.65 ± 0.43c | 0.332 ± 0.016c | 2.74 ± 0.06c | 0.356 ± 0.017c | 0.523 ± 0.017c | 16.8 ± 0.5c | 6.57 ± 0.24c |
| T-5 | 0.542 ± 0.046a | 23.7 ± 0.4a | 7.62 ± 0.25b | 0.644 ± 0.010b | 3.82 ± 0.03b | 1.17 ± 0.04a | 1.51 ± 0.05a | 29.9 ± 1.4b | 8.58 ± 0.56a |
| T-6 | 0.595 ± 0.037a | 23.8 ± 0.5a | 8.34 ± 0.06a | 0.713 ± 0.011a | 4.09 ± 0.12a | 1.17 ± 0.02a | 0.857 ± 0.036b | 32.9 ± 1.4a | 7.92 ± 0.18b |
| T-1 | 0.194 ± 0.007a | 5.24 ± 0.34a | 3.67 ± 0.00a | 0.216 ± 0.019a | 0.935 ± 0.033a | 0.476 ± 0.031a | 0.123 ± 0.051c | 10.9 ± 0.6a | 3.20 ± 0.40a |
| T-3 | 0.145 ± 0.020b | 5.26 ± 0.15a | 2.20 ± 0.18b | 0.104 ± 0.010c | 0.913 ± 0.020a | 0.119 ± 0.007d | 0.174 ± 0.006b | 5.36 ± 0.26b | 2.19 ± 0.08b |
| T-5 | 0.108 ± 0.009c | 4.82 ± 0.14a | 1.43 ± 0.67c | 0.144 ± 0.003b | 0.808 ± 0.027b | 0.238 ± 0.011b | 0.298 ± 0.012a | 5.94 ± 0.27b | 1.72 ± 0.11c |
| T-6 | 0.099 ± 0.006c | 3.92 ± 0.08b | 1.39 ± 0.10c | 0.112 ± 0.007c | 0.630 ± 0.011c | 0.196 ± 0.003bc | 0.139 ± 0.008c | 5.49 ± 0.22b | 1.33 ± 0.33d |
Figure 2Dynamics of cumulative input of raw manure, mass of vermicompost, and reductions in raw manure and moisture (a), daily reduction rate and percentage of moisture (b), temperature and pH changes (c), and intensity of mineralization (d) during swine manure larvae vermicomposting.
Figure 3Cumulative and daily reduction rates or percentages of organic matter (OM), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total phosphorus (TP), and total potassium (TK) for vermicompost after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6) during swine manure larvae vermicomposting.
Enzymatic activities (mmol h−1 g−1 dry weight basis) of raw manure over time (C-0, C-3, C-6) and vermicomposts after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6) during swine manure vermicomposting. Four hydrolytic enzymes involved in carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling were investigated in this study, including β-1,4-glucosidase (βG), cellobiohydrolase (CBH), β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), and acid phosphatase (AP)
| βG | CBH | NAG | AP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Value | Ratio | Value | Ratio | Value | Ratio | Value | Ratio |
| 294 ± 23bc | --- | 633 ± 57b | --- | 534 ± 93b | --- | 34.8 ± 0.7c | --- | |
| 312 ± 48bc | 0.06 | 607 ± 35b | ± 0.04 | 558 ± 55b | 0.04 | 40.4 ± 3.5c | 0.16 | |
| 388 ± 26b | 0.32 | 628 ± 41b | −0.01 | 512 ± 32b | −0.04 | 38.6 ± 9.6c | 0.11 | |
| 251 ± 11c | −0.15 | 758 ± 61a | 0.20 | 722 ± 49a | 0.35 | 65.5 ± 6.5a | 0.86 | |
| 377 ± 35b | 0.28 | 749 ± 6a | 0.18 | 653 ± 24ab | 0.22 | 51.2 ± 1.3b | 0.47 | |
| 525 ± 40a | 0.79 | 641 ± 26ab | 0.01 | 545 ± 13b | 0.02 | 47.9 ± 2.5b | 0.38 | |
| 369 ± 1b | 0.19 | 535 ± 29c | −0.15 | 207 ± 28c | −0.61 | 25.9 ± 0.1d | −0.26 | |
*The response ratio (Ratio) was calculated as: the difference of [mean of enzymatic activity in manure/vermicompost on the i-th day (d) minus mean of enzymatic activity in fresh manure on day 0 (i.e., C-0)] divided by the mean of enzymatic activity in fresh manure on day 0 (i.e., C-0).
Figure 4The distribution of sequences in the dominant bacterial phyla from raw swine manure (C-0) and vermicompost after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6).
Relative abundances are based on the proportional frequencies of those DNA sequences that could be classified at the phylum level. The percent values are presented within the respective sections in the columns.
Figure 5The relationship between antibiotic attenuation and physic-biochemical variables by redundancy analysis (RDA).
Figure 6The relationship between antibiotic attenuation and dominant bacterial phyla from raw manure (C-0) and vermicompost after 1 (T-1), 3 (T-3), 5 (T-5), and 6 days (T-6) during swine manure larvae vermicomposting.