Literature DB >> 25354299

Orphan drugs revisited: cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of mifamurtide to the conventional treatment of osteosarcoma.

Max Brosa1, Xavier García del Muro, Jaume Mora, Alba Villacampa, Tamara Pozo-Rubio, Laia Cubells, Carmen Montoto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mepact(®) (mifamurtide) is the first drug approved for the treatment of high-grade resectable non-metastatic osteosarcoma in patients aged 2-30 in the last 20 years. It follows a randomized clinical trial showing a statistically-significant and clinically-relevant decrease in the risk of death without compromising safety. AIM: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of mifamurtide.
METHODS: The economic evaluation was done on a hypothetical cohort of young patients under the age of 30 with high-grade, non-metastatic, resectable osteosarcoma. Standard chemotherapy without mifamurtide was used as comparator. A Markov model was adapted using Spanish costs and the results of the INT-0133 Phase III study. The analysis has been carried out from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service, with a time horizon of up to 60 years in the base analysis.
RESULTS: The observed greater efficacy of mifamurtide in the trial translates into a gain of 3.03 (undiscounted) and 1.33 (discounted) quality-adjusted life years at an additional cost of €102,000. The estimated budgetary impact of using mifamurtide in 10-100% of the potential population would cost €671,000 and €6.7 million respectively.
CONCLUSION: The cost per quality-adjusted life years gained with mifamurtide in Spain is in the low band (<€100,000) of the iCERs obtained by other orphan drugs and would have a limited and affordable cost in Spain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QALY; cost-effectiveness; mifamurtide; orphan drug; osteosarcoma; pharmacoeconomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25354299     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.972378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  5 in total

Review 1.  Osteogenic Sarcoma: Systemic Chemotherapy Options for Localized Disease.

Authors:  Douglas J Harrison; Cindy L Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-04

2.  Effectiveness of electrical stimulation for postoperative pain in patients with osteosarcoma: A systematic review protocol of clinical controlled trial.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Hua-Yu Tang; Tian-Shu Wang; Wei Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in Children and Young Adults in Spain.

Authors:  Josep Maria Ribera Santasusana; Alejandra de Andrés Saldaña; Nuria García-Muñoz; Joana Gostkorzewicz; Diana Martínez Llinàs; Cristina Díaz de Heredia
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Of Midostaurin In The Treatment Of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With The FLT3 Mutation In Spain.

Authors:  Ainhoa Arenaza; Raúl Diez; Jordi Esteve; Roberta Di Nicolantonio; Joana Gostkorzewicz; Carlos Martínez; Diana Martínez Llinàs; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Pau Montesinos; Aída Moure-Fernández; Jorge Sierra; Joan Lluís Vinent
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 5.  Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khadidja Abdallah; Isabelle Huys; Kathleen Claes; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.