Literature DB >> 25354168

Soybean plants modify metal oxide nanoparticle effects on soil bacterial communities.

Yuan Ge1, John H Priester, Laurie C Van De Werfhorst, Sharon L Walker, Roger M Nisbet, Youn-Joo An, Joshua P Schimel, Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey, Patricia A Holden.   

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) are entering agricultural soils through land application of nanocontaining biosolids and agrochemicals. The potential adverse effects of ENPs have been studied on food crops and soil bacterial communities separately; however, how ENPs will affect the interacting plant-soil system remains unknown. To address this, we assessed ENP effects on soil microbial communities in soybean-planted, versus unplanted, mesocosms exposed to different doses of nano-CeO2 (0-1.0 g kg(-1)) or nano-ZnO (0-0.5 g kg(-1)). Nano-CeO2 did not affect soil bacterial communities in unplanted soils, but 0.1 g kg(-1) nano-CeO2 altered soil bacterial communities in planted soils, indicating that plants interactively promote nano-CeO2 effects in soil, possibly due to belowground C shifts since plant growth was impacted. Nano-ZnO at 0.5 g kg(-1) significantly altered soil bacterial communities, increasing some (e.g., Rhizobium and Sphingomonas) but decreasing other (e.g., Ensifer, Rhodospirillaceae, Clostridium, and Azotobacter) operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Fewer OTUs decreased from nano-ZnO exposure in planted (41) versus unplanted (85) soils, suggesting that plants ameliorate nano-ZnO effects. Taken together, plants--potentially through their effects on belowground biogeochemistry--could either promote (i.e., for the 0.1 g kg(-1) nano-CeO2 treatment) or limit (i.e., for the 0.5 g kg(-1) nano-ZnO treatment) ENP effects on soil bacterial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25354168     DOI: 10.1021/es5031646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Soil pH effects on the interactions between dissolved zinc, non-nano- and nano-ZnO with soil bacterial communities.

Authors:  Daniel S Read; Marianne Matzke; Hyun S Gweon; Lindsay K Newbold; Laura Heggelund; Maria Diez Ortiz; Elma Lahive; David Spurgeon; Claus Svendsen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  NanoEHS beyond Toxicity - Focusing on Biocorona.

Authors:  Sijie Lin; Monika Mortimer; Ran Chen; Aleksandr Kakinen; Jim E Riviere; Thomas P Davis; Feng Ding; Pu Chun Ke
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Strategies for robust and accurate experimental approaches to quantify nanomaterial bioaccumulation across a broad range of organisms.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Monika Mortimer; Robert M Burgess; Richard Handy; Shannon Hanna; Kay T Ho; Monique Johnson; Susana Loureiro; Henriette Selck; Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; David Spurgeon; Jason Unrine; Nico van den Brink; Ying Wang; Jason White; Patricia Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019

4.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Agglomeration Determines Effects of Carbonaceous Nanomaterials on Soybean Nodulation, Dinitrogen Fixation Potential, and Growth in Soil.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Chong Hyun Chang; Zhaoxia Ji; Dermont C Bouchard; Roger M Nisbet; Joshua P Schimel; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Metal citrate nanoparticles: a robust water-soluble plant micronutrient source.

Authors:  K S V Poorna Chandrika; Dinabandhu Patra; Praduman Yadav; A Aziz Qureshi; Balaji Gopalan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 7.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Iron Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Effects on Plant Performance and Root Associated Microbes.

Authors:  David J Burke; Nicole Pietrasiak; Shu F Situ; Eric C Abenojar; Mya Porche; Pawel Kraj; Yutthana Lakliang; Anna Cristina S Samia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Potential Iron Fertilizer for Peanut (Arachis hypogaea).

Authors:  Mengmeng Rui; Chuanxin Ma; Yi Hao; Jing Guo; Yukui Rui; Xinlian Tang; Qi Zhao; Xing Fan; Zetian Zhang; Tianqi Hou; Siyuan Zhu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Evaluation of DNA extraction kits and phylogenetic diversity of the porcine gastrointestinal tract based on Illumina sequencing of two hypervariable regions.

Authors:  Katharina Burbach; Jana Seifert; Dietmar H Pieper; Amélia Camarinha-Silva
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.