Literature DB >> 25353200

Use of artificial neural networks to predict recurrent lumbar disk herniation.

Parisa Azimi1, Hassan R Mohammadi, Edward C Benzel, Sohrab Shahzadi, Shirzad Azhari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict recurrent lumbar disk herniation (LDH).
METHODS: An ANN model and a logistic regression model were used to predict recurrent LDH. The age, sex, duration of symptoms, smoking status, recurrent LDH, level of herniation, type of herniation, sports activity; occupational lifting, occupational driving, duration of symptoms, visual analog scale (VAS), the Zung Depression Scale (ZDS), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score, were determined as the input variables for the established ANN model. The Macnab classification, VAS, and JOA were used for outcome assessment. ANNs on data from LDH patients, who underwent surgery, were trained to predict LDH using several input variables. The patients were divided into a recurrent LDH group (R group) and a primary LDH group (P group). Sensitivity analysis was applied to identify the relevant variables. The receiver-operating characteristic curve, accuracy rate of predicting, and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics were considered for evaluating the 2 models.
RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were categorized into training, testing, and validation data sets consisting of 201, 101, and 100 cases, respectively. The recurrence rate was 8.7%, and the median time to recurrence was 26.2 months (SD=4 mo). The VAS of leg/back pain and JOA were improved at 1-year follow-up (P<0.05) and no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Surgical successful outcome was categorized as: excellent, 31.1%; good, 44.3%; fair, 18.9%; and poor, 5.7% at 1-year follow-up. Compared with the logistic regression model, the ANN model was associated with superior results: accuracy rate, 94.1%; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, 40.2%; and area under the curve, 0.83% of patients.
CONCLUSION: The findings show that an ANNs can be used to predict the diagnostic statues of recurrent and nonrecurrent group of LDH patients before the first or index microdiscectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25353200     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  8 in total

1.  Use of machine learning to model surgical decision-making in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Nathan Xie; Peter J Wilson; Rajesh Reddy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional laminectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Shifeng Jiang; Qingning Li; Hongzhi Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

4.  A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-04-24

5.  Narrative Review of Predictive Analytics of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Kurt Lehner; Jeff Ehresman; Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Daniel Lubelski; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-09

6.  Image Quality Control in Lumbar Spine Radiography Using Enhanced U-Net Neural Networks.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Qingshan Deng; Qiang Wang; Xinmiao Liu; Lei Chen; Jinjin Liu; Shuangquan Li; Meihao Wang; Guoquan Cao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Venkat Boddapati; Joseph M Lombardi; Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Nicholas C Danford; Rajiv R Iyer; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Feasibility and Assessment of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Outcome After Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

Authors:  Arthur André; Bruno Peyrou; Alexandre Carpentier; Jean-Jacques Vignaux
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.