Mel E Major-Helsloot1, Lynette C Crous2, Karen Grimmer-Somers3, Quinette A Louw2. 1. Physiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa ; European School of Physiotherapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences/Hogeschool van Amsterdam, PO Box 2557, 1000 CN Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Physiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Physiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa ; International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, School of Health Sciences, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary Health Care (PHC) is well suited for management of low back pain (LBP). Prevalence of (chronic) LBP is suspected to be high among visitors of the South African primary care centers, but currently no information exists on prevalence or guideline adherence. OBJECTIVES: To establish if treatment received for LBP in public PHC in the Cape Town area compares with international evidence based guidelines. METHODS: Cluster randomization determined the 8 community health centres where the study took place. A measurement tool was developed and validated for this population. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analytical techniques were applied. RESULTS: 489 participants (mean age: 44.8) were included in this study. Lifetime prevalence was 73.2% and 26.3% suffered from chronic low back pain (CLBP) . Pain medication was the only form of treatment received by 90% of the sample. Interventions received seemed to be unrelated to type of LBP (acute, sub acute and chronic). Referral to physiotherapy, education and advice to stay active were rarely done. Participants expressed low satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Current management of LBP at PHC level appears to be ineffective and not conform guidelines. Further South African research should focus on barriers as well as measures to be taken for implementation of LBP guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Primary Health Care (PHC) is well suited for management of low back pain (LBP). Prevalence of (chronic) LBP is suspected to be high among visitors of the South African primary care centers, but currently no information exists on prevalence or guideline adherence. OBJECTIVES: To establish if treatment received for LBP in public PHC in the Cape Town area compares with international evidence based guidelines. METHODS: Cluster randomization determined the 8 community health centres where the study took place. A measurement tool was developed and validated for this population. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analytical techniques were applied. RESULTS: 489 participants (mean age: 44.8) were included in this study. Lifetime prevalence was 73.2% and 26.3% suffered from chronic low back pain (CLBP) . Pain medication was the only form of treatment received by 90% of the sample. Interventions received seemed to be unrelated to type of LBP (acute, sub acute and chronic). Referral to physiotherapy, education and advice to stay active were rarely done. Participants expressed low satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Current management of LBP at PHC level appears to be ineffective and not conform guidelines. Further South African research should focus on barriers as well as measures to be taken for implementation of LBP guidelines.
Entities:
Keywords:
Low back pain; South Africa; guidelines; management; primary care
Authors: John W Beasley; Barbara Starfield; Chris van Weel; Walter W Rosser; Cynthia L Haq Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Francisco M Kovacs; Carmen Fernández; Antonio Cordero; Alfonso Muriel; Luis González-Luján; María Teresa Gil del Real Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2006-05-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Christine Cedraschi; Margareta Nordin; Scott Haldeman; Kristi Randhawa; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-01-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Carmen Hawker; Laura O'Connor; Poovendhree Reddy; Firoza Haffejee; Maureen N Sibiya; Dorinda Borg; Shanaz Ghuman; Thembilihle S P Ngxongo; Nalini Govender Journal: Health SA Date: 2021-07-30
Authors: Alshaymaa M Arishy; Mohammed Salih Mahfouz; Husameldin E Khalafalla; Mostafa M E Atteya; Yahya H Khormi Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2022-08-25