| Literature DB >> 25352695 |
Yousry Hawash1, Laila Sh Dorgham2, Ayman S Al-Hazmi3, Mohammed S Al-Ghamdi3.
Abstract
Cryptosporidium diarrhea represents a relevant clinical problem in developing countries. In Al-Taif, a city of Saudi Arabia that lies at an altitude of an around 2 km above the sea level, Cryptosporidium infection seems to be undiagnosed in nearly all clinical laboratories. Furthermore, nothing was published regarding Cryptosporidium-associated diarrhea in this area. The objectives of this research were to (1) determine the Cryptosporidium prevalence among patients with diarrhea and (2) to estimate the performances of 3 different diagnostic methods. Total 180 diarrheal fecal samples, 1 sample per patient, were collected between January and August 2013. Samples were screened for Cryptosporidium with modified Zeihl Neelsen (ZN) microscopy, RIDA® Quick lateral flow (LF) immunotest, and a previously published PCR. The Cryptosporidium prevalence rate was 9.4% (17/180), 10% (18/180), and 11.6% (21/180) by microscopy, LF, and PCR test, respectively. Infection was significantly (P=0.004) predominant among children <5 years (22%) followed by children 5-9 years (11.1%). Although infection was higher in males than in females (16.2% males and 8.5% females), the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.11). Compared to PCR, the sensitivity of microscopy and the LF test were 80.9%, 85.7%, respectively. To conclude, high Cryptosporidium-associated diarrhea was found in this area especially in children ≤9 years. The PCR test showed the best performance followed by the LF test and ZN staining microscopy. The primary health care providers in Al-Taif need to be aware of and do testing for this protozoon, particularly for children seen with diarrhea.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; PCR; diarrhea; high altitude; lateral flow test; microscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25352695 PMCID: PMC4210729 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2014.52.5.479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Fig. 1Microscopic picture of Cryptosporidium oocysts (red) in a wet mount smear prepared from a fecal specimen concentrated by modified formol-ether method and stained following the modified Zeihl Neelsen procedure (×400 magnification).
Concordance (number and percentage) of the microscopy results with the LF test
aOne sample showed a discordance result (negative by microscopy but positive by the LF test) and proved to be positive by PCR.
bHighly significant by Fisher's exact test.
Concordance (number and percentage) of microscopy results with the PCR assay
aSamples showed discordance results (these 4 samples were oocyst-negative by microscopy but proved to be Cryptosporidium DNA-positive by PCR).
bHighly significant by Fisher's exact test.
Fig. 2Representative ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gel electrophoresis picture showing the PCR test results of 12 samples (Lane 1-12) diagnosed as Cryptosporidium-negative by the LF test. M: GeneRuler™ 100 bp DNA marker; Lanes 1, 3, and 12: PCR products, ≈550 bp each, recovered from Cryptosporidium DNA-positive samples. Lane 2, 4-11: Cryptosporidium DNA-negative samples. Lane 13: PCR-negative control (master mix without template DNA).
Concordance (number and percentage) of the LF test results with the PCR assay
aSamples with discordance results (i.e., these 3 samples were negative for Cryptosporidium oocysts by microscopy as well as by the LF test but proved to be positive for DNA by the PCR assay).
bHighly significant by Fisher's exact test.
Fig. 3Age-distribution of 4 patients diagnosed as Cryptosporidium-negative by microscopy and proved to be positive by the PCR assay.
PCR test results of 180 samples distributed by age groups
PCR test results (number and percentage) distributed by gender
The diagnostic performance of microscopy and the LF test versus the PCR test results
SE, sensitivity; SP, specificity; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.