BACKGROUND: Individuals with a high risk of stroke are also more prone to cognitive impairment perhaps because of concomitant vascular risk factors. In addition, clinical stroke increases the risk of subsequent dementia. Nevertheless, the relationship between clinical stroke and subsequent cognitive function in initially nondemented individuals remains less clear as most prior studies examined case series without controls. AIMS: To specify among nondemented individuals the cognitive domains affected by clinical stroke, independently of vascular risk factors and prestroke cognition. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two Framingham study participants (mean age = 77 ± 9 years, 54% women) with prospectively validated initial strokes, as well as age- and gender-matched controls, underwent identical cognitive evaluations ∼six-months after the stroke. Linear regression models were used to assess the differences in cognitive scores between stroke cases and controls adjusting for prestroke cognitive function as assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination scores, and with and without adjustment for vascular risk factors. RESULTS: Adjusting for prestroke cognition and vascular risk factors, persons with stroke had poorer cognitive function in the domains of immediate recall of logical and visual memories (β = -1·27 ± 0·60, P = 0·035; β = -1·03 ± 0·47, P = 0·028, respectively), verbal learning (paired associate test; β = -1·31 ± 0·57, P = 0·023), language (Boston naming test; β = -0·27 ± 0·08, P = 0·002), executive function (digit span backward; β = -0·53 ± 0·21, P = 0·015), and visuospatial and motor skills (block design; β = -3·02 ± 1·06, P = 0·005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stroke is associated with subsequent poorer performance in multiple cognitive domains. This association cannot be entirely explained by the individual's cognitive function prior to stroke or by concomitant vascular risk factor levels.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with a high risk of stroke are also more prone to cognitive impairment perhaps because of concomitant vascular risk factors. In addition, clinical stroke increases the risk of subsequent dementia. Nevertheless, the relationship between clinical stroke and subsequent cognitive function in initially nondemented individuals remains less clear as most prior studies examined case series without controls. AIMS: To specify among nondemented individuals the cognitive domains affected by clinical stroke, independently of vascular risk factors and prestroke cognition. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two Framingham study participants (mean age = 77 ± 9 years, 54% women) with prospectively validated initial strokes, as well as age- and gender-matched controls, underwent identical cognitive evaluations ∼six-months after the stroke. Linear regression models were used to assess the differences in cognitive scores between stroke cases and controls adjusting for prestroke cognitive function as assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination scores, and with and without adjustment for vascular risk factors. RESULTS: Adjusting for prestroke cognition and vascular risk factors, persons with stroke had poorer cognitive function in the domains of immediate recall of logical and visual memories (β = -1·27 ± 0·60, P = 0·035; β = -1·03 ± 0·47, P = 0·028, respectively), verbal learning (paired associate test; β = -1·31 ± 0·57, P = 0·023), language (Boston naming test; β = -0·27 ± 0·08, P = 0·002), executive function (digit span backward; β = -0·53 ± 0·21, P = 0·015), and visuospatial and motor skills (block design; β = -3·02 ± 1·06, P = 0·005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stroke is associated with subsequent poorer performance in multiple cognitive domains. This association cannot be entirely explained by the individual's cognitive function prior to stroke or by concomitant vascular risk factor levels.
Authors: Cristina S Ivan; Sudha Seshadri; Alexa Beiser; Rhoda Au; Carlos S Kase; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Philip A Wolf Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Merrill F Elias; Lisa M Sullivan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Penelope K Elias; Alexa Beiser; Rhoda Au; Sudha Seshadri; Charles DeCarli; Philip A Wolf Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lawrence S Honig; Ming-Xin Tang; Steven Albert; Rosanne Costa; Jose Luchsinger; Jennifer Manly; Yaakov Stern; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-12
Authors: Rhoda Au; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Merrill Elias; Penelope Elias; Lisa Sullivan; Alexa Beiser; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2004 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: V K Srikanth; J F I Anderson; G A Donnan; M M Saling; E Didus; R Alpitsis; H M Dewey; R A L Macdonell; A G Thrift Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-09-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Philipp Ettelt; Ilko L Maier; Marlena Schnieder; Mathias Bähr; Daniel Behme; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Jan Liman Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2020-07-27
Authors: Selma Lugtmeijer; Nikki A Lammers; Edward H F de Haan; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Roy P C Kessels Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Elena López-Cancio; Tudor G Jovin; Erik Cobo; Neus Cerdá; Marta Jiménez; Meritxell Gomis; María Hernández-Pérez; Cynthia Cáceres; Pere Cardona; Blanca Lara; Arturo Renú; Laura Llull; Sandra Boned; Marian Muchada; Antoni Dávalos Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wei Zhen Chow; Lin Kooi Ong; Murielle G Kluge; Prajwal Gyawali; Frederick R Walker; Michael Nilsson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.379