BACKGROUND: The misuse and abuse of prescription opioids have become an urgent health issue in North Carolina (NC), particularly among Medicaid patients who suffer high rates of morbidity and mortality due to abuse and overdose. The NC Division of Medical Assistance (DMA) implemented a recipient management lock-in program, which limits identified patients for a 12-month period to 1 prescriber and 1 pharmacy for benzodiazepine, opiate, and certain anxiolytic prescriptions in order to prevent misuse and reduce overutilization of Medicaid benefits. OBJECTIVES: To (a) evaluate pharmacists' perceptions of the implementation of the NC recipient management lock-in program (MLIP) and (b) determine how the beliefs and attitudes of pharmacists could promote or inhibit its success. METHODS: We conducted 12 structured phone interviews with NC pharmacists serving lock-in patients. Interview responses were analyzed through construct analysis, which identified themes organized into 3 domains: organization and implementation, perceived effectiveness, and acceptability. RESULTS: Most respondents reported a positive experience with the program but expressed doubt concerning its impact on prescription drug abuse. The program successfully utilized the pharmacist role as a gatekeeper of controlled substances, and the procedures of the program required no active effort on pharmacists' part. However, respondents suggested that the DMA improve communication and outreach to address pharmacists' lack of knowledge about the program's purpose and confusion over remediating problems that arise with lock-in patients. The DMA should also address the ways in which the program can interfere with access to health care and treatment, allow patients to see multiple physicians within the same clinic, and clarify procedures for patients whose complex health issues require multiple specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Although possible improvements were identified, the NC MLIP has strong potential for success as it utilizes pharmacists' medication gate-keeping role, while minimizing the effort required for successful implementation.
BACKGROUND: The misuse and abuse of prescription opioids have become an urgent health issue in North Carolina (NC), particularly among Medicaid patients who suffer high rates of morbidity and mortality due to abuse and overdose. The NC Division of Medical Assistance (DMA) implemented a recipient management lock-in program, which limits identified patients for a 12-month period to 1 prescriber and 1 pharmacy for benzodiazepine, opiate, and certain anxiolytic prescriptions in order to prevent misuse and reduce overutilization of Medicaid benefits. OBJECTIVES: To (a) evaluate pharmacists' perceptions of the implementation of the NC recipient management lock-in program (MLIP) and (b) determine how the beliefs and attitudes of pharmacists could promote or inhibit its success. METHODS: We conducted 12 structured phone interviews with NC pharmacists serving lock-in patients. Interview responses were analyzed through construct analysis, which identified themes organized into 3 domains: organization and implementation, perceived effectiveness, and acceptability. RESULTS: Most respondents reported a positive experience with the program but expressed doubt concerning its impact on prescription drug abuse. The program successfully utilized the pharmacist role as a gatekeeper of controlled substances, and the procedures of the program required no active effort on pharmacists' part. However, respondents suggested that the DMA improve communication and outreach to address pharmacists' lack of knowledge about the program's purpose and confusion over remediating problems that arise with lock-in patients. The DMA should also address the ways in which the program can interfere with access to health care and treatment, allow patients to see multiple physicians within the same clinic, and clarify procedures for patients whose complex health issues require multiple specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Although possible improvements were identified, the NC MLIP has strong potential for success as it utilizes pharmacists' medication gate-keeping role, while minimizing the effort required for successful implementation.
Authors: Charles Glisson; John Landsverk; Sonja Schoenwald; Kelly Kelleher; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Stephen Mayberg; Philip Green Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2007-12-18
Authors: Howard G Birnbaum; Alan G White; Matt Schiller; Tracy Waldman; Jody M Cleveland; Carl L Roland Journal: Pain Med Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Andrew W Roberts; Joel F Farley; G Mark Holmes; Christine U Oramasionwu; Chris Ringwalt; Betsy Sleath; Asheley C Skinner Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 6.301