Literature DB >> 25351952

International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines.

Irene Hirschberg1, Hannes Kahrass1, Daniel Strech1.   

Abstract

Several stakeholders in the field of biobank research are currently developing and evaluating innovative consent procedures, and in doing so refer to national and international guidelines that regulate biomedical research. The objectives of this study were to present (1) a synthesis of all consent issues mentioned or required in guidelines that are of potential relevance to biobank research and (2) a detailed overview of similarities and differences between these guidelines. This analysis considered a purposive sample of the nine most internationally recognised research guidelines plus a national checklist for developing consent forms. The synthesis of all included research guidelines found 41 issues of potential relevance to consent procedures in biobank research. The guidelines differ substantially with respect to (1) how comprehensively they address these consent issues, (2) their definition and explanation of the issues and (3) how directly or indirectly the issues are mentioned. The set of 41 consent issues presented in this paper should be further developed in a continuous process. Our findings on the differences among major research guidelines also raise the issue of a more systematic development and revision process for these guidelines. The presented set of content issues potentially relevant to consent in biobank research can inform the balanced development or evaluation of consent forms, as well as the development and revision of corresponding research guidelines. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Keywords:  Ethics; Guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25351952     DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  5 in total

1.  How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Gillian Crawford; Claire Salter; Michael Parker; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving 'understanding' in informed consent.

Authors:  Sabine Bossert; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  The generic Informed Consent Service gICS®: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research.

Authors:  Henriette Rau; Lars Geidel; Martin Bialke; Arne Blumentritt; Martin Langanke; Wenke Liedtke; Sandra Pasewald; Dana Stahl; Thomas Bahls; Christian Maier; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 5.  Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.929

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.