Literature DB >> 25351856

In vitro toxicity of formocresol, ferric sulphate, and grey MTA on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.

S N Al-Haj Ali1, S H Al-Jundi, D J Ditto.   

Abstract

AIM: This was to assess and compare the in vitro toxicity of formocresol, ferric sulphate and MTA on cultured human periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. STUDY
DESIGN: PDL cells were obtained from sound first permanent molars and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.
METHODS: PDL cells were subjected to different concentrations of formocresol, ferric sulphate, and grey MTA for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37 °C. Cells that were not exposed to the tested materials served as the negative control. In vitro toxicity was assessed using MTT assay. STATISTICS: Statistical analysis of data was accomplished using ANOVA and Tukey statistical tests (p<0.05).
RESULTS: The overall toxicity ranking of the tested materials was as follows: formocresol>ferric sulphate>grey MTA. Only grey MTA had comparable cell viability to the negative control, the other tested materials were significantly inferior at the three exposure periods (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Regarding the viability of PDL fibroblasts, MTA stands as the most promising substitute to formocresol. However, considering MTA's unavailability and high price in Jordan, ferric sulphate may be the best alternative to formocresol in pulpotomy of primary teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25351856     DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0147-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  22 in total

1.  Cultured pulp fibroblasts: are they suitable for in vitro cytotoxicity testing?

Authors:  C W van Wyk; A Olivier; J S Maritz
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.253

2.  Do we still need formocresol in pediatric dentistry?

Authors:  Michael J Casas; David J Kenny; Peter L Judd; Douglas H Johnston
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  In vitro toxicity of MTA compared with other primary teeth pulpotomy agents.

Authors:  José Vitor Nogara Borges de Menezes; Esther Rieko Takamori; Maria Francisca Thereza Borro Bijella; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.065

4.  Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of glutaraldehyde and formocresol.

Authors:  S D Hill; C W Berry; N S Seale; M Kaga
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1991-01

Review 5.  In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review.

Authors:  C T Hanks; J C Wataha; Z Sun
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Pulpal tissue reaction to formocresol vs. ferric sulfate in pulpotomized rat teeth.

Authors:  O Cotes; J R Boj; C Canalda; M Carreras
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.065

7.  Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.

Authors:  H Noorollahian
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 8.  Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and Treatment perspectives.

Authors:  Anna B Fuks
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

9.  Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials.

Authors:  R M Osorio; A Hefti; F J Vertucci; A L Shawley
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 10.  Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Howard W Roberts; Jeffrey M Toth; David W Berzins; David G Charlton
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pulpal Response to Ferric Sulfate and Diode Laser When Used as Pulpotomy Agent: An In vivo Study.

Authors:  Sonia Sivadas; Arathi Rao; Srikant Natarajan; Ramya Shenoy; Suprabha Baranya Srikrishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 2.  In vitro biocompatibility and bioactivity of calcium silicate‑based bioceramics in endodontics (Review).

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Shue Li; Qingming Tang; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.101

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.