Literature DB >> 25350936

A 3D printed TCP/HA structure as a new osteoconductive scaffold for vertical bone augmentation.

Jean-Pierre Carrel1, Anselm Wiskott2, Mira Moussa2, Philippe Rieder2, Susanne Scherrer2, Stéphane Durual2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: OsteoFlux(®) (OF) is a 3D printed porous block of layered strands of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite. Its porosity and interconnectivity are defined, and it can be readily shaped to conform the bone bed's morphology. We investigated the performance of OF as a scaffold to promote the vertical growth of cortical bone in a sheep calvarial model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six titanium hemispheres were filled with OF, Bio-Oss (particulate bovine bone, BO), or Ceros (particulate TCP, CO) and placed onto the calvaria of 12 adult sheep (6 hemispheres/sheep). Histomorphometric analyses were performed after 8 and 16 weeks.
RESULTS: OF led to substantial vertical bone growth by 8 weeks and outperformed BO and CO by a factor 2 yielding OF 22% ± 2.1; BO 11.5% ± 1.9; and CO 12.9% ± 2.1 total new bone. 3 mm away from the bony bed, OF led to a fourfold increase in new bone relative to BO and CO (n = 8, P < 0.002). At 16 weeks, OF, BO, and CO behaved similarly and showed marked new bone synthesis. A moderate degradation was observed at 16 weeks for all bone substitutes.
CONCLUSION: When compared to existing bone substitutes, OF enhances vertical bone growth during the first 2 months after implantation in a sheep calvarial model. The controlled porous structure translated in a high osteoconductivity and resulted in a bone mass 3 mm above the bony bed that was four times greater than that obtained with standard substitutes. These results are promising but must be confirmed in clinical tests.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experiments; bone regeneration; bone substitutes; guided tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350936     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  21 in total

Review 1.  Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz; Noah Metoki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Influence of different carrier materials on biphasic calcium phosphate induced bone regeneration.

Authors:  Lara Schorn; Tim Fienitz; Maximilian F Gerstenberg; Anja Sterner-Kock; Alexandra C Maul; Julian Lommen; Henrik Holtmann; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  From 3-Dimensional Printing to 5-Dimensional Printing: Enhancing Thoracic Surgical Planning and Resection of Complex Tumors.

Authors:  Erin A Gillaspie; Jane S Matsumoto; Natalie E Morris; Robert J Downey; K Robert Shen; Mark S Allen; Shanda H Blackmon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Comparison of three block bone substitutes for bone regeneration: long-term observation in the beagle dog.

Authors:  Kosaku Sawada; Ken Nakahara; Maiko Haga-Tsujimura; Tateyuki Iizuka; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Kensuke Igarashi; Nikola Saulacic
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Poly(Dopamine)-Assisted Immobilization of Xu Duan on 3D Printed Poly(Lactic Acid) Scaffolds to Up-Regulate Osteogenic and Angiogenic Markers of Bone Marrow Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Yeh; Yi-Wen Chen; Ming-You Shie; Hsin-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Enhanced Stability of Calcium Sulfate Scaffolds with 45S5 Bioglass for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Cijun Shuai; Jianhua Zhou; Ping Wu; Chengde Gao; Pei Feng; Tao Xiao; Youwen Deng; Shuping Peng
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Animal models of vertical bone augmentation (Review).

Authors:  Zepeng Zhang; Yaxin Gan; Yarong Guo; Xuguang Lu; Xianqi Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Effect of Ceramic Scaffold Architectural Parameters on Biological Response.

Authors:  Maria Isabella Gariboldi; Serena M Best
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 10.  3D-Printed Scaffolds and Biomaterials: Review of Alveolar Bone Augmentation and Periodontal Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Farah Asa'ad; Giorgio Pagni; Sophia P Pilipchuk; Aldo Bruno Giannì; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.