Literature DB >> 25350934

Comparing the Induced Muscle Fatigue Between Asynchronous and Synchronous Electrical Stimulation in Able-Bodied and Spinal Cord Injured Populations.

Ryan J Downey, Matthew J Bellman, Hiroyuki Kawai, Chris M Gregory, Warren E Dixon.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to impart a number of health benefits and can be used to produce functional outcomes. However, one limitation of NMES is the onset of NMES-induced fatigue. Multi-channel asynchronous stimulation has been shown to reduce NMES-induced fatigue compared to conventional single-channel stimulation. However, in previous studies in man, the effect of stimulation frequency on the NMES-induced fatigue has not been examined for asynchronous stimulation. Low stimulation frequencies are known to reduce fatigue during conventional stimulation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the fatigue characteristics of high- and low-frequency asynchronous stimulation as well as high- and low-frequency conventional stimulation. Experiments were performed in both able-bodied and spinal cord injured populations. Low frequency asynchronous stimulation is found to have significant fatigue benefits over high frequency asynchronous stimulation as well as high- and low-frequency conventional stimulation, motivating its use for rehabilitation and functional electrical stimulation (FES).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350934     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2364735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  15 in total

Review 1.  How to report electrotherapy parameters and procedures for pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Angélica Mércia Pascon Barbosa; Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto; Cristiane Rodrigues Pedroni; Mariana Arias Avila; Richard Eloin Liebano; Patricia Driusso
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Tapas J Arakeri; J P Reinhard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Selective Nerve Cuff Stimulation Strategies for Prolonging Muscle Output.

Authors:  Kristen T Gelenitis; Brian M Sanner; Ronald J Triolo; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 4.  Strategies for Rapid Muscle Fatigue Reduction during FES Exercise in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Nazirah Hasnan; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab; Glen M Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A foot drop compensation device based on surface multi-field functional electrical stimulation-Usability study in a clinical environment.

Authors:  Eukene Imatz-Ojanguren; Gema Sánchez-Márquez; Jose Ramón Asiain-Aristu; Joxean Cueto-Mendo; Edurne Jaunarena-Goicoechea; Haritz Zabaleta; Thierry Keller
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2019-09-03

6.  Standardizing fatigue-resistance testing during electrical stimulation of paralysed human quadriceps muscles, a practical approach.

Authors:  Martin Schmoll; Ronan Le Guillou; David Lobato Borges; Charles Fattal; Emerson Fachin-Martins; Christine Azevedo Coste
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Ultrasound Echogenicity as an Indicator of Muscle Fatigue during Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Ashwin Iyer; Krysten Lambeth; Kang Kim; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Power output and fatigue properties using spatially distributed sequential stimulation in a dynamic knee extension task.

Authors:  Marco Laubacher; Anil Efe Aksöz; Robert Riener; Stuart Binder-Macleod; Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Advances in neuroprosthetic management of foot drop: a review.

Authors:  Javier Gil-Castillo; Fady Alnajjar; Aikaterini Koutsou; Diego Torricelli; Juan C Moreno
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Optimal Biomechanical Performance in Upper-Limb Gestures Depends on Velocity and Carried Load.

Authors:  Cristina Brambilla; Matteo Malosio; Gianluigi Reni; Alessandro Scano
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.