Literature DB >> 25350620

Trends in bone graft use in the United States.

Ahmet Kinaci, Valentin Neuhaus, David C Ring.   

Abstract

Bone graft and bone graft substitutes are used to provide structural support and enhance bone healing. Autogenous, allogeneic, and artificial bone grafts each have advantages and drawbacks. The development of allografts, synthetic bone grafts, and new operative techniques may have influenced the use of bone grafts in recent years. The goal of this study was to analyze the use of bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in the United States during a 16-year period. Using data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, the authors analyzed the use of autogenous and artificial bone grafts in almost 2 million patients in the United States between 1992 and 2007 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in 4 periods (1992-1995, 1996-1999, 2000-2003, and 2004-2007). Among an estimated almost 2 million bone graft procedures (83% autogenous, 17% artificial), the use of both types of grafts decreased. The main diagnoses for which bone grafts were used did not change; however, cervical spine diseases and lower-limb fractures decreased more remarkably. Although sex (52% male in the early 1990s to 47% in 2000-2003) and discharge status (more discharges to a short-term or long-term-care facility) significantly changed, age increased from 47 to 53 years and inpatient days decreased significantly from 6 to 5 days during the study period. The use of bone grafts and bone graft substitutes is decreasing in the United States, with a slight shift from autogenous to substitute grafts. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350620     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  24 in total

1.  Tantalum coating of porous carbon scaffold supplemented with autologous bone marrow stromal stem cells for bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaowei Wei; Dewei Zhao; Benjie Wang; Wei Wang; Kai Kang; Hui Xie; Baoyi Liu; Xiuzhi Zhang; Jinsong Zhang; Zhenming Yang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-02-02

2.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Octacalcium Phosphate/Gelatin Composite (OCP/Gel) Enhances Bone Repair in a Critical-sized Transcortical Femoral Defect Rat Model.

Authors:  Soshi Hamada; Yu Mori; Yukari Shiwaku; Ryo Hamai; Kaori Tsuchiya; Kazuyoshi Baba; Itsuki Oizumi; Ryuichi Kanabuchi; Naohisa Miyatake; Toshimi Aizawa; Osamu Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Emerging Perspectives in Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Oral Surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Ceccarelli; Rossella Presta; Laura Benedetti; Maria Gabriella Cusella De Angelis; Saturnino Marco Lupi; Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.443

5.  Biodegradable mesoporous delivery system for biomineralization precursors.

Authors:  Hong-Ye Yang; Li-Na Niu; Jin-Long Sun; Xue-Qing Huang; Dan-Dan Pei; Cui Huang; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-01-25

6.  Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model.

Authors:  Liudmila Leppik; Han Zhihua; Sahba Mobini; Vishnu Thottakkattumana Parameswaran; Maria Eischen-Loges; Andrei Slavici; Judith Helbing; Lukas Pindur; Karla M C Oliveira; Mit B Bhavsar; Lukasz Hudak; Dirk Henrich; John H Barker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A UK-based pilot study of current surgical practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Elena Provaggi; Claudio Capelli; Julian J H Leong; Deepak M Kalaskar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Micropore-induced capillarity enhances bone distribution in vivo in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds.

Authors:  Laurence E Rustom; Thomas Boudou; Siyu Lou; Isabelle Pignot-Paintrand; Brett W Nemke; Yan Lu; Mark D Markel; Catherine Picart; Amy J Wagoner Johnson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Glycosaminoglycan content of a mineralized collagen scaffold promotes mesenchymal stem cell secretion of factors to modulate angiogenesis and monocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Vasiliki Kolliopoulos; Mai T Ngo; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Materialia (Oxf)       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Enhanced regeneration of large cortical bone defects with electrospun nanofibrous membranes and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Leyi Huang; Youzhi Cai; Honghua Hu; Peng Guo; Zengfeng Xin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.