C-L Lai 1 , H-Y Chan 1 , Y-J Pan 2 , C-H Chen 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A computer reminder system (CRS) may help psychiatrists follow guidelines and monitor patients at risk of metabolic syndrome. This study explores the effectiveness of a CRS for outpatients with schizophrenia. METHODS: The study data were collected from July 2004 to July 2008. A CRS was implemented in July 2006. The intervention group was patients taking either clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine with a CRS. The control group was patients taking either sulpiride or zotepine without a CRS. We defined a qualified patient visit (QPV) as a visit in which metabolic monitoring adhered to established guidelines when the patient visit was within 6 months of performing the recommended laboratory examinations. We compared the percentage difference in QPVs between the 2 study groups. RESULTS: The percentage of QPVs in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (OR=3.51, 95% CI=1.83~6.73, P=0.0002) after adjusting potential confounding factors. The intervention group was divided into a high metabolic risk (clozapine and olanzapine) subgroup and an intermediate metabolic risk (risperidone and quetiapine) subgroup and compared with the control group. The percentage of QPVs in the high risk subgroup was significantly higher than the intermediate risk subgroup (OR=4.27, 95% CI=2.71~6.75, p<0.0001) and control group (OR=6.99, 95% CI=3.48~14.07, p<0.0001). DISCUSSION: The percentage of QPVs in the intervention group was higher than the control group and the different metabolic risk of SGAs also influenced the performance of laboratory examinations. Further studies are needed to confirm the results of our studies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
INTRODUCTION: A computer reminder system (CRS ) may help psychiatrists follow guidelines and monitor patients at risk of metabolic syndrome . This study explores the effectiveness of a CRS for outpatients with schizophrenia . METHODS: The study data were collected from July 2004 to July 2008. A CRS was implemented in July 2006. The intervention group was patients taking either clozapine , olanzapine , risperidone , or quetiapine with a CRS . The control group was patients taking either sulpiride or zotepine without a CRS . We defined a qualified patient visit (QPV) as a visit in which metabolic monitoring adhered to established guidelines when the patient visit was within 6 months of performing the recommended laboratory examinations. We compared the percentage difference in QPVs between the 2 study groups. RESULTS: The percentage of QPVs in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (OR=3.51, 95% CI=1.83~6.73, P=0.0002) after adjusting potential confounding factors. The intervention group was divided into a high metabolic risk (clozapine and olanzapine ) subgroup and an intermediate metabolic risk (risperidone and quetiapine ) subgroup and compared with the control group. The percentage of QPVs in the high risk subgroup was significantly higher than the intermediate risk subgroup (OR=4.27, 95% CI=2.71~6.75, p<0.0001) and control group (OR=6.99, 95% CI=3.48~14.07, p<0.0001). DISCUSSION: The percentage of QPVs in the intervention group was higher than the control group and the different metabolic risk of SGAs also influenced the performance of laboratory examinations. Further studies are needed to confirm the results of our studies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2014
PMID: 25350604 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacopsychiatry ISSN: 0176-3679 Impact factor: 5.788