INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal catheter malfunction is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). It has a high failure rate with conservative management. Catheter replacement was historically the standard surgical treatment of choice. Nowadays, laparoscopy has been introduced as an alternative surgical modality to rescue the malfunctioning peritoneal catheter and also offers the possibility of replacement if indicated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical modalities. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for malfunctioning PD catheters (between January 2010 and April 2013) were analysed. The primary outcome included successful return to adequate PD. The secondary endpoint was length of catheter patency and the cause of catheter failure. RESULTS: A total of 32 cases were identified, of which 8 had open catheter replacement and 24 had a laparoscopic intervention. The overall median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. The success rate for laparoscopic surgery in terms of functioning catheter at 12 months was 62.5% but only 37.5% for open surgery. The mean length of catheter patency after laparoscopic intervention was 31.6 months compared with only 13.6 months for the open surgery group. The most common cause of catheter failure diagnosed during laparoscopic intervention was catheter migration (33.0%), followed by omental wrap and catheter blockage by fibrin/blood plug (25.0% each). Open surgery did not have any diagnostic potential. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is the treatment of choice for malfunctioning PD. Its proven benefit includes simultaneous identification of the aetiological cause of malfunction together with direct correction of this problem, thereby maximising outcome. It also allows for rapid recommencement of PD and avoidance of haemodialysis, saving cost and resources.
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal catheter malfunction is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). It has a high failure rate with conservative management. Catheter replacement was historically the standard surgical treatment of choice. Nowadays, laparoscopy has been introduced as an alternative surgical modality to rescue the malfunctioning peritoneal catheter and also offers the possibility of replacement if indicated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical modalities. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for malfunctioning PD catheters (between January 2010 and April 2013) were analysed. The primary outcome included successful return to adequate PD. The secondary endpoint was length of catheter patency and the cause of catheter failure. RESULTS: A total of 32 cases were identified, of which 8 had open catheter replacement and 24 had a laparoscopic intervention. The overall median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. The success rate for laparoscopic surgery in terms of functioning catheter at 12 months was 62.5% but only 37.5% for open surgery. The mean length of catheter patency after laparoscopic intervention was 31.6 months compared with only 13.6 months for the open surgery group. The most common cause of catheter failure diagnosed during laparoscopic intervention was catheter migration (33.0%), followed by omental wrap and catheter blockage by fibrin/blood plug (25.0% each). Open surgery did not have any diagnostic potential. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is the treatment of choice for malfunctioning PD. Its proven benefit includes simultaneous identification of the aetiological cause of malfunction together with direct correction of this problem, thereby maximising outcome. It also allows for rapid recommencement of PD and avoidance of haemodialysis, saving cost and resources.