Literature DB >> 25349989

Morphological variation in leaf dissection of Rheum palmatum complex (Polygonaceae).

Xu-Mei Wang1, Xiao-Qi Hou2, Yu-Qu Zhang3, Yan Li1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Rheum palmatum complex comprises all taxa within section Palmata in the genus Rheum, including R. officinale, R. palmatum, R. tanguticum, R. tanguticum var. liupanshanense and R. laciniatum. The identification of the taxa in section Palmata is based primarily on the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes; however, difficulties in species identification may arise from their significant variation. The aim of this study is to analyze the patterns of variation in leaf blade characteristics within and among populations through population-based sampling covering the entire distribution range of R. palmatum complex.
METHODS: Samples were taken from 2340 leaves from 780 individuals and 44 populations representing the four species, and the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobe were measured to yield a set of quantitative data. Furthermore, those data were statistically analyzed. IMPORTANT
FINDINGS: The statistical analysis showed that the degree of leaf blade dissection is continuous from lobed to parted, and the shape of the lobe is also continuous from broadly triangular to lanceolate both within and between populations. We suggested that taxa in section Palmata should be considered as one species. Based on the research on the R. palmatum complex, we considered that the quantitative characteristics were greatly influenced by the environment. Therefore, it is not reliable to delimitate the species according to the continuously quantitative vegetative characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25349989      PMCID: PMC4211699          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Species are fundamental units of systematic, ecological and evolutionary studies, and species delimitation has long been the focus of biologists' attention. The discovery and description of species is a major endeavor in the field of systematics. However, most species continue to be circumscribed based on morphological comparisons of museum specimens [1]. Published descriptions of new plant and animal species almost always include a herbarium specimen designated as a holotype and a list of diagnostic morphological features [1]. It may be insufficient to delimit species merely based on herbarium specimens because such specimens usually represent discontinuous sampling and only a handful of individuals from a limited number of localities or populations. Discontinuous sampling may fail to reveal the total geographic-morphological variations that occur within species, and such ignored variations may represent important characteristics that demonstrate the continuity within/among populations. Discontinuous sampling may also lead to the publication of many microspecies within a genus, and these species are often later considered as a species complex. Therefore, the delimitation of species and infraspecific taxa should be based on the study of natural populations [2]. For some genera of Chinese flora, microspecies were published by several authors based on the limited specimens collected from various localities by different collectors. Chinese botanists have devoted attention to some species complexes in recent decades [3]–[19], but only a small number of taxa have been investigated. Rheum palmatum complex comprises all taxa (i.e., R. officinale Baill., R. palmatum Linn., R. tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf., R. tanguticum var. liupanshanense C. Y. Cheng et T. C. Kao and R. laciniatum Prain) within Rheum Sect. Palmata. These taxa differ from other members of genus Rheum in the possession of palmately lobed leaf blades [20], and they are monophyletic [21]. The key characteristics within the species complex are the degree of leaf blade dissection and the lobe shape [20]. The blades of R. officinale and R. palmatum are lobed; the lobes of R. officinale are broadly triangular, and those of R. palmatum are narrowly triangular. The blades of R. tanguticum and R. laciniatum are parted, and the lobes are narrow and triangular-lanceolate. The difference between R. tanguticum and R. laciniatum is that the lobelets of the former are narrowly lanceolate, and those of the latter are linear. However, the transitional morphologies between species are often observed in both the herbarium specimens and the field individuals. Previous DNA-based studies have drawn conflicting conclusions, and the interspecific relationships remain to be resolved. Using AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers, Suo et al. [22] concluded that R. officinale and R. palmatum are mutually sisters and are together sisters with R. tanguticum based on samples from Sichuan and Gansu provinces. Using DNA sequences from the chloroplast gene matK, Yang et al. [23] reported that R. officinale and R. tanguticum are mutually sisters and are together sisters with R. palmatum based on samples from Qinghai, Sichuan, and Gansu provinces. Based on chloroplast DNA trnL-F sequences from samples from Chongqing and Qinghai provinces, Wang et al. [21] showed that the individuals of R. palmatum, R. officinale, and R. tanguticum are nested one with one another on the phylogenetic tree. Based on the nuclear ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequences from eight samples from Qinghai and Gansu provinces, Li et al. [24] indicated that the only sample of R. officinale in their study is sister with their seven samples of R. palmatum and R. tanguticum. According to our previous study, R. palmatum is the most widely distributed among the distribution of the species complex; the distribution of R. tanguticum overlaps with that of R. palmatum in northwestern distribution of the species complex, the distribution of R. officinale overlaps with that of R. palmatum in southeastern distribution of the species complex, and the distribution of R. officinale also overlaps with that of R. tanguticum [25]. R. laciniatum only inhabits the northern Sichuan province and embeds in the distribution areas of the other three species [20]. Based on their geographic distribution patterns and other evidence, we propose that these four species of Sect. Palmata might not be truly distinct species [25] and that this characterization might be attributable to the discontinuous sampling. The key characteristics (e.g., the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes) among the species in the complex are quantitative. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to analyze the pattern of variation of these characteristics within and among populations through population-based sampling covering the entire distribution range of R. palmatum complex.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

According to regulations of the People's Republic of China on the protection of wild plants, permits are required only for the species included on the list of state-protected plant species at the time of collection. Sect. Palmata is not on the list of state-protected plant species [26] (Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the protection of wild plants, http://www.people.com.cn/item/faguiku/zrzyf/U1020.html). Thus, no specific permits were required for the described field studies, and no harm was caused to the plants and their habitats.

Materials

Morphological analyses were conducted on 2340 leaf blades from 780 individuals from 44 populations in the field, representing all taxa within R. palmatum complex, i.e., R. officinale, R. palmatum, R. tanguticum, R. tanguticum var. liupanshanense, and R. laciniatum, from the entire distribution range of Sect. Palmata (Fig. 1, Table 1). Vouchers were deposited in the herbarium of Shaanxi Normal University (SNNU) (Xi'an, China).
Figure 1

Geographic distribution of the 44 studied populations of Rheum palmatum complex.

Table 1

Studied population information of R. palmatum complex.

PopulationLocalityAltitude (m)Longitude (°N)Latitude (°E)No. of individuals
Pop1Baotianman, Mt. Funiu, Neixiang County, Henan Province110033.486300111.91600011
Pop2Muyu, Mt. Shennongjia, Xingshan County, Hubei Province257531.450700110.1871505
Pop3Muyu, Mt. Shennongjia, Xingshan County, Hubei Province290831.446000110.26800017
Pop4Taibaimiao, Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province187833.423433108.53055020
Pop5Mt. Hualong, Baxian, Pingli County, Shaanxi Province291932.023217109.35832019
Pop6Daping, Mt. Jinfo, Nanchuan, Chongqing municipality141228.973567107.18372019
Pop7Yingshuiba, Guanba, Nanjiang County, Sichuan Pro vince180932.594472107.11300019
Pop8Hongxi Forest Farm, Meigu County, Sichuan Province362328.670717102.97235016
Pop9Sigou, Huanglong, Songpan County, Sichuan Province283132.797633103.58103020
Pop10Hailongtun, Gaoping, Zunyi County, Guizhou Province125227.812767106.8182808
Pop11Haba, Sanba, Xianggelila County, Yunnan Province399527.386983100.04590016
Pop12Haba, Sanba, Xianggelila County, Yunnan Province372727.395683100.03762016
Pop13Xiaozhongdian, Xianggelila County, Yunnan Province344127.58530699.84725020
Pop14Xiabansi, Mt. Taibai, Mei County, Shaanxi Province280733.969600107.79420020
Pop15Shuiwangping, Zhongchun, Qinshui County, Shanxi Province176635.418883111.95432020
Pop16Wengongmiao, Mt. Taibai, Mei County, Shaanxi Province342333.978183107.78017020
Pop17Doumugong, Mt. Taibai, Mei County, Shaanxi Province284134.038100107.71448019
Pop18Mingxingsi, Mt. Taibai, Mei County, Shaanxi Province285933.996600107.73163020
Pop19Nantianmen, Mt. Taibai, Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province265233.921400107.79000020
Pop20Mt. Guangtou, Fengyu, Chang'an County, Shaanxi Province257833.870000108.76000020
Pop21Haitanghe, Huangbaiyuan, Taibai County, Shaanxi Province240033.899467107.55798020
Pop22Longdonggou, Laoxiancheng, Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province265833.866367107.71360018
Pop23Heilingou, Mt. Qilian, Yongchang County, Gansu Province257538.166667101.4333309
Pop24Wangbalangyan, Mt. Qilian, Yongchang County, Gansu Province300638.105040101.86220010
Pop25Mt. Gongga, Luding coungty, Sichuan Province320429.569611101.98339019
Pop26Mt. Baoding, Baoding, Mao County, Sichuan Province310231.932000103.91540014
Pop27Naha, Sanlong, Mao County, Sichuan Province233731.806583103.5329319
Pop28Aji, Dagai, Xinlong County, Sichuan Province376031.298767100.0513320
Pop29Fenghe, Xiaohe, Songpan County, Sichuan Province274932.601833104.1624220
Pop30Miyaluo, Li County, Sichuan Province357931.772139102.7573320
Pop31Zhonggu, Yala, Kangding County, Sichuan Province369230.246361101.8638920
Pop32Mt. Balang, Wolong, Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province359030.884139102.9656920
Pop33Luoza, Rendui, Nanmulin County, Tibet Zang Autonomous Region449830.13125089.09170020
Pop34Tuoba, Changdu County, Tibet Zang Autonomous Region441831.35473397.69091720
Pop35Qingnidong, Jiangda County, Tibet Zang Autonomous Region400031.37611197.90555618
Pop36Qiaotan, Xianmi, Menyuan County, Qinghai Province314837.192483101.99890018
Pop37Qiujiaba, Tielou, Wen County, Gansu Province323432.926556104.28711019
Pop38Jimai, Dari County, Qinghai Province394733.81918399.71115020
Pop39Longwangmiaogou, Mt. Liupan, Jingyuan County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region222435.666667106.21667013
Pop40Yaogou, Huanglong, Songpan County, Sichuan Province359732.797733103.87448019
Pop41Maixiu Forest Farm, Zeku County, Qinghai Province334935.314533101.93120020
Pop42Mt. Guanjiao, Xinyuan, Tianjun County, Qinghai Province369337.09350098.85663320
Pop43Duocigou, Lajia, Jungong, Maqin County, Qinghai Province337334.615917100.56617020
Pop44Baishagou, Wanglang Reserve, Pingwu County, Sichuan Province319332.873900104.05017019

Measurement and analysis of leaf blade characteristics

The degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes were measured. Because the two basal-most leaves of all investigated individuals are entire or waved, the third, fourth and fifth leaves from the bottom of the stem were measured in each individual. The mean value was obtained from three leaves for each individual. The leaf blades of the species complex are five-palmate lobed with five main veins, and the five lobes and veins were accordingly named the central, lateral and basal lobes and veins, respectively, and the clefts between the central and lateral and the lateral and basal lobes were called the lateral and basal clefts, respectively (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

The measurement of a leaf blade of Rheum palmatum complex.

A typical leaf form of No. 5 individual of Pop21.

The measurement of a leaf blade of Rheum palmatum complex.

A typical leaf form of No. 5 individual of Pop21. To characterize the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes, the following parameters were measured on the leaf blade: AB, the length of the central vein, to represent the length of leaf blade; AC, from the connection point of the blade and petiole to the lowest point of the sinus between the central and lateral lobes, to represent the depth of the lateral cleft; CD, the distance between the two lowest points of the sinus of the two lateral clefts, to represent the width of the central lobe; and BE, the length of the central vein from the leaf blade apex (B) to CD, to represent the length of the central lobe (Fig. 2). To intuitively indicate the changes in the leaf lobe width and the leaf cleft depth, the above lines (i.e., parameters) were linked to form two triangles, ABC and BCE. In triangle ABC, if the length of the central vein (AB) is regarded as a unit of length, then the values of AC/AB vary with the depth of the leaf cleft. A smaller AC/AB value indicates that the leaf cleft is deeper (i.e., parted), whereas a larger AC/AB value shows that the leaf cleft is shallower (i.e., lobed). Likewise, if BE, the height of triangle BCD, is regarded as a unit of length, then the values of CD/BE vary with the width of the leaf lobe. A smaller CD/BE value indicates that the leaf lobe is narrower (i.e., lanceolate), whereas a larger CD/BE value shows that the leaf lobe is wider (i.e., broadly triangular). Therefore, the analyses of inter-population and intra-population variations were conducted at the individual and population levels based on the values of AC/AB and CD/BE. Variation among the populations can be observed from the scatter diagram comparing the two indices of leaf lobes and from the histogram indicating the number of individuals in different ranges of leaf cleft indices. Variation within the populations can be obtained from the histogram indicating the range of variation of leaf cleft indices in different individuals. Using the parameters measured in the field, the maximum and minimum values of AC/AB and CD/BE were obtained at the individual and population levels, and the difference between the maximum and minimum values for each parameter were then assessed. Because the scatter diagram showed that the AC/AB and CD/BE values among different populations were continuous within taxa of R. palmatum complex, the differences between the maximum and minimum values of AC/AB or CD/BE were divided into three equal intervals, and each interval corresponded theoretically to a morphological variation range of leaf blade. Thus, each morphological variation range of leaf blade was obtained. All measurements were obtained using a rule precise to 0.1 cm. The correlation analysis among the morphological parameters and the correlation analysis of these morphological parameters with environmental factors were performed with the statistical software SPSS 17.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Leaf variations among populations

The scatter diagram showed that the values of both AC/AB and CD/BE were continuous at the individual (Fig. 3A) and population (Fig. 3B) levels and that neither distinct individuals nor populations could be clearly grouped. The two indices are significantly correlated (r = 0.949, P<0.01) (Table 2). If a leaf has a larger AC/AB value, then it must have a larger CD/BE value, indicating that the blade is lobed with broadly triangular lobes; in contrast, if a leaf has a smaller AC/AB value, then it must have a smaller CD/BE value, indicating that the blade is parted with lanceolate lobes. The number of individuals of different AC/AB values (Fig. 4A) showed a near-normal distribution, and the AC/AB values are not disconnected. In other words, some individuals in the R. palmatum complex possessed deeper leaf divisions, but most individuals were characterized by moderate leaf divisions. Despite also showing a continuous distribution, the pattern of CD/BE values (Fig. 4B) differed slightly from that of AC/AB values (Fig. 4A). Most individuals had smaller CD/BE values (<1.000).
Figure 3

The scatter diagrams of AC/AB and CD/BE at the individual (A) and population (B) levels.

Table 2

Correlation coefficients among the leaf morphological traits and the environmental factors of R. palmatum complex.

CD/BEAC/AB
AC/AB0.949**
Altitude−0.331* −0.322*
Latitude−0.622** −0.562**
Longitude0.2940.278

**, *Correlation is significant at 1% and 5% levels of probability, respectively.

Figure 4

The numbers of individuals with different AC/AB (A) and CD/BE (B) values among the studied populations.

**, *Correlation is significant at 1% and 5% levels of probability, respectively.

Leaf variations within populations

The AC/AB values ranged from 0.0970 to 0.8485 at the individual level in the R. palmatum complex, and the difference between the maximum and minimum values is 0.7515 (Tables 3, 4). As shown in the scatter diagram (Fig. 3), both AC/AB and CD/BE values were continuous in all taxa of the R. palmatum complex, which displayed three gradient-like ranges in the leaf morphology, and the median value of each range may represent a leaf blade type, i.e., lobed and broad triangular for R. officinale, lobed and triangular for R. palmatum, and parted and lanceolate for R. tanguticum and laciniatum. Therefore, the range of AC/AB values was divided into three equal intervals. In other words, the theoretical maximum range of variation in AC/AB values was 0.2505 for each of the three morphological ranges, and the three variation ranges were 0.0970–0.3475, 0.3476–0.5980 and 0.5981–0.8485 (Tables 3, 4; Fig. 5A). Likewise, the CD/BE values ranged from 0.0873 to 2.0323 at the individual level, and the three variation ranges were 0.0873–0.7356, 0.7357–1.3839 and 1.3840–2.0323 (Tables 3, 4; Fig. 5B).
Table 3

Statistical parameters of the leaf blades of R. palmatum complex for 780 individuals of 44 populations.

IndividualsAC/ABCD/BEIndividualsAC/ABCD/BEIndividualsAC/ABCD/BEIndividualsAC/ABCD/BEIndividualsAC/ABCD/BE
Pop1-1 0.60661.4000Pop1-20.66671.7500Pop1-30.50980.8462Pop1-40.59461.2667Pop1-50.64711.1333
Pop1-60.68291.6667Pop1-70.84851.4286Pop1-80.63641.6667Pop1-90.57140.8125Pop1-100.70591.4211
Pop1-110.58750.8235
Pop2-1 0.63041.4464Pop2-20.62641.5167Pop2-30.64381.3082Pop2-40.55640.9820Pop2-50.67391.2987
Pop3-1 0.71671.6957Pop3-20.68601.4865Pop3-30.66671.5758Pop3-40.66231.4167Pop3-50.73331.5294
Pop3-60.76681.8235Pop3-70.62911.4714Pop3-80.56940.9931Pop3-90.69361.6383Pop3-100.69571.6190
Pop3-110.56931.0221Pop3-120.69401.4068Pop3-130.71431.4884Pop3-140.62331.1961Pop3-150.63751.2679
Pop3-160.66521.4563Pop3-170.61181.1579
Pop4-1 0.54671.0000Pop4-20.54690.8140Pop4-30.66041.4167Pop4-40.71091.4286Pop4-50.50000.8000
Pop4-60.53180.7778Pop4-70.56210.9459Pop4-80.50430.7377Pop4-90.56970.9744Pop4-100.52360.7200
Pop4-110.49460.7245Pop4-120.72081.5185Pop4-130.65881.2973Pop4-140.69931.3704Pop4-150.70891.3448
Pop4-160.65521.1778Pop4-170.70371.1667Pop4-180.61360.9756Pop4-190.50540.7647Pop4-200.65361.1333
Pop5-1 0.63891.3876Pop5-20.64711.2981Pop5-30.64081.1180Pop5-40.58711.0185Pop5-50.65381.1414
Pop5-60.59751.3250Pop5-70.71131.7297Pop5-80.70591.6237Pop5-90.60531.1233Pop5-100.51420.9550
Pop5-110.62751.6480Pop5-120.68331.4716Pop5-130.61631.2500Pop5-140.71051.4127Pop5-150.70751.4545
Pop5-160.49150.8563Pop5-170.73871.3617Pop5-180.59041.2222Pop5-190.55560.9120
Pop6-1 0.66281.2329Pop6-20.68181.2000Pop6-30.68931.4211Pop6-40.70701.1750Pop6-50.67571.3571
Pop6-60.70371.5556Pop6-70.69901.4286Pop6-80.71191.4091Pop6-90.72971.7910Pop6-100.70271.6333
Pop6-110.73641.5476Pop6-120.69321.2958Pop6-130.72571.5873Pop6-140.65631.4545Pop6-150.73331.8261
Pop6-160.66051.2527Pop6-170.72621.6207Pop6-180.70591.4583Pop6-190.70951.6269
Pop7-1 0.67231.1038Pop7-20.59670.9697Pop7-30.58000.8339Pop7-40.58251.1379Pop7-50.58680.9150
Pop7-60.52940.8894Pop7-70.58420.9901Pop7-80.57620.9466Pop7-90.67030.9888Pop7-100.61420.8957
Pop7-110.63180.7579Pop7-120.57480.8496Pop7-130.57290.8706Pop7-140.59620.9381Pop7-150.64061.0369
Pop7-160.65451.4300Pop7-170.61050.9020Pop7-180.59280.9836Pop7-190.67221.0456
Pop8-1 0.60471.3061Pop8-20.66671.0000Pop8-30.58140.8250Pop8-40.49651.0441Pop8-50.58591.0169
Pop8-60.57411.0000Pop8-70.58821.1212Pop8-80.52630.6250Pop8-90.61191.1481Pop8-100.54960.9286
Pop8-110.61671.2308Pop8-120.56250.9375Pop8-130.49180.7000Pop8-140.66671.2000Pop8-150.72921.6471
Pop8-160.61761.1875
Pop9-1 0.58261.0862Pop9-20.60331.0484Pop9-30.56920.9870Pop9-40.51820.8281Pop9-50.69321.2826
Pop9-60.53061.3200Pop9-70.58441.0417Pop9-80.72091.0784Pop9-90.56460.7848Pop9-100.52500.8222
Pop9-110.53970.9091Pop9-120.58651.0612Pop9-130.58470.9355Pop9-140.63330.9600Pop9-150.55880.8462
Pop9-160.57630.9538Pop9-170.59801.0000Pop9-180.64581.2174Pop9-190.52000.8780Pop9-200.68540.9815
Pop10-1 0.77111.6552Pop10-20.71031.6604Pop10-30.71431.6667Pop10-40.70881.7813Pop10-50.74501.5472
Pop10-60.64681.3805Pop10-70.65381.4000Pop10-80.67741.2593
Pop11-1 0.63271.2985Pop11-20.56461.1127Pop11-30.61311.2500Pop11-40.63411.3393Pop11-50.63471.1912
Pop11-60.68281.4098Pop11-70.66181.2698Pop11-80.67881.3714Pop11-90.56791.1111Pop11-100.69091.5000
Pop11-110.64291.2097Pop11-120.64671.2647Pop11-130.62451.1509Pop11-140.56040.9474Pop11-150.68241.4324
Pop11-160.58901.1500
Pop12-1 0.69411.4468Pop12-20.68941.3902Pop12-30.74431.5114Pop12-40.66511.3483Pop12-50.68131.5333
Pop12-60.66920.9732Pop12-70.64321.3263Pop12-80.63161.2268Pop12-90.67871.5682Pop12-100.69231.5616
Pop12-110.71142.0000Pop12-120.65761.4945Pop12-130.71531.7115Pop12-140.68991.5690Pop12-150.67541.6321
Pop12-160.67251.5839
Pop13-1 0.60870.9674Pop13-20.60401.0047Pop13-30.59520.9844Pop13-40.57941.1769Pop13-50.53991.1153
Pop13-60.58170.9572Pop13-70.58541.1227Pop13-80.73041.0870Pop13-90.75441.1620Pop13-100.61481.3157
Pop13-110.76551.4253Pop13-120.59251.2140Pop13-130.62431.1141Pop13-140.74871.2049Pop13-150.56711.0698
Pop13-160.69611.3349Pop13-170.65071.1781Pop13-180.68111.2939Pop13-190.62411.1528Pop13-200.60121.1804
Pop14-1 0.53760.8889Pop14-20.60320.9751Pop14-30.55421.0000Pop14-40.62651.1995Pop14-50.44120.6942
Pop14-60.47840.7385Pop14-70.64991.5506Pop14-80.62590.9111Pop14-90.52700.6845Pop14-100.55420.8025
Pop14-110.49950.7813Pop14-120.55030.8108Pop14-130.51040.8067Pop14-140.57691.1125Pop14-150.47480.6068
Pop14-160.62891.1799Pop14-170.64881.4507Pop14-180.46300.6828Pop14-190.47160.5813Pop14-200.60961.1923
Pop15-1 0.38890.5738Pop15-20.40790.6122Pop15-30.39760.5345Pop15-40.34620.4444Pop15-50.40000.5439
Pop15-60.42860.6230Pop15-70.46460.7500Pop15-80.51920.7458Pop15-90.47830.6610Pop15-100.53060.9643
Pop15-110.62791.2632Pop15-120.56250.8261Pop15-130.56820.9545Pop15-140.55360.8889Pop15-150.37630.5873
Pop15-160.42420.5738Pop15-170.34570.5088Pop15-180.36460.5417Pop15-190.38820.5357Pop15-200.46840.6122
Pop16-1 0.38140.5469Pop16-20.46220.6004Pop16-30.53520.8453Pop16-40.34500.4778Pop16-50.33960.4637
Pop16-60.54100.7904Pop16-70.43940.6377Pop16-80.38980.6591Pop16-90.42340.6148Pop16-100.50910.7913
Pop16-110.45470.8005Pop16-120.53710.7980Pop16-130.35480.4710Pop16-140.49350.6659Pop16-150.40820.5000
Pop16-160.43460.6242Pop16-170.35510.4927Pop16-180.47060.6589Pop16-190.49080.7229Pop16-200.48040.7086
Pop17-1 0.60131.0088Pop17-20.65991.4526Pop17-30.55710.8846Pop17-40.53230.8407Pop17-50.43210.5432
Pop17-60.39840.6220Pop17-70.42390.5960Pop17-80.41390.5435Pop17-90.38090.4992Pop17-100.51070.7802
Pop17-110.40140.4707Pop17-120.59521.2143Pop17-130.69201.3939Pop17-140.66851.3990Pop17-150.59980.9600
Pop17-160.51800.8438Pop17-170.53880.9160Pop17-180.41030.5338Pop17-190.55940.8755
Pop18-1 0.44510.6553Pop18-20.45330.6225Pop18-30.45220.6033Pop18-40.57331.0313Pop18-50.48490.7420
Pop18-60.60070.9953Pop18-70.66051.4793Pop18-80.46530.7536Pop18-90.56360.9617Pop18-100.50570.8798
Pop18-110.53140.7190Pop18-120.46080.7713Pop18-130.52770.8958Pop18-140.56050.9245Pop18-150.57990.9953
Pop18-160.42410.5697Pop18-170.45530.7068Pop18-180.47250.6842Pop18-190.49610.8522Pop18-200.51580.8676
Pop19-1 0.39310.6238Pop19-20.42820.6410Pop19-30.44160.6949Pop19-40.27650.3478Pop19-50.46910.7329
Pop19-60.32240.3974Pop19-70.43860.6726Pop19-80.33610.4138Pop19-90.43980.6364Pop19-100.39610.5458
Pop19-110.38220.4828Pop19-120.39820.5711Pop19-130.53270.8772Pop19-140.53680.8964Pop19-150.38680.5224
Pop19-160.35020.5772Pop19-170.32420.4714Pop19-180.38040.4747Pop19-190.31560.4000Pop19-200.44580.5610
Pop20-1 0.52740.7660Pop20-20.66800.9510Pop20-30.50180.9000Pop20-40.64041.3136Pop20-50.57810.9094
Pop20-60.58210.8150Pop20-70.48740.8562Pop20-80.60090.9831Pop20-90.57300.8781Pop20-100.58780.9916
Pop20-110.59770.9526Pop20-120.52400.9569Pop20-130.55381.1099Pop20-140.55971.0125Pop20-150.54340.9389
Pop20-160.52070.6946Pop20-170.64580.9169Pop20-180.62501.1521Pop20-190.51950.8646Pop20-200.52140.8158
Pop21-1 0.36270.4171Pop21-20.43330.5912Pop21-30.50670.8031Pop21-40.39930.4712Pop21-50.51650.7298
Pop21-60.33270.3852Pop21-70.27170.2908Pop21-80.37280.3997Pop21-90.52220.7604Pop21-100.39870.4831
Pop21-110.44670.5474Pop21-120.52570.8476Pop21-130.37160.4966Pop21-140.33770.4860Pop21-150.44390.7006
Pop21-160.27010.3345Pop21-170.41370.5583Pop21-180.43430.6318Pop21-190.36560.3460Pop21-200.31000.3291
Pop22-1 0.48580.7530Pop22-20.45410.6988Pop22-30.54050.7978Pop22-40.71790.5276Pop22-50.49690.7473
Pop22-60.65441.2754Pop22-70.55040.8836Pop22-80.54370.9792Pop22-90.39710.6998Pop22-100.54640.8679
Pop22-110.57810.9524Pop22-120.34080.4553Pop22-130.50790.7532Pop22-140.38200.4676Pop22-150.40500.7940
Pop22-160.66111.4822Pop22-170.53450.8478Pop22-180.66511.2556
Pop23-1 0.45330.5238Pop23-20.42860.4706Pop23-30.53850.4118Pop23-40.55560.7692Pop23-50.48280.6250
Pop23-60.47370.6000Pop23-70.44680.5185Pop23-80.50000.6389Pop23-90.59300.8571
Pop24-1 0.48000.7000Pop24-20.55000.8667Pop24-30.51720.8667Pop24-40.57580.9412Pop24-50.51720.8065
Pop24-60.45830.5714Pop24-70.50000.8182Pop24-80.51430.7000Pop24-90.42110.5833Pop24-100.61541.3333
Pop25-1 0.60340.9737Pop25-20.54700.9710Pop25-30.53590.9082Pop25-40.61831.1411Pop25-50.64291.2733
Pop25-60.63621.0270Pop25-70.61461.1781Pop25-80.57510.9390Pop25-90.54440.9618Pop25-100.59410.9477
Pop25-110.54250.9648Pop25-120.56850.8999Pop25-130.61121.0819Pop25-140.60850.9163Pop25-150.64831.1639
Pop25-160.60300.8975Pop25-170.52120.8370Pop25-180.52400.8078Pop25-190.48940.8484
Pop26-1 0.52420.8889Pop26-20.52750.9140Pop26-30.49300.7236Pop26-40.56570.8550Pop26-50.56390.8941
Pop26-60.52170.8776Pop26-70.54320.9474Pop26-80.46060.6875Pop26-90.49560.9630Pop26-100.50620.6279
Pop26-110.68571.4286Pop26-120.44000.6267Pop26-130.48990.7841Pop26-140.50880.7419
Pop27-1 0.28650.3684Pop27-20.31510.4182Pop27-30.29630.3704Pop27-40.33900.5119Pop27-50.40520.6923
Pop27-60.30230.4545Pop27-70.46850.8649Pop27-80.41000.6970Pop27-90.35790.6056Pop27-100.33090.4468
Pop27-110.37780.5806Pop27-120.30950.3967Pop27-130.43480.6250Pop27-140.37500.5229Pop27-150.35290.5000
Pop27-160.48721.0204Pop27-170.36140.5263Pop27-180.42310.6957Pop27-190.42170.6286
Pop28-1 0.50850.7818Pop28-20.41520.4962Pop28-30.45290.5482Pop28-40.44260.6111Pop28-50.43690.5870
Pop28-60.49260.6281Pop28-70.43500.5413Pop28-80.39270.5164Pop28-90.47970.5198Pop28-100.45300.7202
Pop28-110.47790.7089Pop28-120.43780.5719Pop28-130.43240.4985Pop28-140.56070.6633Pop28-150.47970.5950
Pop28-160.41210.5170Pop28-170.38290.5333Pop28-180.40660.4808Pop28-190.43980.4722Pop28-200.50270.7289
Pop29-1 0.60801.0556Pop29-20.56721.0000Pop29-30.46670.7925Pop29-40.53230.8824Pop29-50.41050.6441
Pop29-60.56481.0000Pop29-70.55261.0000Pop29-80.54410.9189Pop29-90.51721.2273Pop29-100.54120.9302
Pop29-110.50420.8358Pop29-120.58140.9756Pop29-130.53620.8919Pop29-140.46150.6400Pop29-150.47540.7042
Pop29-160.58820.7627Pop29-170.62960.8889Pop29-180.58201.1935Pop29-190.60271.2353Pop29-200.59170.9180
Pop30-1 0.47360.6461Pop30-20.49530.5630Pop30-30.50190.7684Pop30-40.52890.6128Pop30-50.53100.6104
Pop30-60.55870.6894Pop30-70.46280.5406Pop30-80.48420.4797Pop30-90.49050.7481Pop30-100.52630.5781
Pop30-110.46630.6575Pop30-120.48060.7748Pop30-130.50600.7000Pop30-140.43770.5438Pop30-150.44170.5484
Pop30-160.52600.6603Pop30-170.50760.7268Pop30-180.52270.7441Pop30-190.46030.7401Pop30-200.45600.5548
Pop31-1 0.68581.4724Pop31-20.67141.0251Pop31-30.63761.0766Pop31-40.57900.8497Pop31-50.54801.0144
Pop31-60.53400.9273Pop31-70.52760.7291Pop31-80.54710.7806Pop31-90.57720.8392Pop31-100.60420.9004
Pop31-110.55051.0978Pop31-120.53530.8589Pop31-130.53930.7059Pop31-140.55530.8408Pop31-150.54220.8414
Pop31-160.51290.8275Pop31-170.51510.6702Pop31-180.50360.7692Pop31-190.56550.8347Pop31-200.54060.8559
Pop32-1 0.56850.6992Pop32-20.46770.6766Pop32-30.43120.5224Pop32-40.47910.7425Pop32-50.47820.8069
Pop32-60.50400.7541Pop32-70.50910.7459Pop32-80.56290.7058Pop32-90.59190.8043Pop32-100.51790.8696
Pop32-110.52600.7615Pop32-120.52690.7686Pop32-130.52170.8264Pop32-140.54750.7893Pop32-150.53350.8109
Pop32-160.55431.0032Pop32-170.56350.8307Pop32-180.53710.6708Pop32-190.59150.7124Pop32-200.55280.8114
Pop33-1 0.42130.6845Pop33-20.51260.6711Pop33-30.51400.9046Pop33-40.49250.7237Pop33-50.45410.7895
Pop33-60.48590.8937Pop33-70.51460.9767Pop33-80.55030.9861Pop33-90.58571.0133Pop33-100.47540.8053
Pop33-110.39750.6145Pop33-120.38230.6718Pop33-130.55180.6155Pop33-140.52240.8220Pop33-150.50440.8027
Pop33-160.50790.8700Pop33-170.51330.8020Pop33-180.50590.8874Pop33-190.51020.9526Pop33-200.49380.9208
Pop34-1 0.32240.4575Pop34-20.35410.4555Pop34-30.29760.3693Pop34-40.32890.3958Pop34-50.40800.5000
Pop34-60.49330.7784Pop34-70.37780.5160Pop34-80.41860.5991Pop34-90.40190.2861Pop34-100.32630.4689
Pop34-110.47390.5851Pop34-120.42940.6271Pop34-130.33500.3380Pop34-140.39480.4766Pop34-150.56770.7281
Pop34-160.49600.7429Pop34-170.46110.5074Pop34-180.37450.4040Pop34-190.34330.4818Pop34-200.42140.5109
Pop35-1 0.43040.7043Pop35-20.40540.5997Pop35-30.46170.6545Pop35-40.49610.5738Pop35-50.41730.5775
Pop35-60.38660.4751Pop35-70.41100.5379Pop35-80.33940.3996Pop35-90.55540.7948Pop35-100.36710.3959
Pop35-110.40900.5737Pop35-120.39250.5962Pop35-130.41080.4799Pop35-140.43790.5813Pop35-150.40470.4667
Pop35-160.43420.5974Pop35-170.38600.5914Pop35-180.37520.5096
Pop36-1 0.40580.4948Pop36-20.29800.4000Pop36-30.35360.3552Pop36-40.35970.4140Pop36-50.36670.5525
Pop36-60.43700.6119Pop36-70.36700.4855Pop36-80.32440.4110Pop36-90.41740.4751Pop36-100.42380.5659
Pop36-110.37850.4365Pop36-120.35000.5015Pop36-130.37520.5512Pop36-140.48410.6113Pop36-150.45380.6655
Pop36-160.51200.7607Pop36-170.32840.4199Pop36-180.39500.6037
Pop37-1 0.36590.4054Pop37-20.37940.4474Pop37-30.31140.3205Pop37-40.32520.3570Pop37-50.30890.2772
Pop37-60.27470.2671Pop37-70.26630.3306Pop37-80.31620.3078Pop37-90.38020.2836Pop37-100.37240.3187
Pop37-110.33990.3598Pop37-120.40110.5238Pop37-130.35270.3627Pop37-140.33120.3626Pop37-150.23250.3199
Pop37-160.46130.6552Pop37-170.30130.3139Pop37-180.32890.3837Pop37-190.32980.3396
Pop38-1 0.37650.6714Pop38-20.30470.3360Pop38-30.29630.3835Pop38-40.42500.5994Pop38-50.40650.5893
Pop38-60.29900.4850Pop38-70.27990.4111Pop38-80.39960.5658Pop38-90.25780.3338Pop38-100.25040.3081
Pop38-110.33890.5410Pop38-120.30350.4327Pop38-130.35600.4506Pop38-140.32420.4143Pop38-150.40960.3925
Pop38-160.37390.5045Pop38-170.27730.5385Pop38-180.46260.6849Pop38-190.27750.3676Pop38-200.28970.3753
Pop39-1 0.25000.3077Pop39-20.30000.3636Pop39-30.13730.1739Pop39-40.14290.1316Pop39-50.19230.0909
Pop39-60.22410.2727Pop39-70.37840.5000Pop39-80.18370.2051Pop39-90.32560.3438Pop39-100.13890.1724
Pop39-110.20000.1765Pop39-120.17190.1724Pop39-130.23810.3125
Pop40-1 0.47830.3000Pop40-20.24210.3026Pop40-30.19720.2522Pop40-40.43370.2982Pop40-50.26220.2636
Pop40-60.43800.4643Pop40-70.28160.3269Pop40-80.21500.2414Pop40-90.23890.2556Pop40-100.27270.2605
Pop40-110.20920.2195Pop40-120.21260.2057Pop40-130.24820.2547Pop40-140.22840.2358Pop40-150.22120.3316
Pop40-160.24090.2074Pop40-170.27230.3182Pop40-180.25950.2381Pop40-190.24640.1982
Pop41-1 0.18340.2612Pop41-20.11790.1441Pop41-30.12340.1574Pop41-40.21920.2443Pop41-50.17290.2112
Pop41-60.22310.2261Pop41-70.20770.2247Pop41-80.13280.1323Pop41-90.09700.0873Pop41-100.20930.2345
Pop41-110.12680.1228Pop41-120.14680.1358Pop41-130.09920.0996Pop41-140.14660.1620Pop41-150.17720.1858
Pop41-160.21330.1837Pop41-170.17340.1742Pop41-180.19700.1994Pop41-190.17210.2021Pop41-200.17670.2068
Pop42-1 0.30870.4063Pop42-20.23570.1892Pop42-30.27740.3087Pop42-40.30850.2975Pop42-50.27830.2718
Pop42-60.25360.2363Pop42-70.27330.2476Pop42-80.23320.1938Pop42-90.14420.1777Pop42-100.18260.2082
Pop42-110.32160.3885Pop42-120.24780.2706Pop42-130.31480.3706Pop42-140.27350.2828Pop42-150.23450.2617
Pop42-160.24060.2553Pop42-170.21710.2877Pop42-180.26000.2844Pop42-190.26120.2589Pop42-200.26920.2478
Pop43-1 0.26980.2570Pop43-20.26000.2505Pop43-30.19940.2451Pop43-40.22150.2012Pop43-50.18850.2172
Pop43-60.18550.1909Pop43-70.20640.2203Pop43-80.27580.2970Pop43-90.19580.2202Pop43-100.18270.2792
Pop43-110.17440.2278Pop43-120.17530.2287Pop43-130.18650.1915Pop43-140.18670.2062Pop43-150.22540.2940
Pop43-160.22830.2510Pop43-170.24910.2385Pop43-180.25890.2482Pop43-190.24940.2926Pop43-200.22240.2578
Pop44-1 0.23210.2803Pop44-20.22940.4205Pop44-30.30510.4630Pop44-40.25440.2373Pop44-50.26870.2500
Pop44-60.30530.3478Pop44-70.27780.3333Pop44-80.23170.2154Pop44-90.33650.3425Pop44-100.21610.1915
Pop44-110.26060.2568Pop44-120.24810.2100Pop44-130.33640.2651Pop44-140.25890.2898Pop44-150.24440.2736
Pop44-160.37230.3731Pop44-170.26790.1705Pop44-180.28300.2791Pop44-190.21150.2375
Table 4

The variation ranges of AC/AB and CD/BE.

ValuesAC/ABCD/BETheoretical species
Maximum0.84852.0323
Minimum0.09700.0873
Difference0.75151.9450
Individual levelThree-level interval0.25050.6483
The first range0.0970–0.34750.0873–0.7356 R. officinale
Variation rangeThe second range0.3476–0.59800.7357–1.3839 R. palmatum
The third range0.5981–0.84851.3840–2.0323 R. tanguticum, R. laciniatum
Maximum0.72711.6383
Minimum0.16580.1798
Difference0.56131.4585
Population levelThree-level interval0.18710.4862
The first range0.1658–0.35290.1798–0.6660 R. officinale
Variation rangeThe second range0.3530–0.54000.6661–1.1522 R. palmatum
The third range0.5401–0.72711.1523–1.6383 R. tanguticum, R. laciniatum
Figure 5

Range of variation of AC/AB (A) and CD/BE (B) values within the studied populations.

The AC/AB values ranged from 0.1658 to 0.7271 at the population level in the R. palmatum complex (Table 4), and the difference between the maximum and minimum values was 0.5613. The difference of AC/AB values was divided into three equal intervals. In other words, the theoretical maximum variation range of AC/AB values was 0.1871 for each of the three morphological ranges, and the three variation ranges were 0.1658–0.3529, 0.3530–0.5400 and 0.5401–0.7271. These three ranges should theoretically correspond to the depth of the blade division of R. officinale, R. palmatum and R. tanguticum, respectively. Similarly, the CD/BE values ranged from 0.1798 to 1.6383 at the population level (Table 4), and the difference between the maximum and minimum values was 1.4585. The difference of the CD/BE value was also divided into three equal intervals. In other words, the theoretical maximum variation range of CD/BE values was 0.4862 for each of the three morphological ranges, and the three variation ranges were 0.1798–0.6660, 0.6661–1.1522 and 1.1523–1.6383. Based on the mean AC/AB and CD/BE values at the population level, the minimum variation of AC/AB and CD/BE values occurred in populations Pop37-Pop44, and these populations possessed deeper clefts and narrower lobes, corresponding to R. tanguticum (including its variety) and R. laciniatum. For the maximum and the moderate variation ranges, Pop1-Pop6 and Pop10-Pop13 were included in the maximum variation range that corresponded with R. officinale both for the AC/AB value and for the CD/BE value, but Pop7 and Pop8 were exceptions; seventeen populations, i.e., Pop 15-Pop19, Pop21-Pop24, Pop26-Pop28, Pop30 and Pop33-Pop36, were within the moderate variation range, which corresponded to R. palmatum. However, six populations, Pop9, Pop14, Pop20, Pop25, Pop29 and Pop31, were within the moderate variation range based on the AC/AB value but belonged to the maximum variation range for the CD/BE value. Pop7 and Pop8 differed from the above populations, residing within the maximum variation range of the AC/AB value; however, these two populations were within the moderate variation range and the maximum variation range of CD/BE values, respectively. These results indicate that these eight populations, Pop7, Pop8, Pop9, Pop14, Pop20, Pop25, Pop29 and Pop31, are the transitional forms between R. officinale and R. palmatum. The two indices of the leaf blade cleft also differed greatly among the different individuals within populations, and the differences between populations were also not identical (Table 5; Fig. 3). The difference in the AC/AB values varied from 0.0959 to 0.3771, among which the differences for nine populations were larger than the trisection of the difference between the maximum and minimum of AC/AB values (0.2505). The population with the smallest difference was Pop43, followed by Pop41, and that with the largest difference was Pop22, followed by Pop12. The difference in the CD/BE values varied from 0.1061 to 1.0269, among which the differences for 18 populations were larger than the trisection of the difference between the maximum and minimum of the CD/BE values (0.6483). The population with the smallest difference was Pop6, followed by Pop43, and that with the largest difference was Pop22, followed by Pop16. The difference had no correlation with the population size.
Table 5

AC/AB and CD/BE value at population level.

PopulationAC/ABCD/BE
MeanMaximumMinimumDifferenceMeanMaximumMinimumDifference
Pop10.64160.84850.50980.33871.29231.75000.82350.9265
Pop20.62620.67390.55640.11751.31041.51670.98200.5347
Pop30.66680.76680.56930.19751.42621.82350.99310.8304
Pop40.60350.72080.49460.22621.05441.51850.72000.7985
Pop50.62380.73870.49150.24721.27941.72970.85630.8734
Pop60.70310.75220.65630.09591.49502.02701.17500.852
Pop70.60730.67230.52940.14290.97291.43000.75790.6721
Pop80.59190.72920.49180.23741.50741.64710.62501.0221
Pop90.59100.72090.51820.20271.00111.32000.78480.5352
Pop100.72710.83330.64680.18651.63832.03231.25930.773
Pop110.63170.69090.56040.13051.25061.50000.94740.5526
Pop120.68200.74430.63160.11271.49232.00000.97321.0268
Pop130.63730.76550.53990.22561.15311.42530.95720.4681
Pop140.55160.64990.44120.20870.93251.55060.58130.9693
Pop150.45210.62790.34570.28220.68721.26320.44440.8188
Pop160.44230.54100.33960.33960.64350.84530.46370.3816
Pop170.52070.69200.38090.31110.86201.45260.47070.9819
Pop180.51140.66050.42410.23640.83551.47930.56970.9096
Pop190.39970.53680.27650.26030.57700.89640.34780.5486
Pop200.56790.66800.48740.18060.93891.31360.69460.619
Pop210.40180.52570.27010.25560.53050.84760.29080.5568
Pop220.52570.71790.34080.37710.84661.48220.45531.0269
Pop230.49690.59300.42860.16440.60170.85710.41180.4453
Pop240.51490.61540.42110.19430.81871.33330.57140.7619
Pop250.58040.64830.48940.15890.98621.27330.80780.4655
Pop260.52330.68570.44000.24570.85431.42860.62670.8019
Pop270.37130.48720.28650.20070.57511.02040.36840.652
Pop280.45210.56070.38290.17780.58600.78180.47220.3096
Pop290.54290.62960.41050.21910.92481.23530.64000.5953
Pop300.49290.55870.43770.1210.64440.77480.47970.2951
Pop310.56360.68580.50360.18220.89591.47240.67020.8022
Pop320.52830.59190.43120.16070.76561.00320.52240.4808
Pop330.49480.58570.38230.20340.82041.01330.61450.3988
Pop340.40130.56770.29760.27010.51140.77840.28610.4923
Pop350.41780.55540.33940.2160.56160.79480.39590.3989
Pop360.39060.51200.29800.2140.51760.76070.35520.4055
Pop370.33570.46130.23250.22880.36510.65520.26710.3881
Pop380.33540.46260.25040.21220.46930.68490.30810.3768
Pop390.22180.37840.13730.24110.24790.50000.09090.4091
Pop400.27360.47830.19720.28110.27230.46430.19820.2661
Pop410.16580.22310.09700.12610.17980.26120.08730.1739
Pop420.25680.32160.14420.17740.27230.40630.17770.2286
Pop430.21710.27580.17440.10140.24070.29700.19090.1061
Pop440.27060.37230.21150.16080.28610.46300.17050.2925

Relationships between leaf variations and elevation, longitude and latitude

Correlation analysis revealed that the AC/AB and DC/BE values were both significantly correlated with latitudes and altitudes (Table 2, P<0.01and P<0.05, respectively). With higher latitudes and/or altitudes, the blade divisions became deeper, and the blade lobes became narrower, especially on a single mountain, such as the four populations on the north slope of Mt. Taibai, Shaanxi province. The indices of leaf division showed no significant correlation with the longitudes or with the different longitudes at approximately the same latitudes. In general, individuals from populations in the southeastern area of the distribution of the species complex tended to have shallower lateral clefts of leaf blades and wider central lobes than those from the northwestern area. The differences among all of the populations are gradational rather than distinct.

Discussion

Traditional classification and species delimitation are mainly based on herbarium specimens, and this strategy introduces many limitations. For example, herbarium specimens are often partial but not entire plants; furthermore, very few specimens are collected from the same location, rendering it difficult to reflect the within-population variation. Coupled with the impact of the concept of type species, some scholars believe that a specimen can represent all the characteristics of a given species. Many new species are established based on the differences between the specimens in hand and holotype according to one or two morphological traits. Individuals that are distinct from the holotype cannot be established as new taxa [2]. In the present study, the morphological traits of leaf blades for discriminating the species in R. palmatum complex were analyzed at the population level. Unfortunately, species within the species complex cannot be discriminated by the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes. As shown in Figure 3, the depth of the lateral cleft (represented by AC/AB) and the width of the central lobe (represented by DC/BE) are continuous. The present study indicates that the two indices (AC/AB and DC/BE) are continuous among different species of the complex, and even the within-population variation could be larger than the interpecific variation. Our findings are consistent with those of previous morphological studies. Ge and Hong [5], [7] studied morphological characteristics such as leaf shape, tooth number and size of leaf margins of Adenophora potaninii complex, and no discontinuities were found among them. Based on their findings, they recognized only one species and two subspecies within the species complex. Yang et al. [27] investigated the morphological variation pattern of Medicago sativa complex, and they showed that the morphology of stems and leaves was too similar to be the key characteristics for the complex. Leaves are photosynthetic organs. To absorb sufficient light energy, leaves must be as wide as possible. Meanwhile, to facilitate gas exchange (CO2, O2 and H2O), leaves tend to be flat and thin. Therefore, leaves become the organ with the largest contact area with the environment, and they are thus heavily influenced by the environment. Many quantitative characteristics in plants, including size, weight and number, are controlled by polygenes [28], and the variation of these characteristics is continuous within and/or among populations. Therefore, these characteristics are less meaningful for species delimitation. Although such quantitative characteristics are greatly influenced by the environment, their intrinsic genetic variety may not be high. Thus, they are not good taxonomic characteristics [2]. The traditional identification of R. palmatum complex was indeed based on unreliable morphological characteristics. Morphological characteristics based on the degree of leaf blade dissection and the lobe shape are continuous among and within the studied populations. Yang and Zhang published a new species, R. qinlingense, which was later treated as a synonym of R. palmatum [29]. According to our analysis, R. qinlingense actually represents the intermediate type of R. officinale and R. palmatum. Wu et al. [29] also suggested that R. officinale and R. palmatum as recorded in Flora Tsinlingensis [30] should actually be considered as a single species. Our field survey showed that different leaf blades described as R. officinale and R. palmatum can be found within a single population, such as Pop14 (Xiabansi, Mt. Taibai, the major peak of Mts. Qinling). This phenomenon can also be found in R. palmatum and R. tanguticum, such as Pop38 (Jimai Village, Dari County, Qinghai Province). As described in Flora of China [20], R. laciniatum differs from R. tanguticum only in the shape of the lobelets. R. laciniatum is distributed in the northern Sichuan Province; unfortunately, we failed to find a specimen of R. laciniatum in any of the herbaria in China. According to the scatter diagram or the histogram, it is clear that R. laciniatum is not a separate entity but an extreme form of R. tanguticum. Likewise, R. tanguticum var. liupanshanense also represents an extreme form of R. tanguticum var. tanguticum. Similar findings also exist for other taxa, e.g., Gallego et al. [31]. Our analysis did not support R. officinale, R. tanguticum or R. laciniatum as independent species. It appears more reasonable to recognize these species as synonyms of R. palmatum. AC/AB and DC/BE values were found to be significantly correlated with each other, indicating that the degree of leaf blade dissection and the shape of the lobes were not meaningful for identifying the species in R. palmatum complex. Moreover, AC/AB and DC/BE were both significantly correlated with latitudes, altitudes and longitudes (Table 2). Continuous variation in morphological characteristics among species in R. palmatum complex may be caused by geographical and ecological factors (e.g., altitude, latitude, longitude). With the latitude rising, the growth environment of R. palmatum complex becomes increasingly dry. While the leaves of R. palmatum complex are relatively large, so in order to reduce transpiration area, the leaf lobes of R. palmatum complex become deeper and narrower. The change of the altitude is similar with that of the latitude.To date, many reports have dealt with the relationships among R. officinale, R. tanguticum, and R. palmatum at the molecular level as described in the introduction. It should be noted that these studies [22]–[24] have involved only a limited number of samples for each species. It is clear that the morphological analysis must be complemented by an analysis of molecular characteristics, such as ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequences or single (or low) copy nuclear genes, for better resolution within Sect. Palmata and to examine the interspecific relationships proposed in this study. A molecular study is currently underway to gain further insight into this issue. As for R. laciniatum, its difference from R. tanguticum lies only in the shape of the lobelets, which are linear and lanceolate for R. laciniatum and R. tanguticum, respectively. Although the terminal lobes were not analyzed in the present study, leaf lobe types, which varied from no secondary lobes to trilobate lobes, differ greatly among different populations, among different individuals within the same population, and even among different blades of the same individual. Whether secondary lobes or trilobate lobes, their shape also varied from triangular to narrowly lanceolate. In summary, we suggest that R. palmatum complex be considered as a single species. Rheum officinale, R. tanguticum (including var. liupanshanense) and R. laciniatum are synonyms of R. palmatum. However, our hypothesis has yet to be confirmed by further studies, possibly using various molecular markers.
  3 in total

1.  Species delimitation in systematics: inferring diagnostic differences between species.

Authors:  J J Wiens; M R Servedio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Molecular phylogeny, recent radiation and evolution of gross morphology of the rhubarb genus Rheum (Polygonaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA trnL-F sequences.

Authors:  Ailan Wang; Meihua Yang; Jianquan Liu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Molecular analysis of Rheum species used as Rhei Rhizoma based on the chloroplast matK gene sequence and its application for identification.

Authors:  Dong-Ye Yang; Hirotoshi Fushimi; Shao-Qing Cai; Katsuko Komatsu
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.233

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Morphological and genetic differences between Coptis japonica var. anemonifolia H. Ohba and Coptis japonica var. major Satake in Hokuriku area.

Authors:  Masashi Kitamura; Hirokazu Ando; Yohei Sasaki
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.343

2.  Transcriptome profiles of yellowish-white and fuchsia colored flowers in the Rheum palmatum complex reveal genes related to color polymorphism.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Jiangyan Sun; Yunyan Zhai; Chenxi Gao; Markus Ruhsam; Xumei Wang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The Potential Roles of Unique Leaf Structure for the Adaptation of Rheum tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf. in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Yanping Hu; Huixuan Zhang; Qian Qian; Gonghua Lin; Jun Wang; Jing Sun; Yi Li; Jyan-Chyun Jang; Wenjing Li
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Rhubarb Botanical Origins and the Development of Specific Identification Markers.

Authors:  Yuxin Zhou; Jing Nie; Ling Xiao; Zhigang Hu; Bo Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Genetic and chemical differentiation characterizes top-geoherb and non-top-geoherb areas in the TCM herb rhubarb.

Authors:  Xumei Wang; Li Feng; Tao Zhou; Markus Ruhsam; Lei Huang; Xiaoqi Hou; Xiaojie Sun; Kai Fan; Min Huang; Yun Zhou; Jie Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.