| Literature DB >> 25349722 |
Sonia Alves Gouvea1, Renata V Tiradentes1, Cintia H Santuzzi1, Vinícius Mengal1, Henrique de A Futuro Neto2, Nyam F Silva3, Gláucia R Abreu1.
Abstract
The purpose was to determine the role of renal nerves in mediating the effects of antihypertensive treatment with L-arginine in a renovascular hypertension model. The 2K1C (two-kidney one-clip model) hypertensive rats were submitted to bilateral surgical-pharmacological renal denervation. The animals were subdivided into six experimental groups: normotensive control rats (SHAM), 2K1C rats, 2K1C rats treated with L-arginine (2K1C + L-arg), denervated normotensive (DN) rats, denervated 2K1C (2K1C + DN) rats, and denervated 2K1C + L-arg (2K1C + DN + L-arg) rats. Arterial blood pressure, water intake, urine volume, and sodium excretion were measured. The 2K1C rats exhibited an increase in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 106 ± 3 to 183 ± 5.8 mmHg, P < 0.01), whereas L-arg treatment induced a reduction in the MAP (143 ± 3.4 mmHg) without lowering it to the control level. Renal nerve denervation reduced the MAP to normotensive levels in 2K1C rats with or without chronic L-arg treatment. L-arg and denervation induced increases in water intake and urine volume, and L-arg caused a significant natriuretic effect. Our results suggest that renal sympathetic activity participates in the genesis and the maintenance of the hypertension and also demonstrate that treatment with L-arg alone is incapable of normalizing the MAP and that the effect of such treatment is not additive with the effect of kidney denervation.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25349722 PMCID: PMC4199080 DOI: 10.1155/2014/735627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hypertens Impact factor: 2.420
Figure 1(a) Systolic blood pressure data measured by tail cuff in renovascular hypertensive rats (time 0: baseline before surgery, 7th day after surgery and/or denervation, and 14th day after surgery and/or denervation and L-arginine treatment). (b) Mean arterial pressures at the end of experiment in conscious rats for all experimental groups (SHAM: normotensive control; 2K1C: two-kidney one-clip; 2K1C + L-arg: two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine; DN: denervated normotensive; 2K1C + DN: denervated two-kidney one-clip; and 2K1C + DN + L-arg: denervated two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine). The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus SHAM; † P < 0.05 versus 2K1C; ‡ P < 0.05 versus DN; # P < 0.05 versus 2K1C + L-arg; § P < 0.05 versus 2K1C + DN, and + P < 0.05 versus 2K1C + DN + L-arg (Tukey test).
Figure 2Water intake (a) and urinary excretion (b) after oral L-arginine (L-arg) administration to the SHAM, two-kidney one-clip, and denervated groups. The groups are as follows: SHAM: normotensive control; 2K1C: two-kidney one-clip; 2K1C + L-arg: two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine; DN: denervated normotensive; 2K1C + DN: denervated two-kidney one-clip; and 2K1C + DN + L-arg: denervated two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine. The data are shown for 7 days of L-arg administration. Data are reported as the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with SHAM; † P < 0.05 and †† P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C; ‡‡ P < 0.01 compared with DN; ## P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C + L-arg (Tukey test).
Figure 3Urinary sodium excretion after oral L-arginine (L-arg) administration to the SHAM, two-kidney one-clip, and denervated groups. The groups are as follows: SHAM: normotensive control; 2K1C: two-kidney one-clip; 2K1C + L-arg: two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine; DN: denervated normotensive; 2K1C + DN: denervated two-kidney one-clip; and 2K1C + DN + L-arg: denervated two-kidney one-clip treated with L-arginine. The data are shown for 7 days of L-arg administration. Data are reported as the means ± SEM. **P < 0.01 compared with SHAM; †† P < 0.01 compared with DN; † P < 0.05 and †† P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C; # P < 0.05 compared with 2K1C + L-arg; P < 0.05 compared with 2K1C + DN (Tukey test).