Literature DB >> 25349361

Preference and behavior of lactating dairy cows given free access to pasture at two herbage masses and two distances.

P R Motupalli1, L A Sinclair1, G L Charlton1, E C Bleach2, S M Rutter1.   

Abstract

A number of factors influence dairy cow preference to be indoors or at pasture. The study reported here investigated whether herbage mass and distance affects preference and if continuously housed cows exhibited behavioral and production differences compared to cows that had free access to pasture. Dairy cows (n = 16) were offered a free choice of being in cubicle housing (1.5 cubicles/cow) or at pasture with a high (3,000 ± 200 kg DM/ha) vs. low (1,800 ± 200 kg DM/ha) herbage mass. A control group (n = 16) was confined to cubicle housing for the duration of the study. Each herbage mass was offered at either a near (38 m) or far (254 m) distance in a 2 × 2 factorial crossover design to determine motivation to access pasture. Overall, dairy cows expressed a partial preference to be at pasture, spending 68.7% of their time at pasture. This was not affected (P > 0.05) by herbage mass. Both grass intake (P = 0.001) and grazing time (P = 0.039) was greater when cows were offered the high herbage mass. Neither total mixed ration intake (P > 0.05) nor milk yield (P > 0.05) was affected by herbage mass or distance. Additionally, no interaction existed between herbage mass and distance (P > 0.05). Distance affected preference: overall time on pasture was greater at the near distance (P = 0.002); however, nighttime use was not affected by distance (P = 0.184). Housed cows produced less milk than free-choice cows and this was potentially due to a combination of decreased lying time in housed cows (P < 0.001) and grass intake (1.22 kg/d) in free-choice cows. This study shows that herbage mass is not a major factor driving dairy cow preference for pasture, but distance does affect preference for pasture during the day. Additionally, there are clear production and welfare benefits for providing cows with a choice to be at pasture or cubicle housing over being continuously housed. Further research is necessary to quantify the effect of lying time on milk yields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to pasture; behavior; dairy cow; distance; herbage mass; housed

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25349361     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

Review 1.  Grassland-based ruminant farming systems in China: Potential, challenges and a way forward.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Ling Wang
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Dairy cows value an open area for lying down.

Authors:  Laura Shewbridge Carter; Marie J Haskell; David Ball; Jenny Gibbons; W Edwin Harris; S Mark Rutter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Impact of Daily Grazing Time on Dairy Cow Welfare-Results of the Welfare Quality® Protocol.

Authors:  Kathrin Wagner; Jan Brinkmann; Solveig March; Peter Hinterstoißer; Sylvia Warnecke; Maximilian Schüler; Hans Marten Paulsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

5.  Pasture Access Affects Behavioral Indicators of Wellbeing in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Helen Kabboush; Jennifer Weller; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Welfare of Dairy Cows in Pasture, Free Stall, and Compost Barn Management Systems in a Brazilian Subtropical Region.

Authors:  Paula de Andrade Kogima; Taciana Aparecida Diesel; Frederico Márcio Correa Vieira; Ana Luiza Bachmann Schogor; Alana Aparecida Volpini; Géssica Jaine Veloso; Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz; Maria Luísa Appendino Nunes Zotti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  A "Good Life" for Dairy Cattle: Developing and Piloting a Framework for Assessing Positive Welfare Opportunities Based on Scientific Evidence and Farmer Expertise.

Authors:  Jessica E Stokes; Elizabeth Rowe; Siobhan Mullan; Joy C Pritchard; Rachel Horler; Marie J Haskell; Cathy M Dwyer; David C J Main
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.231

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.