Literature DB >> 25349230

Validation of the Oudega diagnostic decision rule for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in frail older out-of-hospital patients.

Henrike J Schouten1, Huiberdina L Koek2, Ruud Oudega3, Johannes J M van Delden3, Karel G M Moons3, Geert-Jan Geersing3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the Oudega diagnostic decision rule-which was developed and validated among younger aged primary care patients-to rule-out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in frail older outpatients.
METHODS: In older patients (>60 years, either community dwelling or residing in nursing homes) with clinically suspected DVT, physicians recorded the score on the Oudega rule and d-dimer test. DVT was confirmed with a composite reference standard including ultrasonography examination and 3-month follow-up. The proportion of patients with a very low probability of DVT according to the Oudega rule (efficiency), and the proportion of patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism during 3 months follow-up within this 'very low risk' group (failure rate) was calculated.
RESULTS: DVT occurred in 164 (47%) of the 348 study participants (mean age 81 years, 85% residing in nursing homes). The probability of DVT was very low in 69 patients (Oudega score ≤3 points plus a normal d-dimer test; efficiency 20%) of whom four had non-fatal DVT (failure rate 5.8%; 2.3-14%). With a simple revised version of the Oudega rule for older suspected patients, 43 patients had a low risk of DVT (12% of the total population) of whom only one had DVT (failure rate 2.3%; 0.4-12%).
CONCLUSIONS: In older suspected patients, application of the original Oudega rule to exclude DVT resulted in a higher failure rate as compared to previous studies. A revised and simplified Oudega strategy specifically developed for elderly suspected patients resulted in a lower failure rate though at the expense of a lower efficiency.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical prediction rule; d-dimer; deep vein thrombosis; diagnosis; elderly; venous thromboembolism.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25349230     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmu068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  1 in total

1.  Real-life impact of clinical prediction rules for venous thromboembolism in primary care: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Rosanne van Maanen; Annelieke E C Kingma; Ruud Oudega; Frans H Rutten; Karel Moons; Geert-Jan Geersing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.